Are global warming deniers mentally unstable?
May 14, 2017 16:11:49 #
Chocura750 wrote:
Global warming deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the truth of global warming are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
Global warming has been dead for a long time. It's climate change now. If you can't keep up, you waste our time.
However I will inform you that among our many other talents, we have the ability to check credentials of your "scientists" and actually read their findings.
Your 97% who find a link between man and CC boils down to 12 people. The rest of your "scientists" found no such link but rather FEEL there is a connection.
Further, 30,000 scientists have signed the document that totally debunks CC and states why.
Your topic is a non-issue so go ahead and have a meaningful debate with.yourself.
If you can't even use the.proper term from your own party you fail even as a libprog.
May 14, 2017 16:33:53 #
viking747 wrote:
Chalkdust isn't a psychologist. he's probably a patient.
Maybe he is. A patient who thinks he is a doctor.
May 14, 2017 16:38:43 #
viking747 wrote:
Chalkdust isn't a psychologist. he's probably a patient.
Specimen.
May 14, 2017 17:15:59 #
Chocura750 wrote:
Global warming deniers all seem to have a particular specific they point to in support of their position. They avoid looking at the big picture. They believe there is a great conspiracy to prove them wrong. They claim scientists who believe in the truth of global warming are doing so for money and that these scientists have no integrity as do the deniers. All of these are signs of mental instability.
Hey troll boy.....go back to sleep and drown when those sea levels start to rise!!!!
May 14, 2017 17:52:26 #
You climate deniers post such nonsense, you could all be trump voters..
Spencer and Taylor have been debunked so often and for so long, it amazes me that they can still get published..
Do any of you read anything other then the right wing rags? How about Nature, NASA releases, the local newspaper, Science, Smithsonian or most any agriculture magazine...
It is a lost cause posting information for you guys.. But try this...
overwhelming.
The planet's temperature is rising
Sun setting behind city skyline
Trends in temperature readings from around the world show that global warming is taking place.
Every one of the past 40 years has been warmer than the 20th century average. 2016 was the hottest year on record. The 12 warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998.
Over the past 130 years, the global average temperature has increased 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit, with more than half of that increase occurring over only the past 35 years. The pattern is unmistakable: Every one of the past 40 years has been warmer than the 20th century average. 2016 was the hottest year on record. The 12 warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998.
Detailed measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels have been taken continuously for more than 50 years. The data show that CO2 levels have steadily increased every year. Today they are 25 percent higher than in 1957.
What's more, scientists have detailed records of past CO2 levels from ice core studies, which show that CO2 levels are higher today than at any point since our distant ancestors began migrating out of Africa 800,000 years ago.
But this information is not under dispute and you will simply call it a lie..
Of more concern to me, with the orange man fumbling around, we have a good chance that China will take over the leadership when the US abdicates the roll.
China Poised for Leadership on Climate Change After U.S. Reversal
President Trump’s executive order to dismantle Obama-era climate policy is unlikely to stall global momentum on the issue, as China’s growing role comes into focus.
VIEW IMAGES
Workers install solar panels on a rooftop in Wuhan, China, in a country where renewable energy is booming.
PHOTOGRAPH BY GIULIA MARCHI, THE NEW YORK TIMES, REDUX
By Christina Nunez
PUBLISHED MARCH 28, 2017
China may soon fill the leadership vacuum that President Donald Trump leaves on the world stage as he is expected to sign a new executive order Tuesday that seeks to dismantle much of the work on climate change enacted by his predecessor. That work was aimed at helping the United States meet its carbon emissions targets in the landmark Paris climate agreement.
Trump's order begins the process of rescinding the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era regulation of U.S. power plant emissions. It also takes steps to downplay the future costs of carbon emissions, walks back tracking of the federal government’s carbon emissions, rescinds a 2016 moratorium on coal leases on federal lands, and strikes down Obama-era executive orders and memoranda aimed at helping the country prepare for climate change's worst impacts, including its threats to national security.
Spencer and Taylor have been debunked so often and for so long, it amazes me that they can still get published..
