kemmer

It's amazing, that with all of Trump's obvious unsuitability for his office, his childlike followers continue to defend one embarrassing antic and tone deaf statement after another.

kemmer

Nah. I think it would be more fun talking about Trump's 11+ lawsuits stemming from stiffing his contractors and workers.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

What is really amazing kemmer, is your obvious unsuitability to post anything worth a crap.
Childlike was following the last guy in office.

Kazudy

Of course.

maddog52770

You IDIOT we the people put trump in office not puttin not russia we did.andhe is dangerous, to any anti american POS that dares to go against us,and there are alot of us so beware

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

I have to say...the dire situation in the UK is tragically sad...at one time the sun never set on their empire... England allowed this to develop to where it is now and we as Americans have to be vigilant or we will follow...in their demise..

cbpat1

I love the way the liberals look at the world. This headline says it all: Trump is the most dangerous person on the planet, no debate! NO DEBATE! That's what the democrats want, NO DEBATE. They don't want to debate, they want to dictate. Their view of the world is the only legitimate view, the only view allowed. They will shout down, in order to shut down anyone who disagrees with them. Doesn't matter what the subject is, abortion, if your not for it your waging a war on women, if you don't believe in global warming, then your a denier, if your not for gun control, then your a dirty killer, if you want to lower taxes for EVERYONE, then you are a greedy one percenter who doesn't want those greedy bastards to pay their fair share, while others who pay nothing, they believe are paying their fair share, if your not gay your a homophobe, if your not black your a racist, it just never stops and the truth doesn't have to be any part of the equation. It's very sad to see our country being ripped apart by these selfish, short sighted ideological morons.

Fahrenheit2017

Try to be more understanding: Liberals were taught by Feminists. They were explicitly taught how NOT to think.

PRM2014

You are dead wrong about Putin, you are behind time Hillary is the one Putin wanted. And Hillary is a worthless lying DemoCRAP.
Muller is barking up the wrong tree, he needs to get Hillary and her bunch of lying crooks.

cbpat1

PRM2014, I believe your correct!

Randy131 Loc: Florida

DAMN, I just can't believe someone can be as stupid as you pretend to be. First off, take a very close look at the state districting maps, that you posted with your original comment, of Pennsylvania and Ohio, and you should be able to tell that not one district was ever changed in either state from the 2012 national election to the 2016 national election, but the people in those unchanged districts voted in 2016 for the Donald Trump instead of Hillary Clinton, when the older district map showed those same districts voted in 2012 for Obama instead of Mitt Romney. No gerrymandering changes of any districts in Pennsylvania and Ohio, but only hundreds of thousands of Democratic voters deciding to vote for the Republican candidate Donald Trump, instead of the Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, are you honestly not able to see and discern that? So if that many Democratic voters in those two states, as well as in Wisconsin and Michigan, decided to vote for the Republican candidate, instead of the Democratic candidate, don't you think in the state of North Carolina that districts were changed, and which you claim were gerrymandered, many of those Democrats also decided to vote for the Republican candidate, like they did in Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, instead of the Democratic candidate too? The changing of any of the redistricting in North Carolina had nothing to do with Democrats voting for the Republican candidate Donald Trump, instead of the Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, since it was the majority of the popular vote in every state that determines which political party's electorial representatives get to vote in the electorial college in every state, proving that the districts had absolutely nothing to do with who won the Presidential election.

Do you even know that gerrymandering was invented by the Democrats, which the Republicans learned from, and if the Republicans did any gerrymandering, which you haven't shown an ounce of proof that they did, they only got to do it because the Democrats lost their majorities in those states you claim it was done in. The Democrats lost their majorities in those states because the people were so mad with Democrats for passing the terrible '(un)Affordable Care Act' (Obamacare) into law, so they voted Democrats out of the majority and the Republicans into the majority in those states. The Democrats have now lost over 1,300 political seats all across the USA in just the last 8 years. Redistricting by the new majority Republicans couldn't be done until after the 2010 census was taken, that showed the losing or gaining of Reprsentative seats for the US Congress in every state, according to what their new populations proved to be by the start of 2011, the earliest any redistricting could even be started.

