Today was a great day for Sessions. He clearly stated the truth even though a few democrats attempted to drum up some fiction, Sessions stayed with the facts. It was good to see, some of the LIES the media and democrats have spewed for a long time, get cleared up.
America Only wrote:
Today was a great day for Sessions. He clearly stated the truth even though a few democrats attempted to drum up some fiction, Sessions stayed with the facts. It was good to see, some of the LIES the media and democrats have spewed for a long time, get cleared up.
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defense " I do not recall" and " I have no recollection of that ".
He also refused to answer specific questions about conversations, citing " confidentiality" WITHOUT citing executive privilege, because he knew THAT excuse wasn't legal. However, he failed to explain how or why those conversations were classified, because they were not - he just refused to answer. It remains to be seen whether he is compelled to answer in closed session, or cited for contempt of Congress.
lpnmajor wrote:
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defense " I do not recall" and " I have no recollection of that ".
He also refused to answer specific questions about conversations, citing " confidentiality" WITHOUT citing executive privilege, because he knew THAT excuse wasn't legal. However, he failed to explain how or why those conversations were classified, because they were not - he just refused to answer. It remains to be seen whether he is compelled to answer in closed session, or cited for contempt of Congress.
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defen... (
show quote)
Oh no...very much the opposite. Of course you Trump haters desired to have some other outcome of some of the questions asked but what Sessions responded were not only proper but kept within the scope of how and what you can and cannot answer. In fact a lot of questions from the democrats on the committee were specifically aimed to make it appear he had something to hide when in fact, they KNOW he cannot answer when it involves direct conversation with the President. The failed democratic "tactics" just did not work today. Further all the LIES that have been stated about "secret meetings" and spy crap, were accurately addressed and answered. As Senator Cotton also stated, the way HOLDER refused to answer ANY questions the last time he was brought before that same committee shows that what is good for the Goose...is good for the Gander.
Eventually Hillary will be getting prosecuted...something you democrats just don't get....and this time around, all the crimes and crooks will go down right along with her....as they will be the ones to let the cat all the way out of the bag on what she did and how she did it.
One LARGE factor that is not being addressed yet....SETH RICH. TARMAC meeting between Lynch and Rapist Bill Clinton....and I am very certain a long list of things that have always been swept under the rug.
It was a great day today for Jeff Sessions...many of the lies are now proven out to be just that...the lefty media and democrats that are still BUTT HURT that cannot understand....we have a REAL President now....and America is better for it. Just as getting rid of Comey was a smart move.
lpnmajor wrote:
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defense " I do not recall" and " I have no recollection of that ".
He also refused to answer specific questions about conversations, citing " confidentiality" WITHOUT citing executive privilege, because he knew THAT excuse wasn't legal. However, he failed to explain how or why those conversations were classified, because they were not - he just refused to answer. It remains to be seen whether he is compelled to answer in closed session, or cited for contempt of Congress.
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defen... (
show quote)
Just wishful thinking on your part. No such luck. I guess you forgot how many times Hillary gave I don't know or refused to say. Hmmm, how soon you liberals forget facts when it is your people that have done the same thing and then maid excuses for them. GET REAL!!!!
lpnmajor wrote:
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defense " I do not recall" and " I have no recollection of that ".
He also refused to answer specific questions about conversations, citing " confidentiality" WITHOUT citing executive privilege, because he knew THAT excuse wasn't legal. However, he failed to explain how or why those conversations were classified, because they were not - he just refused to answer. It remains to be seen whether he is compelled to answer in closed session, or cited for contempt of Congress.
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defen... (
show quote)
looks to me like it depends upon what angle you head what he said
left ,right or middle
this response is why I call your diatribes on integrity, service, and morality,, crap......
lpnmajor wrote:
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defense " I do not recall" and " I have no recollection of that ".
He also refused to answer specific questions about conversations, citing " confidentiality" WITHOUT citing executive privilege, because he knew THAT excuse wasn't legal. However, he failed to explain how or why those conversations were classified, because they were not - he just refused to answer. It remains to be seen whether he is compelled to answer in closed session, or cited for contempt of Congress.
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defen... (
show quote)
America Only wrote:
Today was a great day for Sessions. He clearly stated the truth even though a few democrats attempted to drum up some fiction, Sessions stayed with the facts. It was good to see, some of the LIES the media and democrats have spewed for a long time, get cleared up.
Right on point. I would hate to be associated with many of those so called "Congressmen". What a joke.
lpnmajor wrote:
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defense " I do not recall" and " I have no recollection of that ".
He also refused to answer specific questions about conversations, citing " confidentiality" WITHOUT citing executive privilege, because he knew THAT excuse wasn't legal. However, he failed to explain how or why those conversations were classified, because they were not - he just refused to answer. It remains to be seen whether he is compelled to answer in closed session, or cited for contempt of Congress.
Haha! yep....when he wasn't using the Reagan defen... (
show quote)
Maybe you are not intelligent enough to understand, He cannot claim EP, THAT is reserved only for the POTUS, but Conversations with the POTUS are PRIVILEGED, and it is up to the PRESIDENT, ALONE, to decide whether he wants to make them public or not!! CAN you understand that? I don't really expect you to answer, you libs rarely do!!!
AND he never got rattled one bit. Sign of a CONFIDENT and HONEST MAN!!!
chuckybrass wrote:
Right on point. I would hate to be associated with many of those so called "Congressmen". What a joke.
Far too many in congress are a damned joke on both sides of the political parties.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.