One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: Quality service!
Main
God is Energy
Page <<first <prev 23 of 31 next> last>>
Jan 9, 2017 00:23:04   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
susanblange wrote:
The Hebrew word for soul is "nephesh" and it means "life". The blood is the life of the flesh. "Soul" is a biblical word for "body" and earth is the "land of the living". All animals have souls. What they don't have is a human spirit and that is what lives on after the death of the body/soul. Although it's possible, animals don't go to Heaven. Ecclesiastes 3:21. "Who knoweth the spirit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth?"
The Hebrew word for soul is "nephesh" an... (show quote)



The book of Job, the oldest book in the Bible, teaches that animals have no soul.

It also clearly teaches that animals do not go to heaven.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 00:26:31   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
Emanuel is Hebrew. It means¨God with us.¨ It is one of Jesus´ names, or titles.



susanblange wrote:
@ Zemirah: You are cherry picking and taking verse out of context. I will give you an example: Isaiah 7:10-16. Verse 14-"virgin" is a mistranslation. The Hebrew word is "almah" and it means "maiden" or "young woman". I might add that virgin births are said to have happened in the past, but the offspring are always female. The verse also says she would call the name of the child Emanuel. This is not Jesus's name. It continues on in verses 15 and 16. "Butter and honey shall he eat, that he may know to refuse the evil and choose the good. For before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of both her kings". If you read the entire paragraph, you can see it wasn't fulfilled.
..
@ Zemirah: You are cherry picking and taking verse... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 02:22:45   #
tradexpertbuysell
 
Zemirah wrote:
These are the words of Jesus that have been cut into splintered partial sentences???? To what end?

Matthew 24:24: ¨For false Christs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders that would deceive even the elect, if that were possible.


24:29: Immediately after the tribulation of those days: ‘The sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken.’


24:31: And He will send out His angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather His elect from the four winds,from one end of the heavens to the other.…


There are thousands of books written by devout, sincere Christians arguing in favor of either pre-trib, mid-trib or post-trib.

Very few have changed their mind, based on someone elses opinion, after seriously studying the scriptures for themselves, and very few ever will.

Most intelligent individuals, do, however, read the entire sentences, paragraphs, chapters...

Your opinion is your own.

They know not, nor do they discern, for he has shut their eyes, so that they cannot see, and their hearts, so that they cannot understand. Isaiah 44:18
These are the words of Jesus that have been cut in... (show quote)


My point was to communicate by just focusing on the key words that Jesus himself state as the ultimate authority of authority and the order in which he ordered his own thoughts in the sequence of actual events and actions.

What other men have written is irrelevant when standing up to the good Lord's TRUTH and ordered by HIS own perfectly thought process. (Emphasis in upper CASE)

So what's your point when you're actually agreeing with his own words and making my and HIS own witness true.

So what's your point? I'm afraid you've lost me there my friend when the self evident truth in JESUS' own words is the essential and ultimate witness of so called post trib.

You're making the topic more complicated with "much words" when just common sense and a lot fewer words will do!

Now if you want to take it further then take it up with my friend as I suggested earlier who doesn't use the internet but would be perfectly willing to discuss it with his own hand if you have an anonymous PO box address.

KIS (Keep It Simple) please and either take it up with him or change the subject!

I have written what I have written and as far as I'm concerned that discussion you need to now take up further, if you're interested with my friend and spiritual mentor Randy.

With all due respect and sincerity,

Dave

Reply
Check out topic: What so many do not know....
Jan 9, 2017 12:11:06   #
Morgan
 
Wolf counselor wrote:
Job 28:28 “And unto man he said, Behold, the fear of the LORD, that is wisdom; and to depart from evil is understanding."


I believe that is true, with understanding, we do eliminate evil, with that said I also don't believe in fearing God, but instead to try and surrender to god's guidance. Many believe God is our savior and our punish-er, I don't presume this to be true, I hold the opinion that what you put out comes back to you.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 13:29:33   #
susanblange Loc: USA
 
Zemirah wrote:
Emanuel is Hebrew. It means¨God with us.¨ It is one of Jesus´ names, or titles.


