One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The anus monologues
Page <<first <prev 3 of 18 next> last>>
Jan 1, 2014 22:52:49   #
Brian Devon
 
oldroy wrote:
Hey, Brian, I used to drink with Rock Hudson and some of the rest of the cast in a movie they were making in northeastern Italy. He was a great drinking companion but back then, 1957 he was still living in the closet.


I know. I only saw him once in person. He was filming an episode of MacMillan and Wife on the streets. He was very polite to gathering fans and signed autographs graciously. He had no Hollywood "attitude". Certainly was not effeminate in any way. I was sorry to hear about what happened to him.

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 22:57:32   #
Brian Devon
 
oldroy wrote:
I am pretty sure that you never read Coulter unless you get yourself up for the coming attack. I agree that it is your progressivism that causes you dislike her so much.


If you are trying to accuse me of being progressive, I plead guilty as charged. Feel better?

Reply
Jan 1, 2014 23:44:54   #
Ve'hoe
 
This coming from the leftwing side of the road who has savaged Sarah Palin, and this week the Romney's and their black grandchild,,,,,, you cannot say what you said about anger issues and ad hominem attacks, AND support the progressive left. How do you square those things and deny your own hypocrisy? Seems a dichotomy in your thinking and perception to me.
That was calm and direct,,,, I would appreciate an answer, otherwise, it would appear you are merely a partisan person who agrees, with only what agrees with them and their preconceived notions.

[quote=Brian Devon]
oldroy wrote:
More about Phil Robertson and A&E and GLAAD. I think that there is much more sense in this piece than in anything I have seen or heard about the situation that gays tried so hard to create. Maybe some Phil haters here can read and interpret the suggested Bible quotes and prove that they either aren't there or don't mean what the lady says they do.

I read the Ann Coulter link. Ann has....issues. She is a very angry woman prone to ad hominem attacks, i.e.calling those with whom she disagrees "pea-brains". Does she think she is still in elementary school? She also happens to be an anti-semite, with fantasies of living in a Christian theocracy. Now I remember why I usually avoid her. I avoid Phil Robertson for different reasons. Reality shows by nature are cheesy and depend on a gullible audience who can overlook that they are scripted or at the very least, heavily outlined. Phil can say what ever he wants about gay sex. As long as he is not violent nor instigates others to violence he is well within his rights. I certainly don't hate the man. I don't know him.
More about Phil Robertson and A&E and GLAAD. ... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 1, 2014 23:52:23   #
Brian Devon
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
This coming from the leftwing side of the road who has savaged Sarah Palin, and this week the Romney's and their black grandchild,,,,,, you cannot say what you said about anger issues and ad hominem attacks, AND support the progressive left. How do you square those things and deny your own hypocrisy? Seems a dichotomy in your thinking and perception to me.
That was calm and direct,,,, I would appreciate an answer, otherwise, it would appear you are merely a partisan person who agrees, with only what agrees with them and their preconceived notions.
This coming from the leftwing side of the road who... (show quote)


I did not savage Gov. Palin, nor Gov. Romney. I don't agree with their positions but I certainly harbor no ill will toward them. I truly believe people can disagree without being disagreeable. I think you have me confused with someone else. BTW, I think politicians families should be off limits for any attacks. For the most part they are usually innocent bystanders.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 00:03:38   #
Ve'hoe
 
That is not what I said, and you know it! That limp wristed dodge is beneath you from what I have seen of you so far. Don't do that. Stay with the conversation, and just tell the truth.

It is the tactics of the progressives,,, like terror is the instrument of the islamist,,, do you disagree with it? If so how, and what do you do personally to police your side?

I was at a teaparty rally, and actually helped remove someone with a swasticka....

If you are to be a "Civil" person, then you need to stand against things like that.

I have also been to an Ann Coulter speaking engagement and watched as liberal progressives screamed and shouted at her, and threatened both her and the rest of us... but of course the police stood around "them" when we actually retired to the street to see if they wanted to back up their claims.

Progressives play very dirty, I would not associate with people who act like that, or allow them to represent me.

