Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA

LOL ---

Like all lefties, you think that it's not really racism to hate whites...

Ve'hoe

Because racism is not a platform of either "party",,,, but as an american indian, I will say that Conservatives,,
are the least racist people,,,,, liberals are the worst,,,,,

Conservatives will give you the respect and credit you are due, and allow you to stand as a man,, Liberals always want to treat you as a child,, condescending,, telling you what you should think, who you should hate, and that they alone will help you, but they never do...... as though the color of your skin was the measure of your intelligence and capabilities,,, with the answer ALWAYS being,, you NEED them..

Thats my experience being red,,, and the most racist people on earth??? American Blacks..

Armagh

It is part of the Leftist/Liberal modus operandi: If you can't beat 'em, smear 'em.

Cool Breeze

[quote=4430]O I will never stop drinking Lemming Aid as you put it >>> take notice I spelt it like you did so you'd be able to understand it <<< I especially the pure stuff with all the pulp in it !

It's sooooo much better than Cool Aid that them thar demo's pass out !

LOL Hmmmm not much information can be written in a book with only one page in it ![/quote}

Next week we will teach you how to read page two.

Cool Breeze

You should be ashamed of yourself claiming to be a Native American. You sir are a G.N.A.T. Great Native American Toady aka Rotten Apple

Cool Breeze

That the problem if the alt-white. They have a bad habit of telling people how and what they think. You can shove it

Big Bass

You are a RACIST!!

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

[quote=Cool Breeze][quote=4430]O I will never stop drinking Lemming Aid as you put it >>> take notice I spelt it like you did so you'd be able to understand it <<< I especially the pure stuff with all the pulp in it !

It's sooooo much better than Cool Aid that them thar demo's pass out !

LOL Hmmmm not much information can be written in a book with only one page in it ![/quote}

Next week we will teach you how to read page two.[/quote]







What language did you write your book if it isn't English I'm too old to learn any other language ?

Kinda hard to teach someone how to read your book when one doesn't have the book in the first place !

Armagh

He might be a racist, but first and foremost, CB is a child, with only a child's ability to reason.

markinny

you could not join cool.

Big Bass

You grant him far more than he's earned. A child has an appealing naivete. He is an obnoxious racist.

Armagh

I would call him, rather, a "sensationalist". I don't think he's a racist so much as he says those things to get a rise out of people.

Big Bass

"A rose by any other name..."

Armagh

Good point.

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

Good Afternoon, Linda. Happy Sunday!

Aw, Jeeze, not the 'racism' thing again. Why me? OK, because it's you I'll bite; let's start with a definition, shall we?

Racism:
Prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one's own race is superior.

Note the 'superiority' aspect. The 'I'm better than you because I'm (insert race here)' attitude. Without the superiority aspect, it's not strictly racism. This is what really grinds my grits when these fools go spraying the word RACISM!!!! around without even knowing what they're saying. What they're basically doing is accusing me (or you, or anybody) of having a 'superiority complex'. And the real kicker is it always comes right after you prove to them that their (insert statement here) is completely senseless. Your argument is superior, therefore you must think that you are superior. Hence. you're a racist. When you look at it from that standpoint, it dies kinda make some twisted sense.

Of course, calling somebody a racist is just assigning them a label. Labels are not a good thing in my experience. They are way too generalized and can be redefined way too easily. Remember when it was 'fun' to be 'gay'? Using that word now refers to a sexual preference. How did that happen? How did it become sexually perverse to be 'gay'? Don't even start me on a pair of 'boobs'...

So, yeah, to answer the question, it does matter how people are labeled. Labeling an individual is to 'dehumanize' that person. You are placing them in a neat little box marked (insert label here). I consider that wrong. To label a group may or may not be appropriate. For instance, take the Nazis... Whoa!! OK! OK! Just kidding! Please put the knife down, Linda!! (Changing the subject real quick...) Take the Democrats (no, please, just take them). They label themselves as being 'progressive'. According to them, they believe that government should perform a prominent role in helping American citizens "progress" further in their economic security. Hence they're 'progressives'. Don't laugh, this is their label, assigned by them, for themselves. To anyone with some knowledge of political systems, their methodologies in 'helping Americans secure their economic security' look a lot like socialism. But they know that Americans are leery about socialists, so they change their label to 'progressive', and offer to help us all with our economic futures. The more politically naive among us look at this and give it credence because it's not called 'socialism' and anyway, 'free stuff'.

Let's look at another label: 'Liberal'. This has got to be one of the most abused words in the entire lexicon of the world from the first word spoken to today. Originally, to be a liberal was to be in favor of constitutionally limited government and against political interference in the marketplace. The nearest approximation in today's parlance to an 18th century liberal would be a libertarian. The word 'liberal' has been crunched, chewed, twisted, spat out and run over so many times that it bears no resemblance to it's original meaning. Today's liberal is a card carrying, no holds barred, dyed in the wool socialist with communist tendencies. Today's liberal has absolutely no resemblance to the liberal of the 18th and early 19th centuries.

So yeah, labels. I won't hand them out and most certainly won't wear one. Now you know why.