Do any of you read anything other then the right wing rags? How about Nature, NASA releases, the local newspaper, Science, Smithsonian or most any agriculture magazine...
It is a lost cause posting information for you guys.. But try this...
overwhelming.
The planet's temperature is rising
Sun setting behind city skyline
Trends in temperature readings from around the world show that global warming is taking place.
Every one of the past 40 years has been warmer than the 20th century average. 2016 was the hottest year on record. The 12 warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998.
Over the past 130 years, the global average temperature has increased 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit, with more than half of that increase occurring over only the past 35 years. The pattern is unmistakable: Every one of the past 40 years has been warmer than the 20th century average. 2016 was the hottest year on record. The 12 warmest years on record have all occurred since 1998.
Detailed measurements of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels have been taken continuously for more than 50 years. The data show that CO2 levels have steadily increased every year. Today they are 25 percent higher than in 1957.
What's more, scientists have detailed records of past CO2 levels from ice core studies, which show that CO2 levels are higher today than at any point since our distant ancestors began migrating out of Africa 800,000 years ago.
But this information is not under dispute and you will simply call it a lie..
Of more concern to me, with the orange man fumbling around, we have a good chance that China will take over the leadership when the US abdicates the roll.
China Poised for Leadership on Climate Change After U.S. Reversal
President Trump’s executive order to dismantle Obama-era climate policy is unlikely to stall global momentum on the issue, as China’s growing role comes into focus.
VIEW IMAGES
Workers install solar panels on a rooftop in Wuhan, China, in a country where renewable energy is booming.
PHOTOGRAPH BY GIULIA MARCHI, THE NEW YORK TIMES, REDUX
By Christina Nunez
PUBLISHED MARCH 28, 2017
China may soon fill the leadership vacuum that President Donald Trump leaves on the world stage as he is expected to sign a new executive order Tuesday that seeks to dismantle much of the work on climate change enacted by his predecessor. That work was aimed at helping the United States meet its carbon emissions targets in the landmark Paris climate agreement.
Trump's order begins the process of rescinding the Environmental Protection Agency's Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era regulation of U.S. power plant emissions. It also takes steps to downplay the future costs of carbon emissions, walks back tracking of the federal government’s carbon emissions, rescinds a 2016 moratorium on coal leases on federal lands, and strikes down Obama-era executive orders and memoranda aimed at helping the country prepare for climate change's worst impacts, including its threats to national security.
May 14, 2017 17:55:32 #
May 14, 2017 19:48:35 #
permafrost wrote:
You climate deniers post such nonsense, you could ... (show quote)
How many times has NASA been caught lying and manipulating stats to support CC?
A. Several.
B. More.
C. Too many to count.
D. Even more when you include the NASA whistleblowers who admitted lying on their reports.
How many times does a federally funded agency have to be caught defrauding the people whose taxes pay their salaries, before they lose all credibility?
A. Once.
B. Once.
C. Once
When will you stop using CC shills as your resources?
A. Until we stop answering you.
B. Never.
C. Longer.
D. When Hell freezes over.
.(This has been scheduled for next Thursday.)
May 14, 2017 20:55:18 #
Chocura750 wrote:
Why are the global warming deniers so intense in their denials? What do they have to lose if they are wrong? Not much, but those that understand that the reality of global warming know that the whole planet may be lost if nothing is done.
I was still looking for the new ice age that was predicted in 1970's.
May 14, 2017 21:34:14 #
jeff smith wrote:
well, well, well. you ever hear that we were headi... (show quote)
Agreed~~cyclic change is just that and Our amazing Earth has done so since the beginning of her time.. Some suggest that is 5.6 billion years ago..
The idea that Global Warming is a natural cycle is well understood from paleo data covering the past 1 million years, again if agree with the Science on such.. Is there a difference between current climate, and the natural cycle? Sure there is yet not many talk about it because it doesn't support manmade climate change..The natural climate has oscillated between warm periods and ice ages.... This shifting in and out of warm periods and ice ages is correlated with what's called the Milankovitch cycles...In order to understand the difference between natural cycle and human-caused/influenced global warming, one needs to consider changes in radiative forcing and how this affects systems on Earth such as the atmosphere, vegetation, ice and snow, ocean chemistry and ocean heat content overturn cycles and related effects. The current radiative forcing levels are clearly outside of the natural cycle range....