Jarrett Lawrence Emanuel was born on April 4, 1984. This is the exact date given on page 6 of George Orwell's novel, 1984. His mother, Vicki lived and worked at the Jefferson hotel while she was pregnant with him, until he was born. His parents were separated at the time, and in the process of getting divorced. Vicki kept her marital name and also named her son Emanuel. Jarrett is Joshua in Hebrew, the same as Jesus in Greek, and it means "Lord is salvation". Jarrett was raised in the Christian faith.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 13:46:25   #
Morgan
 
tradexpertbuysell wrote:
OK I'm back
Pre trib nonsense as in horse do do...Feel good religion...Bull dukie, etc.,.

Watch the word "elect" and verse sequence as follows:

Mathew 24:24 "they shall decieve the very ELECT..."
Mathew 24:29 "IMMEDIATELY AFTER the tribulation...."
Mathew 24:31"And he shall send his angels...And they shall gather together his ELECT..."

Sounds like post trib to me in my humble opinion...Where am I going wrong if pre trib is true?
OK I'm back br Pre trib nonsense as in horse do do... (show quote)



Feel good religion verses conditioned traditional feel bad, guilt ridden religion? maybe we should think of the reasons that make us feel good. If it is loving and forgiving, and doing for others, as you were trying to do with your homeless man, and a very honorable thing to do,well does that put us on the wrong track? No of course not . Feel good religion as you say doesn't make anyone immune to hardships and difficulties, but it does have to do with understanding, as was quoted by Wolf a few posts ago.

Feeling good and bad is a discipline tactic, when we do good we the expansion of oneness with the whole, and we feel good, we like feeling good about ourselves, so we are apt to do it again, and again, soon a new way of life(pattern) is formed one out of goodness; when instead if we act out in bad and selfish intention, that goes to our inner core, deep down to our inner soul which than has a dark cloud and we feel badly about ourselves, even when we don't show it to the outside world. All this is already set by our divine source without raising a hand of punishment, we've already done it to ourselves through self infliction and negative action.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 14:28:38   #
tradexpertbuysell
 
Morgan wrote:
Feel good religion verses conditioned traditional feel bad, guilt ridden religion? maybe we should think of the reasons that make us feel good. If it is loving and forgiving, and doing for others, as you were trying to do with your homeless man, and a very honorable thing to do,well does that put us on the wrong track? No of course not . Feel good religion as you say doesn't make anyone immune to hardships and difficulties, but it does have to do with understanding, as was quoted by Wolf a few posts ago.

Feeling good and bad is a discipline tactic, when we do good we the expansion of oneness with the whole, and we feel good, we like feeling good about ourselves, so we are apt to do it again, and again, soon a new way of life(pattern) is formed one out of goodness; when instead if we act out in bad and selfish intention, that goes to our inner core, deep down to our inner soul which than has a dark cloud and we feel badly about ourselves, even when we don't show it to the outside world. All this is already set by our divine source without raising a hand of punishment, we've already done it to ourselves through self infliction and negative action.
Feel good religion verses conditioned traditional ... (show quote)


Most times death doesn't feel good either

Reply
 
 
Jan 9, 2017 16:29:38   #
susanblange Loc: USA
 
Zemirah wrote:
Any cherry picking being done is on your part, not on mine. You are grasping at straws.

Virgin is NOT a mistranslation. Virgin is the word used in the Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Tanakh made from the Hebrew, commonly in use in the first century. It was translated by seventy (or seventy-two) Jewish scholars at Alexandria, Egypt during the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus (285-247 B.C.) The name of the "Septuagint¨ - Greek translation of the Tanakh is from the Latin septuaginta, meaning "seventy," and it is frequently referred to by the roman numerals LXX.

The Septuagint, - the earliest version of the Old Testament Scriptures which is extant (in existence), or of which we possess any certain knowledge, is this Greek translation executed at Alexandria in the third century before the Christian era. The Hebrew version of the Old Testament from which it was translated was replaced by the Jewish scribes and scholars after the rise of Christianity, by a new translation of the Hebrew, rather than continuing to use the Septuagint now shared by the Christian Jews and Gentiles.

