Hannity Continues Pushing Seth Rich Conspiracy Theory After Fox News Retracts Story.
Fox news has not retracted the story, only their reporting of it. They have not said the story was false. They said they had inadequate proof to post the story as meeting their standards of verification.
JW wrote:
Fox news has not retracted the story, only their reporting of it. They have not said the story was false. They said they had inadequate proof to post the story as meeting their standards of verification.
JW-it is the only theory that makes sense. However to democrats and their ilk, chasing Ivan all over Siberia and wasting millions in taxpayer dollars in the process, is more in line with their agenda. None of these clowns have
offered to explain why Assange would spend 20K to get info on the death of a total stranger especially since
Assange has denied that the material was provided by the Russians. They are too hell bent on the witch hunt to
give it up now. Brenan initially said, "no evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians." Today Brenan
said,"there was contact between Trump campaign personnel and that he does not know if there was "collusion". If we give it another week or so Brenan will change his story again now there will be collusion. He cannot find evidence of collusion and probably needs more time to manufacture some. What a farce!!! Sounds like Comey does it not? I do not believe Trey Gowdy was fooled for one minute. America First !!!
Ricko wrote:
JW-it is the only theory that makes sense. However to democrats and their ilk, chasing Ivan all over Siberia and wasting millions in taxpayer dollars in the process, is more in line with their agenda. None of these clowns have
offered to explain why Assange would spend 20K to get info on the death of a total stranger especially since
Assange has denied that the material was provided by the Russians. They are too hell bent on the witch hunt to
give it up now. Brenan initially said, "no evidence of collusion between Trump and the Russians." Today Brenan
said,"there was contact between Trump campaign personnel and that he does not know if there was "collusion". If we give it another week or so Brenan will change his story again now there will be collusion. He cannot find evidence of collusion and probably needs more time to manufacture some. What a farce!!! Sounds like Comey does it not? I do not believe Trey Gowdy was fooled for one minute. America First !!!
JW-it is the only theory that makes sense. Howeve... (
show quote)
I agree and it follows on Podesta's threat to make an example of a leaker...
http://www.commonsenseevaluation.com/2016/12/15/john-podesta-threatened-make-example-leaker/#sthash.3mIbwHSl.dpbsThe Liberals can't deal with rejection so they imagine every possible excuse for losing that leaves their ideology intact. As long as they do that, they have to reject the idea that Donald Trump is a legitimate President and they act accordingly. To promote their anti-Trump fantasies, they try to 'correct' the facts of the past. In other words, expect a lot more lies until President Trump is reelected. In the meantime, watch the Democrats destroy their party.
JW wrote:
Fox news has not retracted the story, only their reporting of it. They have not said the story was false. They said they had inadequate proof to post the story as meeting their standards of verification.
Fox news has no standards of verification of gossip if it fits their propaganda agenda. The withdrew the story because compelling evidence proved it was a bogus story and everyone but the truly unbalanced knew it was bogus.
Glaucon wrote:
Fox news has no standards of verification of gossip if it fits their propaganda agenda. The withdrew the story because compelling evidence proved it was a bogus story and everyone but the truly unbalanced knew it was bogus.
I know you Liberals imagine if you say it, it will have to be true but I have to let you know, that's not how it works. The facts will come. Give it time.
JW wrote:
I know you Liberals imagine if you say it, it will have to be true but I have to let you know, that's not how it works. The facts will come. Give it time.
I am not a liberal and I don't know what liberals imagine. I do know that bogus beliefs seldom get to be true if we wait long enough. I think the Easter Bunny is still a myth and it has been around for a very long time.
Glaucon wrote:
I am not a liberal and I don't know what liberals imagine. I do know that bogus beliefs seldom get to be true if we wait long enough. I think the Easter Bunny is still a myth and it has been around for a very long time.
Glaucon-they could not prove the story so they withdrew same. So what is your explanation for the Assange
offer of 20K ? Assange is a nice guy and wanted to help the family of a total stranger? As smart as you are,
you know Rich being involved is the only plausible theory. No robbery ! Police files not available? What is being hidden? Do you really believe the Trump/Russia collusion BS? We know that Rod Wheeler ,the investigator, initially asserted thatRich was the leaker. Then he probably had second thoughts and decided that if he provided irrefutable proof, he could end up like Rich so he walked some of his words back. Who had the motive to have Rich eliminated if his actions were perceived as swinging the election? Are you not aware of how ruthless the Clinton machine is?
Could you be too trusting of the Clintons? America First!!!
Ricko wrote:
Glaucon-they could not prove the story so they withdrew same. So what is your explanation for the Assange
offer of 20K ? Assange is a nice guy and wanted to help the family of a total stranger? As smart as you are,
you know Rich being involved is the only plausible theory. No robbery ! Police files not available? What is being hidden? Do you really believe the Trump/Russia collusion BS? We know that Rod Wheeler ,the investigator, initially asserted thatRich was the leaker. Then he probably had second thoughts and decided that if he provided irrefutable proof, he could end up like Rich so he walked some of his words back. Who had the motive to have Rich eliminated if his actions were perceived as swinging the election? Are you not aware of how ruthless the Clinton machine is?
Could you be too trusting of the Clintons? America First!!!
Glaucon-they could not prove the story so they wit... (
show quote)
If Hannity and Fox had no proof that that the story was true, they would have been well advised to not have put it out in the first place.
I agree that if we rearranged the words in the original nonsense it could be made into a different story that would make Obama, Hillary, or George Soros responsible.
Glaucon wrote:
I am not a liberal and I don't know what liberals imagine....
You do a damn good imitation of one. Congratulations!
JW wrote:
You do a damn good imitation of one. Congratulations!
You seem to believe you know something about me.
Glaucon wrote:
If Hannity and Fox had no proof that that the story was true, they would have been well advised to not have put it out in the first place.
I agree that if we rearranged the words in the original nonsense it could be made into a different story that would make Obama, Hillary, or George Soros responsible.
Glaucon-agree fox probably should not have aired it. However, it was out there on the internet. You neglected to
answer my questions? What else makes sense? The Russia/Trump collusion is BS and a witch hunt and I believe
you know it. So why did Assange offer 20K? America First!!!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.