Is global warming a natural cycle? Or is global warming affected by human influence? What does the science say? Depending on the government intent and the biggest investment money on the table you get forand against..In realty both have causation but man made has little to do with what Mother Natire does on her very own.. In the natural cycle, the world can warm, and cool, without any human interference. For the past million years this has occurred over and over again at approximately 100,000 year intervals. About 80-90,000 years of ice age with about 10-20,000 years of warm period, give or take some thousands of years....
So much propaganda has been put out to dupe not only We, but other Nations as well..
Follow the money and you learn who is directing what and why.. It's always about control and money.. And we buy into hook, line and sinker..
May 14, 2017 21:40:17 #
peter11937
Loc: NYS
Armagh wrote:
And someday, I hear, the sun will run out of nuclear fuel.
It will, but by then, there will be no one left on Earth, and if some are, that day they die in the explosion as the expanding explosion cleans all the mantle clean off the globe.
May 14, 2017 21:41:15 #
http://michellemalkin.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/icesheet.jpg
My favorite was several years ago when some UN sponsored alarmist group put out an aggregate of about 6 or 7 warming models (that all radically disagreed with each other) and said that the 'consensus' was, naturally, apocalyptic.
And then a real scientist tested the model aggregate by backing the data up 50 years and then adding the 50 years of data to see how close the model came to the present climate. Needless to say it wasn't close.
My favorite was several years ago when some UN sponsored alarmist group put out an aggregate of about 6 or 7 warming models (that all radically disagreed with each other) and said that the 'consensus' was, naturally, apocalyptic.
And then a real scientist tested the model aggregate by backing the data up 50 years and then adding the 50 years of data to see how close the model came to the present climate. Needless to say it wasn't close.
May 14, 2017 21:45:47 #
peter11937
Loc: NYS
permafrost wrote:
You climate deniers post such nonsense, you could ... (show quote)
Utter nonsense. We are having weather. That changes with the seasons and perfectly natural regular cycles. Get an education from source other than the Daily News or Newsday..
May 14, 2017 22:44:46 #
A lot of conversation about climate change, but no conversation about the destruction of the earth.
Trump will allow coal miners to put mine waste into streams. My live stock do not drink from that stream, why should I care?
Look at the destruction caused by the gulf oil spill. I don't live on the gulf, why should I care?
Trump is discouraging shutting down coal fired power plants. Why should I care? I moved away from there. It is now my ex-neighbors problem.
We should all care. We should not accept air so polluted it cannot be breathed, or water so contaminated it cannot be consumed.
Trump will allow coal miners to put mine waste into streams. My live stock do not drink from that stream, why should I care?
Look at the destruction caused by the gulf oil spill. I don't live on the gulf, why should I care?
Trump is discouraging shutting down coal fired power plants. Why should I care? I moved away from there. It is now my ex-neighbors problem.
We should all care. We should not accept air so polluted it cannot be breathed, or water so contaminated it cannot be consumed.
May 14, 2017 22:53:46 #
grace scott wrote:
A lot of conversation about climate change, but no... (show quote)
So... Nothing is being dumped into the streams now, but Trump is going to tell people to start...
Do you know just how silly that is?
http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/150810103359-01-colorado-river-spill-restricted-super-169.jpg
Here's what Obama did to the waterways.
May 14, 2017 23:07:25 #
Super Dave wrote:
So... Nothing is being dumped into the streams now, but Trump is going to tell people to start...
Do you know just how silly that is?
http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/150810103359-01-colorado-river-spill-restricted-super-169.jpg
Here's what Obama did to the waterways.
Do you know just how silly that is?
http://i2.cdn.cnn.com/cnnnext/dam/assets/150810103359-01-colorado-river-spill-restricted-super-169.jpg
Here's what Obama did to the waterways.
This was happening long before Obama came to the scene. He was trying to correct some of it. Trump decided that it did not need to be corrected because it would cost industry some of their profits. Regulations caused a lot of coal mines to close.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.