The Apostles commonly used the Septuagint Old Testament, for Jesus also had predominantly quoted from the Septuagint (Greek Old Testament). They used it because it was the Jewish made version in general use in the first century when they wrote, as everyone (both Jew and Gentile) spoke the common (koine) Greek at that time.

They used what was already familiar to the ears of converted Hellenists. In fact, they used it as did their contemporary Jewish writers and historians, Philo and Josephus.

"The veneration with which the Jews had treated the Septuagint (as is shown in the case of Philo and Josephus, as they both quoted from the Septuagint), gave place to a very contrary feeling when they realized how it could be used against them to prove Christ´s deity, in debates with the Christians: hence they forsook the Septuagint, and sought to deprive it of all authority.

Previous to this, it was the Word of God as they were concerned. But as soon as the early Christians started using it, they tried to discredit the Septuagint. As the Gentile Christians fully embraced its authority and inspiration, they necessarily regarded the new denial on the part of the Jews of its accuracy, as little less than blasphemy, and as proof of their deliberate blindness."

The Jews upheld the Septuagint very strongly for the first 300 years of its existence as the Word of God, but because the Christians were able to use the messianic prophecies within it, as proof that Jesus was the Messiah, the Jews subsequently rejected it. The Jews then started rewriting the Septuagint in the 2nd and 3rd centuries A.D., to better suit their own convictions.

They changed the word virgin to almah, meaning maiden, however, because, at that time, in that culture, if found not to be a virgin a young woman or maiden would commonly be stoned, it is a moot point.

To be a maiden was to be a virgin.

They were, in effect, "Making the word of God of none effect through their men´s tradition " just as Jesus had said. (Mark 7:13).
Any cherry picking being done is on your part, not... (show quote)


What you're saying, is that the Septuagint is a version that was written by Christians. What you accuse the Jews of doing, "to suit their own convictions", is what the Christians did. It was written in Greek, the original language of the NT. It is best to be able to read the OT in the original Hebrew, but it is a very imprecise language. There are only about 5000 words in the Hebrew language and each word can have several different meanings. That is one of the reasons why there are so many different English translations of the Bible. There are also tens of thousands of Christian denominations, and instead of interpreting the scriptures, they change them to fit their own beliefs.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 16:43:26   #
susanblange Loc: USA
 
Zemirah wrote:
Satan was a created Archangel, who chose to rebel against God, wishing himself to be God.

Adam was the first man. He was created in the image of God, which is to say he was a reflection of God, who is spirit.

Adam was NEVER the same as God.


Satan was never an arch angel. To become an arch angel, you have to be holy. Cherubim are created spiritual beings and they kept God company. We were all created in the image of God. God is a person, and has both a soul and a spirit, just like all of mankind. Adam went to Heaven when he died, and his name was changed to Satan. He has been kicked out of Heaven and reincarnated as the father of the Messiah. Adam was God's only literal biological son, and he's the only one who could genetically bring Messiah/God into the world. In the book of Job, we find Satan in Heaven, and he is called "son of God".

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 18:45:09   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
The claim that God´s Word copies paganism is one of Satan´s most common lies.

I have in my personal home library over 6,000 books on the history of the earth, the civilizations of man and the history of religion.

I studied these lies and claims about pagan writings in great detail and rejected them over thirty five years ago.

You, madam, are a late study. -

For your insulting language is far less than godly, from you, who has claimed to live a perfect sinless life - as you have claimed in one of your pages under this topic.

God´s Word says that he who says he is without sin is a liar.

It is NOT possible to have a serious or civil discourse with someone such as yourself, who falsely claims to be a prophet of God, while repeatedly contradicting and mindlessly twisting His Sacred Written Scriptures.

God, the Holy Spirit NEVER contradicts His own previously revealed Word, NOT in private revelations, to you, or to anyone else.

I have lived continually in the light of God´s revealed Word as a light to my path, not perfectly and never without sinning, but always knowing that as a believer and follower of Jesus Christ, I am eternally forgiven.

God sees when he looks at me or any other follower of Jesus the Christ, the acceptable and protective covering provided by Jesus´ shed blood on Calvary. It is finished.

There is NO OTHER NAME under heaven by which you may be saved.

Your Astrological reference to Libra and the Messiah displays staggering spiritual blindness.

