One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
3% increase in Social Security
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Dec 5, 2016 18:34:42   #
badbobby Loc: texas
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Yep, nanobot rejuvenation. Just around the horizon. Can you imagine a world full of nothing but uber rich people? Who the hell would they prey on then?



what will they do for bodies?
isn't it just their heads that are froze?

Reply
Dec 5, 2016 18:37:49   #
vernon
 



Who are you trying to kid trump has said many he will not cut ss or medicare.why dont you find out the truth before you open your mouth.

Reply
Dec 5, 2016 18:40:16   #
vernon
 



You lie.

Reply
 
 
Dec 5, 2016 23:03:52   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
badbobby wrote:
great news Seniors
for those who are existing on Social Security
for the most of you your 3% increase for 2017 wont cover the increases in your Social Security and other insurance that covers the 20% that Social Security does not pay.
then when you add in the insurance that covers your drugs,it's even more of a blow.

It's getting harder and harder to be old


Becoming old is no problem at all. Being old is the problem.

Reply
Dec 5, 2016 23:13:32   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Pennylynn wrote:
When I first saw the release from SS Admin, I too thought it read 3 percent... which as you noted, would not pay for an extra loaf of bread .... but a .3 percent is an insult to seniors.



We are fortunate Congress didn't take the .3% also. I guess it is only because they didn't think of it in time.

Reply
Dec 5, 2016 23:16:54   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Nothing more could or should be said, your observation is spot on!
PoppaGringo wrote:
Becoming old is no problem at all. Being old is the problem.



Reply
Dec 6, 2016 05:28:27   #
Bun723
 
Unbelievable, put congress voted themselves a raise this year with their approval rate at 23%. Try that in the real world!!
Term limitation needs to be set in motion!
Merry Christmas to all🇺🇸🙏🏻

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2016 06:33:50   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
And obama demanded and received an 18 percent increase in retirement pay for presidents leaving office.. Former President Act.... So while he gets a thousands in his retirement pay... you will get by somehow on less than nothing....


.
Bun723 wrote:
Unbelievable, put congress voted themselves a raise this year with their approval rate at 23%. Try that in the real world!!
Term limitation needs to be set in motion!
Merry Christmas to all🇺🇸🙏🏻

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 07:28:01   #
danang Loc: Florida
 
I believe you have it wrong, it is 0.3 % for 2017!

badbobby wrote:
great news Seniors
for those who are existing on Social Security
for the most of you your 3% increase for 2017 wont cover the increases in your Social Security and other insurance that covers the 20% that Social Security does not pay.
then when you add in the insurance that covers your drugs,it's even more of a blow.

It's getting harder and harder to be old



Reply
Dec 6, 2016 07:30:17   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
SS Trustee Report: Status of the Social Security and Medicare Programs

Privatization of Social Security and Medicare will save the system, make it much more affordable, provide better benefits, put them into the hands of the American people, and eliminate government control.


Ask the people of Chile how their privatization of their retirement system has worked for them, Blade.

In the fall of 2000, a theater in Santiago’s Bellavista district featured the play Con Flores Amarillas, the story of a computer hacker who breaks into the accounts of Chile’s big banks to send checks to the poor, to Mapuche Indians—and to retirees. The inclusion of retirees among those aided by this fictional, high-tech Robin Hood reflects a growing awareness among Chileans that the privatized social security system bequeathed to them by General Augusto Pinochet may not be all it was cracked up to be. The tale may hold lessons for the United States as well as the rest of Latin America.

But from the perspective of many Chileans, the system has shown itself to be more problematic: Many working people are never able to pay in enough to qualify for the minimum retirement income. Many others risk seeing their retirement funds decimated by stock market downturns. The few private companies that make up the system are able to wield oligopoly power; they charge hefty fees and make large profits. And the new system has not, in fact, reduced the burden on the public treasury, which continues to pay out large sums for retirement benefits.

http://nacla.org/article/retiring-free-market-chiles-privatized-social-security

The solution to the funding crisis of SS would be fairly simple if politics weren't standing in the way. Growing income inequality is one reason the problem has gotten worse faster. While wages for most Americans have stagnated over the past three decades, earnings for the top 2 percent have increased dramatically (95% of income gains during obammy's rule has gone to the wealthy 1%). That means an increasing percentage of earnings fall outside the wage cap for payroll taxes. Simple solution - eliminating the wage cap altogether would close 75 percent of the long-term funding gap.

Then raise the payroll tax from 6.2% to 7.2% over a 20 year period. This would mean about .50 cents per week for an employee making $50,000/year.

Then pass a law (ha ha) that would make it illegal for politicians to continue to steal...er...loot...er...raid, whatever, the excess (when there is one again) SS funds to offset their overspending.

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 07:52:38   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
The missing decimal point was already mentioned on page 1.....

Does anyone read threads before they make observations? Lately, I see a lot of this along with duplicate threads....
danang wrote:
I believe you have it wrong, it is 0.3 % for 2017!

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2016 08:06:33   #
roy
 
Obama never asked for raise for his retirement,thats just more bs,like his mother inlaw getting a 160.000 dollar pension.

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 08:14:52   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
roy wrote:
Obama never asked for raise for his retirement,thats just more bs,like his mother inlaw getting a 160.000 dollar pension.


Yeah, roy, that's like Congress getting its automatic pay raise EVERY year UNLESS they vote NOT to take it. LOL That way they can lie to you idiot moonbats and say they did not vote themselves a pay raise.

Reply
Dec 6, 2016 08:20:42   #
danang Loc: Florida
 
Sorry, it was already mentioned on P1! Just keeping you guys sharp!



Reply
Dec 6, 2016 08:33:36   #
ldsuttonjr Loc: ShangriLa
 
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
Glade slipper fails again!

Privatization of SS is a ponzi scheme to enrich the 1% of the wealthiest and Trump!

http://www.ncpssm.org/PublicPolicy/SocialSecurity/Documents/ArticleID/14/The-Truth-About-Social-Security-and-Privatization


woffie: Who let you out of your troll hole?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.