If i can't have it my way syndrome.
May 3, 2017 17:45:42 #
Progressive One wrote:
Okay..start with the specifics of my post and tell us how YOU can do ALL what I described at China Lake using your off-the-shelf controller instead of one designed from scratch like mine had to be.. Don't call names, produce what I asked you since it is that simple and easy to duplicate
It is easy...all I have to know is what model and serial number of radar or tracking device needs to be programmed....pick up the phone and ORDER a Modicon to do the specific job required! You just do not GET IT!!!!!! I have watched a complete Radar Unit be Built from nothing but a stack of metal stocks, and empty panel boxes...that each and every single component was made...by a real company that made real radar and sat communication dishes and systems.....and they have been doing that since 1971....and still make them. When I fly to New York for a night out on the town with my Wife and friends the owner of that company and his Wife almost always gets invited and they go right along with us...on NET JET! If you had any money...you can get a membership for so many hours of flight time a year.....it is amazing what $45,000.00 can do for travel without the bullshit of airport security and having to deal with loons...like you dip sticks that commercial flights put ya through!
Sorry to expose you once again.....anyone on this website can simply call the website that offers Modicon programmable modules...they will be told the same as I am posting here...it is all PLUG and PLAY.,...all of it.
May 3, 2017 17:51:52 #
Okay, use your real engineering release from those real employees who can answer the questions I posted relating to what had to be done on Endeavour and to the equipment used to test it. Also asked them what equipment had to be converted from DTL to TTL like I asked you. Also ask them what was Apollo-era equipment used to test Shuttles and what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web. Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for. You are running and getting certifications but you're not answering any questions. What is wrong?
May 3, 2017 18:03:03 #
America Only wrote:
It is easy...all I have to know is what model and ... (show quote)
Describe how it was done at China Lake....give me the specifics needed...hardware interfaces and controller interrupt routines written in the Motorola 68010 CPU's assembler language.. Try to even see if you can configure a modern day version. you're not given any specifics....you're trying to do like trump and weasel your way through....I didn't ask you about nothing but the radar system specifics......not all that other bullshit.....don't turn ADD on me....if you're stupid enough to think you could do off of the shelf that a project team in a laboratory was needed for..,where even the transmitters were designed from scratch........and track missiles and calibrate the thing with satellites that orbit the earth, which you will also need to test the validity of the system. I'm talking about a radar system that can track things in outer space as the re-enter the atmosphere...not what it costs to fly. Keep trying.
May 3, 2017 19:17:34 #
larry latimore wrote:
Trump supporters suffer from"the if I can't have it my way, I'll mess it up for every one else syndrome."that is why they elected an incompetent jackass for POTUS he said he would shake up Washington and he has ain't nothing but total chaos and calamity taking place in government what a joke trump has turned out too be he should be in the funny papers.
What is it like to be a sorry sack of shit. Or if you are just trolling, good job. But realize your "I'll mess it up for every one else" should be "I'll mess up anyone disagreeing with me". That's the way the people I talk to see it. They don't say it as a threat. It's more a promise.
Here is the reason, the libtard militia a video of their skill at the dump, west of Phoenix Oh I mean range west of Phoenix https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CywFbSdMVx0 See what I'm saying? You would shoot your self in the foot before you ever got started BUT DON'T LET ME DISCOURAGE YOU FROM YOUR DELUSION.
May 3, 2017 19:26:03 #
Progressive One wrote:
Okay, use your real engineering release from those... (show quote)
To remind everyone...while Mr. Wanna B Perfeser here was debating about the shuttle program his statement was they were all the same.....nothing new....I just posted a release to all engineering personnel what was improved since the older electronics on the newer shuttle Endeavour...which also at the time when YOU posted all this nonsense of yours using the name. KHH1 and then your other name....democrat 2016. NOW you state there WAS some difference but only in the TEST equipment....hahahah OHOHH EVERYTHING was different Nappy BOY in the newer shuttle regarding electronics and computer systems...NOT just the TEST equipment....hehehehehe HOHOH...
Lets see what I have now.......
A front page for a long tech sheet and release of the apollo systems...oh no...Nappy...who knew??????
May 3, 2017 19:35:37 #
Progressive One wrote:
Describe how it was done at China Lake....give me ... (show quote)
Another REAL release from those working on the shuttle...WHO KNEW?????!!!!!
May 3, 2017 19:37:56 #
I have BOXES of tech sheets...and things each and every single engineer working on the shuttle program...had to SIGN FOR!
Just sucks to be you....Mr Perfeser.....
Just sucks to be you....Mr Perfeser.....
May 3, 2017 19:43:15 #
Progressive One wrote:
Describe how it was done at China Lake....give me ... (show quote)
http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/68010/ Frigging plug and play for anyone that can read and fart at the same time...you are getting boring...the same processors are being talked about for use in some home game systems....which frigging 10 year olds are programming them and installing them.....
May 3, 2017 19:43:25 #
America Only wrote:
To remind everyone...while Mr. Wanna B Perfeser he... (show quote)
I didn't say ONLY the test equipment. You cannot find a post where I said ONLY anything. Find the post where I did. I asked a specific question about the Apollo era equipment that was upgraded. Everything I ask you never answer....you go dig up unrelated shit and then come back. If nothing else I remember the cargo bay was bigger on Endeavour.....I wasn't an assembly worker. I was a engineer working in a total different capacity.