Your own posted maps of Pennsylvania proved that their was no redistricting done in that state, as well as your own posted maps of Ohio proved the same, but you have not shown any proof of redistricting in the states of Wisconsin and Michigan, but since I live in Florida I know there was no redistricting done in Florida, because the state Judges would now allow any redistricting to go into affect until after the 2016 elections, because the Democrats were whining about gerrymandering in Florida also, where the Republicans have majority control in the House and Senate of Florida, and we also have a Republican Governor. So since the redistricting was not allowed until after the national elections in Florida, it had absolutely nothing to do with the voting results in Florida, which makes you a liar once again. So where is your proof of gerrymandering in the states of Wisconsin and Michigan, which are controlled by Democratic majorities in both their House and Senate in each of those states, as the Democrats are also in majority control of the House and Senate in Pennsylvania too. So if any gerrymandering was done in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, as you claim it has been done, then it was done by the Democrats, and not the Republicans, and President Trump won in all three of those states, because hundreds of thosuands of Democrats in each of those states voted for Donald Trump for President, instead of Hillary Clinton. Maine is also controlled by Democratic majorities in the state House and Senate, so if any gerrymandering was done there, as you claim it has been done, then it was also done by the Democrats, just like in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, but Maine did vote for Hillary Clinton through much voter fraud, by people who were registered to vote in other states too.

As far as fascism is concerned, it has always historically been either socialists, communists, or Marxists that became fascist and forced fascism on their subjects, and never throughout human history have any conservatives or Christians been fascists, and if you don't believe that, then tell me and I'll post an article that proves this through the facts of history concerning all fascism that has ever been used, who the fascists were, and in what country they perpetrated fascism against the population.

Also the Russians never made any accusations against Hillary Clinton, nor did they ever hack the computers of the DNC or the Clinton campaign.
The e-mails from the DNC and Clinton campaign that were released to the public by Wikileaks was obtained by Juliane Assange through a DNC IT employee who leaked the e-mails to him and Wikileaks, and Assange and Wikileaks has admitted to this many times. So it was Hillary's own words and what she had been doing in her campaign that the American people didn't like and refused to vote for her because of the revelation of her real words in her own e-mails that she and the Democrats were hiding from the American people, and the cheating she and the DNC were doing to make sure Bernie Sanders would not win the Democratic nomination.

Facebook has reported that they believe some people who were associated with the Russians had spent $100,000.00 dollars for just under 2,000 advertisements with them, but most of those advertisements were in favor of Hillary Clinton winning the Presidency. Sorry the false accusations that have proven to be unfounded about any collusion between President Trump and the Russians are nothing but lies, that poor losers like you keep using as just another excuse for Hillary Clinton losing the election that was won by Donald Trump, because so many milions and millions of Democrats voted for him, especially in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Iowa, and Florida, as well as in all the states that President Trump won the electorial votes in.

As far as your claim that "45% of the people who didn't vote at all in protest of our candidates", that is a strange claim since we had a fairly good turnout for a Presidential election, but it has been proven that at least 7.5 million fraudulent votes were cast for Hillary Clinton by illegal immigrants, non-American citizens, dead American citizens, and citizens of other countries and nations that have been living in the USA, and almost half of those were from two counties in California, Los Angeles and San Diego counties.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

A lot of very good points that the actions and words of liberals prevent them from denying those good points.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Nearly all of the fact-checking pieces have thoroughly documented that the fraud claims are ridiculously untrue, but were there any documented cases of fraud? We know the “millions” claim is absurd, but was the total number of fraudulent votes literally zero? The Washington Post did some digging:
We combed through the news-aggregation system Nexis to find demonstrated cases of absentee or in-person voter fraud – which is to say, examples of people getting caught casting a ballot that they shouldn’t – during this election. This excludes examples of voter registration fraud – the filing of fraudulent voter registration information. Those aren’t votes cast – and given that organizations often provide incentives for employees to register as many people as possible, registration fraud cases (while still rare) are more common.
The Post’s research found a grand total of four documented instances of voters attempted to cast fraudulent votes. Not four percent, literally four individuals.

And most of them were Republicans.

No, really. A Trump voter in Iowa got caught trying to vote twice in Des Moines, and when asked for an explanation, she said, “The polls are rigged.” She was joined by a Texas Republican who claimed to be associated with the Trump campaign who tried to vote twice because he wanted to “test” the integrity of the system. (Evidently, the system works fine.) Also, a Republican woman in Illinois was caught filling out an absentee ballot for her deceased husband.

None of these votes, by the way, were counted.

As for the fourth case, a woman was hired to open absentee ballots in Miami-Dade County, and she was caught filling in others’ ballots in support of a Republican mayoral candidate.

That’s it. There are no other documented cases of voter fraud in the entire country in 2016. These four represent 0.000002% of the ballots cast, and again, they weren’t actually included in any official tallies.

If you’ve been led to believe fraud is a genuine problem in American elections, someone has tried to fool you.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Becoming fewer every day...

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

You keep tossing out this word "proven" but never ever show any thing which backs you up..

this all seems to be a mix of your opinion and your wishes..