In the book of Genesis, worship of the stars and planets began as rebellion against God with Nimrod and the Tower of Babel four generations after Noah.

God denounces such false Astrological beliefs repeatedly throughout the Jewish Scriptures, yet you profess belief in Astrological symbols.

This is NOT of God.


susanblange wrote:
Where have you been living? Under a rock? I wish I had a link that will prove Christianity is idolatry and everything about him was copied from other pagan, so called "gods". These include the virgin birth, his alleged date of birth, (BTW the Messiah was supposed to be a Libra), and the alleged "resurrection". There are many, many, more. You may be able to find it if you google it.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 19:49:14   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
FYI: This is an online forum intended for the exchange of opinions and online informational resources.

I first read the entire Bible through at the age of nine, when I was in the 4th grade, over sixty years ago.

There is absolutely no need for me to give any unknown 3rd party referred by another forum member my private post office box address in order to receive information that is supposedly not readily available through God´s written word!!!

That sounds VERY CULTISH!!! This is what you wish me to do? No, thank you.

All of the Apostles Words in the Scriptures are ¨Jesus words,¨ - for just as He promised them in John 16:12-15, the Holy Spirit would give them, through inspiration, the words of Jesus, who is the Living Logos, enabling them to write the entire New Testament, which was still future at that time.

John 16:12: “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now.

13 When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.

14 He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you.

15 All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.¨

ALL Jesus words are KEY words.

The Bible, in its composition, is a beautiful mosaic.

To understand any subject in the Scriptures, it is necessary to consider every verse pertaining to that subject, omitting not one word, and thereby receiving a complete picture of God´s instruction on the matter under consideration.

Key words alone give only a vague outline, signifying nothing actionable.

In an earlier post on this Topic, I recited the major verses of inspired Scripture which teach the Pre-Tribulation Rapture of all God´s redeemed in Jesus Christ.

The Scriptures say what they say. They will not change.

We each choose what we believe, which is as intended, for God will not violate our free will.


tradexpertbuysell wrote:
My point was to communicate by just focusing on the key words that Jesus himself state as the ultimate authority of authority and the order in which he ordered his own thoughts in the sequence of actual events and actions.

What other men have written is irrelevant when standing up to the good Lord's TRUTH and ordered by HIS own perfectly thought process. (Emphasis in upper CASE)

So what's your point when you're actually agreeing with his own words and making my and HIS own witness true.

So what's your point? I'm afraid you've lost me there my friend when the self evident truth in JESUS' own words is the essential and ultimate witness of so called post trib.

You're making the topic more complicated with "much words" when just common sense and a lot fewer words will do!

Now if you want to take it further then take it up with my friend as I suggested earlier who doesn't use the internet but would be perfectly willing to discuss it with his own hand if you have an anonymous PO box address.

KIS (Keep It Simple) please and either take it up with him or change the subject!

I have written what I have written and as far as I'm concerned that discussion you need to now take up further, if you're interested with my friend and spiritual mentor Randy.

With all due respect and sincerity,

Dave
My point was to communicate by just focusing on th... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 20:13:58   #
tradexpertbuysell
 
Zemirah wrote:
FYI: This is an online forum intended for the exchange of opinions and online informational resources.

I first read the entire Bible through at the age of nine, when I was in the 4th grade, over sixty years ago.

There is absolutely no need for me to give any unknown 3rd party referred by another forum member my private post office box address in order to receive information that is supposedly not readily available through God´s written word!!!

That sounds VERY CULTISH!!! This is what you wish me to do? No, thank you.

All of the Apostles Words in the Scriptures are ¨Jesus words,¨ - for just as He promised them in John 16:12-15, the Holy Spirit would give them, through inspiration, the words of Jesus, who is the Living Logos, enabling them to write the entire New Testament, which was still future at that time.

John 16:12: “I still have many things to say to you, but you cannot bear them now.

13 When the Spirit of truth comes, he will guide you into all the truth, for he will not speak on his own authority, but whatever he hears he will speak, and he will declare to you the things that are to come.

14 He will glorify me, for he will take what is mine and declare it to you.

15 All that the Father has is mine; therefore I said that he will take what is mine and declare it to you.¨

ALL Jesus words are KEY words.