Ann Coulter has only one problem, she stands up and has a backbone against progressive liberalism... if you don't condemn it what makes you any different than the bullies attacking her, palin, romneys etc etc etc>

Brian Devon wrote:
I did not savage Gov. Palin, nor Gov. Romney. I don't agree with their positions but I certainly harbor no ill will toward them. I truly believe people can disagree without being disagreeable. I think you have me confused with someone else. BTW, I think politicians families should be off limits for any attacks. For the most part they are usually innocent bystanders.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 00:16:53   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Brian Devon wrote:
If you are trying to accuse me of being progressive, I plead guilty as charged. Feel better?


I wasn't accusing, I was stating my opinion.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 00:58:23   #
Kirby
 
Oh, yez. I've known a few people who were truly "wonderful" next door neighbors "wonderful" to chat with. However, "wonderful" proved to be irrelevant as one turned out to be a child molester and a couple others drug dealers. As a matter of fact, this story gets repeated quite often in the news media - "wonderful" chit-chatters and neighborhood gladhanders who donate to "worthy" causes.
So, how does one decide who is truly a "good ol' boy"?
My point is that you can find any criminal class out there that can be found to have been a public persona of high standing, so because you have few homos who make nice conversation, donate a little pocket change to a worthy cause, or help an old lady change a flat tire doesn't mean squat. Anyone can put on a good face.
Justifying homosexuality in the name of "love" is producing all kinds of wonderful results. I predicted a long time ago that this lame justification for homos would pave the way for much worse and so it has as the various factions of bestiality and child sex promoters have gained a lot of ground from it. Congratulations! You opened the door to a Pandora's box. Slime and evil will never stay boxed up once given any kind of a green light or foot in the door.

Reply
Check out topic: The Origins of War
Jan 2, 2014 01:53:00   #
Brian Devon
 
OldSchool wrote:
Yep, two roosters don't make a chicken!


You are so right. Your family must be so proud of your unique insights into biology!

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 05:28:20   #
Ve'hoe
 
You know Brian, you sure take some snotty positions with people when intellectually you don't have the guts to really face questions about how and what you believe, and which peoples rights you will or wont stand up for.
It is really intellectually dishonest of you, or you lack moral courage to stand up for ALL peoples rights because of what you know YOUR side of the political aisle will do to you.

That is what I find so objectionable about the progressive fringe mentality,, it is more Nazi-istic than live and let live. And yes I have asked you, in a nice way, repeatedly whether it is live and let live or only that if you agree with me,,,,that is progressivism.

Brian Devon wrote:
You are so right. Your family must be so proud of your unique insights into biology!

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 06:45:50   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
Brian Devon wrote:
I know a few gay people. They seem to be caring and loving. Gay people have been with us, since before their was even written history...before there was language...before people walked fully upright. They don't need to proselytize any more than heterosexual people do. For both heterosexuals and homosexuals their desires are innate. Many mammals also engage in gay behavior. I suspect proselytizing doesn't enter into the equation.


"Proselytizing" is exactly the problem! Gays weren't satisfied with "Don't ask, don't tell", and they weren't satisfied with allowing people to vocalize their opinion of the lifestyle. They weren't satisfied with the "I don't care what they do as long as they leave me alone" attitude. They are trying to "force" everyone to accept and agree with their opinions. That's never going to happen and as the article opines, "they have gone from being bullied to being the bullies". It's only the PC attitude that has allowed them to get as far as they have forcing laws to be made in their favor and against the majority.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 07:41:08   #
clarkwv Loc: west virginia
 
OldSchool wrote:
Good! You socialize with them, personally I don't care to. I liked it better when they stayed in the closet, and didn't rub it in my nose.


Just wait till you find you have one in you extended family.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 07:55:32   #
Brian Devon
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
You know Brian, you sure take some snotty positions with people when intellectually you don't have the guts to really face questions about how and what you believe, and which peoples rights you will or wont stand up for.
It is really intellectually dishonest of you, or you lack moral courage to stand up for ALL peoples rights because of what you know YOUR side of the political aisle will do to you.

