Even the stupid eventually get the message.
WND EXCLUSIVE
Big List: Now scientists want U.S. out of U.N. climate agency
Three hundred scientists have written to President Donald Trump asking him to pull the United States out of the global warming campaign that is being run by the United Nations.
According to The Hill, the letter explains, “Since 2009, the U.S. and other governments have undertaken actions with respect to global climate that are not scientifically justified and that already have, and will continue to cause serious social and economic harm – with no environmental benefits.
“While we support effective, affordable, reasonable and direct controls on conventional environmental pollutants, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. To the contrary, there is clear evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful to food crops and other plants that nourish all life. It is plant food, not poison,” the letter says.
Semper
Fidelis
georgejc wrote:
WND EXCLUSIVE
Big List: Now scientists want U.S. out of U.N. climate agency
Three hundred scientists have written to President Donald Trump asking him to pull the United States out of the global warming campaign that is being run by the United Nations.
According to The Hill, the letter explains, “Since 2009, the U.S. and other governments have undertaken actions with respect to global climate that are not scientifically justified and that already have, and will continue to cause serious social and economic harm – with no environmental benefits.
“While we support effective, affordable, reasonable and direct controls on conventional environmental pollutants, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. To the contrary, there is clear evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful to food crops and other plants that nourish all life. It is plant food, not poison,” the letter says.
Semper
Fidelis
WND EXCLUSIVE br Big List: Now scientists want U.S... (
show quote)
Now that
grant money may no longer be contingent with supporting the progressive/Establishment
narrative, maybe we'll start to hear from scientists who have been reluctant to publicly disagree.
georgejc wrote:
WND EXCLUSIVE
Big List: Now scientists want U.S. out of U.N. climate agency
Three hundred scientists have written to President Donald Trump asking him to pull the United States out of the global warming campaign that is being run by the United Nations.
According to The Hill, the letter explains, “Since 2009, the U.S. and other governments have undertaken actions with respect to global climate that are not scientifically justified and that already have, and will continue to cause serious social and economic harm – with no environmental benefits.
“While we support effective, affordable, reasonable and direct controls on conventional environmental pollutants, carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. To the contrary, there is clear evidence that increased atmospheric carbon dioxide is environmentally helpful to food crops and other plants that nourish all life. It is plant food, not poison,” the letter says.
Semper
Fidelis
WND EXCLUSIVE br Big List: Now scientists want U.S... (
show quote)
Liberals are blinded and incapable of reasoning truth beyond what they are told by their devious leaders.
The simplicity in carbon dioxide being a benefit to our earth is and has been factual proven. YouTube has multiple scientists explaining man-made vs the earth's climate shifts (natural changes ) which can be chaos for centuries or millennium, and then have patterns (macro/micro ). Which is why the computer models liberals continue to circle around, continue to not produce expected results.
Liberals ("if") they could read and rationalize what non liberal scientists have written, explaining why the liberal scientists have skewed the math in order to publish reports that support the devious, power hungering, leftist agenda.
People need to understand the difference between hypothesis, theory and fact.
Hypothesis is speculative and based on no fact at all; as an example, continental drift i.e. that the continents drifted back and forth over a period of 4 billion years and that Africa was really apart of South America. Not an iota of evidence supports this. It is plain bull.
Theory is speculative and based on incomplete evidence; as an example, evolution which has some basis for being factual, but which is inconclusive with wide gaps of misinformation, or no information at all.
Fact is fact. Based entirely on evidence which is complete.
Hypothesis and Theory are based upon faith, and is just a form of secular religion. Just faith, and a poor one at that.
Want to be sure.
"I am the way and the truth and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through Me. John 14:6
Semper Fidelis
Super Dave wrote:
http://www.stgeorgeparish.org/media/1/bingo.jpg
...and Bingo was his name-o!
georgejc wrote:
People need to understand the difference between hypothesis, theory and fact.
Hypothesis is speculative and based on no fact at all; as an example, continental drift i.e. that the continents drifted back and forth over a period of 4 billion years and that Africa was really apart of South America. Not an iota of evidence supports this. It is plain bull.
Theory is speculative and based on incomplete evidence; as an example, evolution which has some basis for being factual, but which is inconclusive with wide gaps of misinformation, or no information at all.
Fact is fact. Based entirely on evidence which is complete.
Hypothesis and Theory are based upon faith, and is just a form of secular religion. Just faith, and a poor one at that.
Want to be sure.
"I am the way and the truth and the life, and no one comes to the Father except through Me. John 14:6
Semper Fidelis
People need to understand the difference between h... (
show quote)
You say fact is fact, yet you deny evidence of continental drift?? I'd say, Jesus and Lord Gawd himself is laughing at that one!!!
Produce the evidence for an event that occurred 3.5 million years ago. We cannot even accurately carbon date organic material more than 30,000 thousand years, and half that data is often subject to contamination. We can't even explain why a woman's gestation period is nine months, while a rabbit's is only 30 days. We don't understand why the heart beats, though we know it is through electric charges. And, we cannot explain what happen to the dinosaurs. If it was due to a meteor, why has no residual of the same source ever been produced. As fact, modern science has a long way to go.
georgejc wrote:
Produce the evidence for an event that occurred 3.5 million years ago. We cannot even accurately carbon date organic material more than 30,000 thousand years, and half that data is often subject to contamination. We can't even explain why a woman's gestation period is nine months, while a rabbit's is only 30 days. We don't understand why the heart beats, though we know it is through electric charges. And, we cannot explain what happen to the dinosaurs. If it was due to a meteor, why has no residual of the same source ever been produced. As fact, modern science has a long way to go.
Produce the evidence for an event that occurred 3.... (
show quote)
Larry, or Nikolai. Which is it??
nwtk2007 wrote:
You say fact is fact, yet you deny evidence of continental drift?? I'd say, Jesus and Lord Gawd himself is laughing at that one!!!
Continental Drift?
Damn... We need new laws to stop that..
RE: FACT IS FACT
This is another bravura display of vehemence being conflated with truth.
Science is about theory. Nothing is called fact. Gravitation, e.g, is a theory. Newton's explanation of gravity stood until Einstien's theory showed its shortcoming. Science still uses Evolution, because no science has shown it incorrect. Carbon dioxide is not "poison." It is a gas that traps heat in the atmosphere. This has been demonstrated to be true. If you can prove otherwise, have at it. At this moment in history, the production of carbon dioxide greatly exceeds the natural means of breaking it down or altering it. Can you disprove that?
Consequently carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere have reached levels such that there is more heating than albedo effects can equalize. Can you disprove that?
Your 300 "scientists" are probably of two kinds; whores who will lie for money, and bozos who took a science class in their third freshman year in college. Care to post the bona fides of your scientists? Incidently, if you include all the branches of science from astronomy to zoology, there are several tens of thousands of scientists in the US alone.
Let the mindless sling their darts. You have heard the truth. Accept it or quit your squaking.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.