The Right: you can't trust the media and yet quote your preferred incestuous media: InfoWars, Rush, Fox News and so on
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close and resistant to outside influence." Your resistance to "outside influence" is your sole verification of fact. Ignore fact-checkers, sworn statements, videos, and reality. Just put your hands over your ears and say "NANANANANANA..." real loud and you think you made a counter-argument against clear evidence. My experience of most on the Right of OPP. Abomination is a very heavy word. Really loaded with many unsavory traits. Many on the Right here are cozy in the rancid fat of this word. Most of their comments appear to extol abomination, given their consistent fetid lies, mean-spiritedness, and disrespect. The Right here is mostly a pathetic, and sad, group of abused inbred survivors of fear-mongering and hateful parents.
rumitoid wrote:
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close and resistant to outside influence." Your resistance to "outside influence" is your sole verification of fact. Ignore fact-checkers, sworn statements, videos, and reality. Just put your hands over your ears and say "NANANANANANA..." real loud and you think you made a counter-argument against clear evidence. My experience of most on the Right of OPP. Abomination is a very heavy word. Really loaded with many unsavory traits. Many on the Right here are cozy in the rancid fat of this word. Most of their comments appear to extol abomination, given their consistent fetid lies, mean-spiritedness, and disrespect. The Right here is mostly a pathetic, and sad, group of abused inbred survivors of fear-mongering and hateful parents.
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close ... (
show quote)
You will feel better the closer you get to the bottom of the bottle.
Hemiman wrote:
You will feel better the closer you get to the bottom of the bottle.
Always true, a wise statement. And you will better the closer you get to the bottom of ignorance and stupidity, a natural affinity.
rumitoid wrote:
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close and resistant to outside influence." Your resistance to "outside influence" is your sole verification of fact. Ignore fact-checkers, sworn statements, videos, and reality. Just put your hands over your ears and say "NANANANANANA..." real loud and you think you made a counter-argument against clear evidence. My experience of most on the Right of OPP. Abomination is a very heavy word. Really loaded with many unsavory traits. Many on the Right here are cozy in the rancid fat of this word. Most of their comments appear to extol abomination, given their consistent fetid lies, mean-spiritedness, and disrespect. The Right here is mostly a pathetic, and sad, group of abused inbred survivors of fear-mongering and hateful parents.
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close ... (
show quote)
1) Who says we trust them? What is "trust" BTW? For instance: I
trust that about 20% of what's on Fox is worth the time to listen to; mostly because it's so
repetitive. Sometimes it's BS. Lot's of times they could talk about more important things.
2) I trust that about 5% to 10% of what the rest of the media reports on is worth listening to. Same reasons as above.
The difference is that I can go to all the alphabet stations and hear the exact same words from lots of different people. You guys get a better choice of newsbabes to take your poison from. That's not fair!
BigMike wrote:
1) Who says we trust them? What is "trust" BTW? For instance: I trust that about 20% of what's on Fox is worth the time to listen to; mostly because it's so repetitive. Sometimes it's BS. Lot's of times they could talk about more important things.
2) I trust that about 5% to 10% of what the rest of the media reports on is worth listening to. Same reasons as above.
The difference is that I can go to all the alphabet stations and hear the exact same words from lots of different people. You guys get a better choice of newsbabes to take your poison from. That's not fair!
1) Who says we trust them? What is "trust&quo... (
show quote)
"You guys get a better choice of newsbabes to take your poison from. That's not fair!" Meaning better informationally? A wider view compared to being fixated on Fox? Or the pretty weather girls?
Wolf counselor wrote:
The poor stinking drunk.
Harvard Debate Class? Where do you find the words?
[quote=rumitoid]"You guys get a better choice of newsbabes to take your poison from. That's not fair!" Meaning better informationally? A wider view compared to being fixated on Fox? Or the pretty weather girls?[/quote}
None of them are worth that much informationally speaking. 24 hours of news for 24 minutes worth of reporting.
The babes are nice, though, and you have more to choose from.
BigMike wrote:
1) Who says we trust them? What is "trust" BTW? For instance: I trust that about 20% of what's on Fox is worth the time to listen to; mostly because it's so repetitive. Sometimes it's BS. Lot's of times they could talk about more important things.
2) I trust that about 5% to 10% of what the rest of the media reports on is worth listening to. Same reasons as above.
The difference is that I can go to all the alphabet stations and hear the exact same words from lots of different people. You guys get a better choice of newsbabes to take your poison from. That's not fair!
1) Who says we trust them? What is "trust&quo... (
show quote)
I think ladies on FOX are much hotter then ladies on the other stations and im a lady....And i think most guys on FOX are pretty foxy too
[quote=BigMike][quote=rumitoid]"You guys get a better choice of newsbabes to take your poison from. That's not fair!" Meaning better informationally? A wider view compared to being fixated on Fox? Or the pretty weather girls?[/quote}
None of them are worth that much informationally speaking. 24 hours of news for 24 minutes worth of reporting.
The babes are nice, though, and you have more to choose from.[/quote]
Glad to see you are open to something new: no matter how self-serving, it is a start.
rumitoid wrote:
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close and resistant to outside influence." Your resistance to "outside influence" is your sole verification of fact. Ignore fact-checkers, sworn statements, videos, and reality. Just put your hands over your ears and say "NANANANANANA..." real loud and you think you made a counter-argument against clear evidence. My experience of most on the Right of OPP. Abomination is a very heavy word. Really loaded with many unsavory traits. Many on the Right here are cozy in the rancid fat of this word. Most of their comments appear to extol abomination, given their consistent fetid lies, mean-spiritedness, and disrespect. The Right here is mostly a pathetic, and sad, group of abused inbred survivors of fear-mongering and hateful parents.
Yes, incestuous. Defined: "excessively close ... (
show quote)
And you were a spoiled rotten little boy that always got what he wanted when he stomped his feet and held his breath!!!! These meaneeee old adults just refuse to follow your rules of YOUR game!!! Shall I call your Momie for you to comfort you? You are soooo very juvenile!!!!
proud republican wrote:
I think ladies on FOX are much hotter then ladies ... (
show quote)
I am also a lady and I agree with you, except for Sheppard! He is irritating. My favorite is Cavuto!!!!!
rumitoid wrote:
Glad to see you are open to something new: no matter how self-serving, it is a start.
Thank you for such a graceful compliment.
TexaCan wrote:
I am also a lady and I agree with you, except for Sheppard! He is irritating. My favorite is Cavuto!!!!!
Jesse Waters and Greg Gutfeld are my two favs
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.