That is what I find so objectionable about the progressive fringe mentality,, it is more Nazi-istic than live and let live. And yes I have asked you, in a nice way, repeatedly whether it is live and let live or only that if you agree with me,,,,that is progressivism.
You know Brian, you sure take some snotty position... (show quote)


Its not possible to stand up for all peoples rights. I will not stand up for religious bigots to have the right to crush minorities with whom they are uncomfortable. I will not defend the rights of Westboro Baptist Church, as well as Louis Farrakahn, to have the right to advocate the execution of gay people.The Supreme Court in numerous rulings has made it clear that the majority is NOT entitled to eclipse the rights of a minority, just because they are uncomfortable with them. If you and your kinsmen want to live by the laws of leviticus that is your business. If you want to impose those laws on others. That is something else. I vociferously defend my right to enjoy shrimp and crab when I am out dining, as well as drive a car on Shabbat (Hebrew for Sabbath). Civil rights are protected by the constitution under the 14th amendment. That is why the court threw out anti-miscegenation laws and sodomy laws, as well as throwing out "separate but equal" racial segregation.

18 states and D.C. have now legalized gay marriage. The "dominos" fall monthly. You need not feel so threatened (which brings up a whole other can of worms). If you don't like the idea of gay marriage, don't have one. No one is making you engage in gay behavior. Grow up! If you really are determined to live by the laws of Leviticus, I suggest you become an orthodox Jew, move to Israel, and live among the Mea Shearim in Jerusalem. Then you can spout off all you like about those that engage in behaviors not sanctioned by the holy books.

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 08:12:27   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
I've been called a libtard but I am no Queer. I believe in live and let live however and as long as queers stay out of my face they can go at each other all they want. My brother in-law disowned his son several years back when he found out he was gay. Now he wishes he hadn't go figure.
oldroy wrote:
More about Phil Robertson and A&E and GLAAD. I think that there is much more sense in this piece than in anything I have seen or heard about the situation that gays tried so hard to create. Maybe some Phil haters here can read and interpret the suggested Bible quotes and prove that they either aren't there or don't mean what the lady says they do.

http://townhall.com/columnists/anncoulter/2013/12/31/the-anus-monologues-n1770466?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
More about Phil Robertson and A&E and GLAAD. ... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 09:31:09   #
taijean
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
I know some too: However, that doesn't negate the facts:

"a recent study in the American Journal of Public Health has shown that 39% of males with same-sex attraction have been abused by other males with same-sex attraction."

The Spitzer report from the Archives of Sexual Behavior, which will publish in October, surveyed ex-homosexuals who were out of the lifestyle for five years, and it found that 64% of the men and 43% of the women considered themselves to be heterosexuals after they received treatment. Dr. Spitzer of Columbia University led the task force of the American Psychiatric Association in 1973 that removed homosexuality from our diagnostic manual.

'In a number of studies, when people with same-sex attraction were treated, a third of the patients get better, a third get mixed results, and a third don't get better. In my clinical experience, when a spiritual component is brought in to the treatment, the recovery rate is much higher.' Dr. Rick Fitzgibbons and Dr John riggs MD
I know some too: However, that doesn't negate the ... (show quote)


I TRULY LOVED YOUR REFERENCE TO THE SPIRITUAL COMPONENT BEING BROUGHT INTO THE TREATMENT PROGRAM... THANK YOU FOR THAT OBSERVATION...

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 10:07:21   #
rickdri
 
Ve'hoe wrote:
Don't forget the "disease" portion of the male homosexual act,,,

From a Study by Dr John Riggs "Furthermore, ejaculate has components that are immunosuppressive. In the course of ordinary reproductive physiology, this allows the sperm to evade the immune defenses of the female. Rectal insemination of rabbits has shown that sperm impaired the immune defenses of the recipient.5 Semen may have a similar impact on humans.6

The end result is that the fragility of the anus and rectum, along with the immunosuppressive effect of ejaculate, make anal-genital intercourse a most efficient manner of transmitting HIV and other infections. The list of diseases found with extraordinary frequency among male homosexual practitioners as a result of anal intercourse is alarming:

Anal Cancer
Chlamydia trachomatis
Cryptosporidium
Giardia lamblia
Herpes simplex virus
Human immunodeficiency virus
Human papilloma virus
Isospora belli
Microsporidia
Gonorrhea
Viral hepatitis types B & C
Syphilis7"

So yeah,,, there is that, I guess if you want that in the environment, you have to admit that gays don't care about the rest of us,,, or do they??
Don't forget the "disease" portion of th... (show quote)


Thanks for this valuable information. I have some friends and relatives who are gay. I think I should show them your comment, hope they don't get too mad at me.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 18 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.