The war has become us vs them instead of right and wrong, or good and bad. Moore's court decisions have him defending the rapists or molesters instead of the victims. He has shown exactly who and what he is.
Been that way since Clinton and the fault is yours. Suddenly finding your morality isn't going to change a thing this election; of that you can be assured.
They can’t beat their opponent so they revert to smear tactics.. Speaks volumes.....They must be pretty scared or they haven’t learned a thing in the hillary debacle
Sorry, it may not be coincidence for an unrelated reason: the Harvey Weinstein accusations. How many women prefer the indignity of rape over decades than being exposed as a harlot or liar? Sean Hannity saying those women are in it for the money. It is common knowledge about rape trials that the defense makes the accuser a wanton slut. The man accused may have slept with twenty women in twenty days but the "harlot" accuser had sex once a year ago and is a promiscuous whore, whose word cannot be relied on. That is the reality of bringing rape or sexual abuse charges.
What that link says is total crap. As usual, the lack of detail by the right and its propensity, at times, to leap to conclusions is at fault. Corfman never met or had an exchange with Moore.
What that link says is total crap. As usual, the lack of detail by the right and its propensity, at times, to leap to conclusions is at fault. Corfman never met or had an exchange with Moore.
Sorry Moldy, I don't "stick things up my orifice" the way you weirdos do. But your article is quite interesting. It shows that Moore is a thinking man. He does not yield to the torch-carrying mentality that wants to destroy rather than understand. Certainly a teenager convicted of sexual misconduct against another teenager does not deserve 23 years in prison; Moore was right. The punishment must fit the crime; it must not be a sledge hammer wielded by wild-eyed maniacs. And Moore was right that Defendants deserve a right to appeal. You don't slap an unreasonable sentence on someone and then deny them an appeal. The ultra-left New York Times has a way of twisting facts to suit their left-wing attitude, and they have you thoroughly convinced. But I am convinced that Moore is a fair and honest judge, one who is willing to push emotions aside to look at a case and its facts honestly. Everybody deserves a fair trial. I think that Moore is a better choice than Jones, who is totally in bed with the political establishment. We have too many establishment politicians; they need to go.
Sorry Moldy, I don't "stick things up my orifice" the way you weirdos do. But your article is quite interesting. It shows that Moore is a thinking man. He does not yield to the torch-carrying mentality that wants to destroy rather than understand. Certainly a teenager convicted of sexual misconduct against another teenager does not deserve 23 years in prison; Moore was right. The punishment must fit the crime; it must not be a sledge hammer wielded by wild-eyed maniacs. And Moore was right that Defendants deserve a right to appeal. You don't slap an unreasonable sentence on someone and then deny them an appeal. The ultra-left New York Times has a way of twisting facts to suit their left-wing attitude, and they have you thoroughly convinced. But I am convinced that Moore is a fair and honest judge, one who is willing to push emotions aside to look at a case and its facts honestly. Everybody deserves a fair trial. I think that Moore is a better choice than Jones, who is totally in bed with the political establishment. We have too many establishment politicians; they need to go.
Sorry Moldy, I don't "stick things up my orif... (show quote)