Again ,
See if you can find it..you supposedly know so many people why can't you answer a direct question? Remember the Rockwell awards and accompany documents to say what they were for? Try again to answer the specific question and quit trying to sham your way through this. Get the people you always claim you have like you claim you have a copy of my license...haha.....
again:
Okay, use your real engineering release from those real employees who can answer the questions I posted relating to what had to be done on Endeavour with the equipment used to test it. Also ask them what equipment had to be converted from DTL to TTL like I asked you. Also ask them what was the Apollo-era equipment used to test Shuttles and what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web.
Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for. You are running and getting certifications but you're not answering any questions. What is wrong?
May 3, 2017 19:43:42 #
Progressive One wrote:
go ahead and roll with the janitor thing....I'll w... (show quote)
When did I ever mention the janitor thing, Professor Pendejo?
I never criticized upbringing, education, professional success or otherwise, I just questioned your claims to having had any of them.
May 3, 2017 19:46:02 #
Go home...Nappy...you can't come out and play with the BIG BOYS any more....!
May 3, 2017 19:46:16 #
Try to search for the answers to the specific questions. You may have to search the web another hour but if you knew so many Rockwell people you could get the answer immediately. You could also have them validate the kinds of awards they gave out and to which companies. Try again.....
May 3, 2017 19:51:07 #
Progressive One wrote:
I didn't say ONLY the test equipment. You cannot ... (show quote)
You can read...I posted tech sheets...those cover pages are for deep tech information...things YOU have already been asked and have not and cannot answer....and you will never answer them...because you are only a copy and paste type of person....unlike what PROOF I post all the time.....PROOF not just some words...Nappy...where are YOUR tech sheets about your so called work?????? YOU HAVE NONE!
Back to your porch...I have beat you down so badly...go home...call for a MEDIC before you bleed to death!
May 3, 2017 19:54:54 #
Progressive One wrote:
Try to search for the answers to the specific questions. You may have to search the web another hour but if you knew so many Rockwell people you could get the answer immediately. You could also have them validate the kinds of awards they gave out and to which companies. Try again.....
You have never worked on the Shuttle...EVER! I do not need to search for mumbo jumbo...from you...it would be like me merely stating...what wire was used to connect the first circuit in the left bank of the radar array systems.....withOUT having EVIDENCE that my answer would be correct...you have NO evidence...you never do...just you running your trap....all the time....so now lets see YOUR Tech released to prove even one sentence of a claim from you............well???.........................
May 3, 2017 19:55:04 #
Answer the specific questions. If you knew people and had so much without lying then digging for it, you could have been answered those questions...........you flunked on the radar controller and this because I'm speaking specifically from experience...not no general copied bullshit. Again:
for the shuttle:
. Ask them what portions of Shuttle Endeavour and associated test equipment had to be converted from Apollo-era DTL (Diode to Transistor) logic to TTL (Transistor to Transistor) logic and why. Also ask them what successful testing criteria consisted of. what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web. Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for.
For the radar controller
Describe how to interface a radar controller (all necessary interfaces) and then program it with interrupt-based routines in assembler language to address each specific phase of a radar tracking cycle. Now take that toy and figure out how to do that...better yet, call the vendor and see if that controller is even capable.....ask them what interface hardware is needed (for peripherals and a dedicated math board before on-board co-processor chips even came into being) and what software they can provide you to operate a system controller, A/D sampling circuitry that feeds an array processor board to perform at least a 128-point Fast Fourier Transform that will take radar returns from the receiver, change them from time to Doppler frequency domains and then use those returns and interface them to a digital shaft encoder that will provide real-time pedestal positioning data that aligns itself with missile trajectory...from the time of locking in on track until the missile flight is over and the pedestal returns to the stowed position.
for the shuttle:
. Ask them what portions of Shuttle Endeavour and associated test equipment had to be converted from Apollo-era DTL (Diode to Transistor) logic to TTL (Transistor to Transistor) logic and why. Also ask them what successful testing criteria consisted of. what in particular had to be brought back to life for testing on Endeavour. Funny I know these things and you cannot find them on the web. Ask them what did they use a old ass DEC PDP-11 mainframe for.
For the radar controller
Describe how to interface a radar controller (all necessary interfaces) and then program it with interrupt-based routines in assembler language to address each specific phase of a radar tracking cycle. Now take that toy and figure out how to do that...better yet, call the vendor and see if that controller is even capable.....ask them what interface hardware is needed (for peripherals and a dedicated math board before on-board co-processor chips even came into being) and what software they can provide you to operate a system controller, A/D sampling circuitry that feeds an array processor board to perform at least a 128-point Fast Fourier Transform that will take radar returns from the receiver, change them from time to Doppler frequency domains and then use those returns and interface them to a digital shaft encoder that will provide real-time pedestal positioning data that aligns itself with missile trajectory...from the time of locking in on track until the missile flight is over and the pedestal returns to the stowed position.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.