Podesta: The Election Was Not Free And Fair
Dec 19, 2016 15:10:29 #
Theres a real story there that's why keep them looking in another direction slide of hand,And now there scared all those email will see the light of day now Elect Trumps in officially
Dec 19, 2016 15:17:06 #
archie bunker wrote:
I guess it wasn't free and fair because the dirt leaked out, and people were allowed to analyze it in order to help make their own decisions?
I guess you are right...Nothing is free~~~
As of 37 minures ago 75 for Trump, 27 hillary...
Dec 19, 2016 15:37:19 #
At this point "What difference does it make" who, or whether they were hackedor leaked contents is undeniable! They should have stayed on the .gov and your queen might have won!!!!
Check out topic: Biden Administration Abandons Israel, Empowers Enemies
Dec 19, 2016 15:41:16 #
Dec 19, 2016 15:44:54 #
lindajoy wrote:
I guess you are right...Nothing is free~~~
As of 37 minures ago 75 for Trump, 27 hillary...
As of 37 minures ago 75 for Trump, 27 hillary...
Ladies and Gentlemen...it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you the newly elected POTUS...President Donald J Trump.
Dec 19, 2016 15:45:18 #
200MPHTape wrote:
At this point "What difference does it make" who, or whether they were hackedor leaked contents is undeniable! They should have stayed on the .gov and your queen might have won!!!!
Who hacked is immaterial to the contents they contained...Where's the outrage from the Dems demanding answers...
The big money buyers are certainly asking what happened and are rather upset...Of course all for a different reason, those billions gone for nothing...
Dec 19, 2016 15:46:56 #
Sons of Liberty wrote:
Ladies and Gentlemen...it gives me great pleasure to introduce to you the newly elected POTUS...President Donald J Trump.
Howwww sawwwwwweeeet it is!!
Hallelujah!!!!!
President Donald J Trump.....
Dec 20, 2016 03:14:58 #
Dr.Dross wrote:
There is so much wrong with this piece it is diffi... (show quote)
As of now there is zero proof that the Russians hacked anything. Zero. Once more, if "all 17 US Intelligence agencies" are in agreement that "the Russians" hacked the DNC's emails, then where is their proof? Why did they refuse to brief Congress, after Congress demanded said briefing? Let's assume the worst, that the Russians DID hack the DNC. Had there been no wrongdoing on the part of the DNC, there would have been nothing to hack. No one has accused "the Russians" of planting false evidence, they are accused of exposing criminal corruption within the DNC. The next Liberal Hobbit Dancer who acknowledges that fact will be the first.
I seem to remember a certain James Comey, Director of the FBI, stating (while he was defending Hillary's cyberspace misadventures,) that the Russians' hacking technology is so sophisticated we probably wouldn't know it if they had hacked her emails.
Now that his gal has lost, (Make no mistake, Comey has benefited financially from the Clintoon political machine,) all of a sudden "the Russians" are not that sophisticated after all. Sure.
Dec 20, 2016 13:09:18 #
Loki,
The problem is the MSM never showed any of those emails, even ones when they were talking about having tea, so they have no idea what was in them. That is why they keep beating the drum of being hacked, the WH gives them the narrative of the day to deflect from the "leak" because then they would be trying to figure out who was the leak, even knowing the guy is dead, mysteriously murdered!
The problem is the MSM never showed any of those emails, even ones when they were talking about having tea, so they have no idea what was in them. That is why they keep beating the drum of being hacked, the WH gives them the narrative of the day to deflect from the "leak" because then they would be trying to figure out who was the leak, even knowing the guy is dead, mysteriously murdered!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.