The Bible, in its composition, is a beautiful mosaic.

To understand any subject in the Scriptures, it is necessary to consider every verse pertaining to that subject, omitting not one word, and thereby receiving a complete picture of God´s instruction on the matter under consideration.

Key words alone give only a vague outline, signifying nothing actionable.

In an earlier post on this Topic, I recited the major verses of inspired Scripture which teach the Pre-Tribulation Rapture of all God´s redeemed in Jesus Christ.

The Scriptures say what they say. They will not change.

We each choose what we believe, which is as intended, for God will not violate our free will.
FYI: This is an online forum intended for the exch... (show quote)


I'm disappointed in you actually I am shocked.

No further comment

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 21:32:59   #
Zemirah Loc: Sojourner En Route...
 
It is not your right to put words in my mouth that I did not say. I accused no one of anything.

Your reaction to the historical information I related about the Septuagint is peculiar and defensive?

The historical truth is the historical truth.

The Septuagint was transcribed by Jewish scribes, from the Hebrew text between 285 - 246 B.C., i.e., 285 to 246 years Before Christ was born, again, by Jewish scribes.

Because the ancient Samaritan text and the ancient Dead Sea Scrolls Bible are in agreement with the
Septuagint and with each other, whereas the contemporary Masoretic/Hebrew text differs from all three in many instances, it is the Hebrew text that was changed, NOT the Septuagint.

This information is common knowledge to Bible scholars, and the evidence is openly available to anyone seeking the truth.

It is obvious that the Hebrew text of the Jewish Tanakh used by the Jewish scribes to transcribe the Septuagint was copied from an older, no longer extant (no longer in existence) version of the Hebrew Scriptures/Tanakh.

The majority of the quotes from the Jewish Tanakh/Old Testament written in the New Testament by the predominantly Jewish Apostles and the Jewish Jesus are from the text of the commonly used and widely accepted Greek language, Septuagint/Old Testament (which had been in use by the Jewish people for over three hundred years at that time), rather than from any Hebrew text.

The reason the older Hebrew text disappeared and the reason the contemporary Masoretic/Hebrew text were changed is explained by Jewish scholars, including Jewish Rabbi, Professor Jacob Neusner, the editor of the latest edition of the prestigious Encyclopedia Judaica.

I have in my library several of his books, including Judaism in the Matrix of Christianity, Copywrite 1985, and Death and Birth of Judaism. Copywrite 1986.

He was a professor at Brown University at the time he wrote these.

Take your quarrel up with him.


susanblange wrote:
What you're saying, is that the Septuagint is a version that was written by Christians. What you accuse the Jews of doing, "to suit their own convictions", is what the Christians did. It was written in Greek, the original language of the NT. It is best to be able to read the OT in the original Hebrew, but it is a very imprecise language. There are only about 5000 words in the Hebrew language and each word can have several different meanings. That is one of the reasons why there are so many different English translations of the Bible. There are also tens of thousands of Christian denominations, and instead of interpreting the scriptures, they change them to fit their own beliefs.
What you're saying, is that the Septuagint is a ve... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 21:37:03   #
Morgan
 
tradexpertbuysell wrote:
Most times death doesn't feel good either


How do you know, death is a transition back to our spiritual world.

Reply
Jan 9, 2017 22:26:02   #
tradexpertbuysell
 
Morgan wrote:
How do you know, death is a transition back to our spiritual world.


We were talking about feeling good vs not feeling good.

So I was contrasting death with that condition as a contrast in order to put things back into proper perspective.

In other words, sometimes as a minister or church leader they may be doing their followers a disservice if they don't challenge them. Or worse yet compromise in order to keep or increase membership, increase church collection size, etc.

I confess that "feel good religion" may have been a bad choice of words on my part. The above is actually closer to what I meant.

The "feel good" anology was my awkward way of saying if church members are morally drifting it is one of the ministry's duties to correct or warn least the blood would be on their own hands as well as the transgressors well being.

Does that make sense?

Incidentally that is one reason I could never be a minister since that is a very terrible and awesome responsibility.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 23 of 31 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.