If middle eastern countries don't respect Obama ....how's that going to work with a female president? Don't women (legally) have half the value of men in Sharia law?
They will use her to get what they want
steve66613 wrote:
If middle eastern countries don't respect Obama ....how's that going to work with a female president? Don't women (legally) have half the value of men in Sharia law?
jimahrens wrote:
They will use her to get what they want
You're not going to get what you want from her, so what makes you think 'they' will? Unless you are saying that men from the Middle East are stronger than American men.
working class stiff wrote:
You're not going to get what you want from her, so what makes you think 'they' will? Unless you are saying that men from the Middle East are stronger than American men.
Men from the middle east behave according to a different set of laws that allows them to own women.
Docadhoc wrote:
Men from the middle east behave according to a different set of laws that allows them to own women.
And they have already bought her with money through her Tax free foundation.
working class stiff wrote:
You're not going to get what you want from her, so what makes you think 'they' will? Unless you are saying that men from the Middle East are stronger than American men.
I don't know what she'll do if she wins she's beholding to everybody!
Start a war kill off her enemies or let them kill each other!
Docadhoc wrote:
Men from the middle east behave according to a different set of laws that allows them to own women.
That may be true....but they cannot own American women. There is no reason to suspect that just because Mrs. Clinton is female that she is somehow weaker than a man. As one male is finding out this campaign.
Docadhoc wrote:
Men from the middle east behave according to a different set of laws that allows them to own women.
Or keep/sell them as slaves, marry them as children, required to rape them if not Muslim, kill them if they're a daughter who pisses 'em off, chop their head off or stone them to death if deemed unfaithful, cane or stone them to death if they're deemed not religious enough.......and more!
So, since Hillary has has done nothing but heap death and destruction on middle easterners, how can she smoothe talk 'em into being our buddies? Do they see her as something other than a woman? Really?
working class stiff wrote:
That may be true....but they cannot own American women. There is no reason to suspect that just because Mrs. Clinton is female that she is somehow weaker than a man. As one male is finding out this campaign.
What is your opinion of the latest WikiLeaks findings, have you been keeping up with that, very revealing.
I'm not a fan of the WikiLeaks phenomena. They remind me of rorschach tests in that people see what they want to see.
When they leaked the Iraq memos, conservatives were outraged and wanted the leakers' heads and liberals were all for the leaks.
Now that the shoe is on the other foot and the leaks are about Mrs. Clinton, both sides have changed their position.
Strangely enough, my news sources are, by amount of time spent, OPP and the Daily Show with Trevor Noah. I then usually spend some time on the net to check out what other sources are saying about the issues that interest me. I'm not surprised that Mrs. Clinton isn't an angel. She's a politician, after all, one with a very long public record.
Even in this thread the ambiguity about what we want to see comes out: here folks wonder about whether she might be weak, whereas on another thread folks were wondering about whether she's too willing to start a war with Russia. We see what we want to see....
working class stiff wrote:
That may be true....but they cannot own American women. There is no reason to suspect that just because Mrs. Clinton is female that she is somehow weaker than a man. As one male is finding out this campaign.
There's no doubt about the status of women; here and in most of the world, but, our current enemy may have entirely different opinions and beliefs. Thus, is HRC the best choice at this point in history? (Even though she's the (vastly) most corrupt individual ever to run for office!)
working class stiff wrote:
I'm not a fan of the WikiLeaks phenomena. They remind me of rorschach tests in that people see what they want to see.
When they leaked the Iraq memos, conservatives were outraged and wanted the leakers' heads and liberals were all for the leaks.
Now that the shoe is on the other foot and the leaks are about Mrs. Clinton, both sides have changed their position.
Strangely enough, my news sources are, by amount of time spent, OPP and the Daily Show with Trevor Noah. I then usually spend some time on the net to check out what other sources are saying about the issues that interest me. I'm not surprised that Mrs. Clinton isn't an angel. She's a politician, after all, one with a very long public record.
Even in this thread the ambiguity about what we want to see comes out: here folks wonder about whether she might be weak, whereas on another thread folks were wondering about whether she's too willing to start a war with Russia. We see what we want to see....
I'm not a fan of the WikiLeaks phenomena. They re... (
show quote)
Have you listened to any of the hearings, Bengazi and Email?
If she is not honorable enough to play fair with her own people,
do you really think she'll have our back in mind?
This just kills me. Why arguing is still going on about the emails is beyond me.
Hardly anyone is disputing their validity or the Clinton Gang obviously setting up
her servers to circumvent our State Department . Why would it matter who the
source of truth is . I.E. Wikileaks. In typical fashion of low morals from the left
they want to kill the messenger . Sorry it's not just the left. Our uniparty Congress
is crapping themselves because they may be next.
Or
This string where one poster doesn't possess the basic knowledge of the
vast cultural difference between us and the middle eastern man. Yet ,
he's got an opinion . Amazing .
bilordinary wrote:
Have you listened to any of the hearings, Bengazi and Email?
If she is not honorable enough to play fair with her own people,
do you really think she'll have our back in mind?
valkyrierider wrote:
And they have already bought her with money through her Tax free foundation.
And by comparison to.middle eastern men, American men try to respect women. ...although it.is nearly impossible to respect Hillary.
It is an interesting point though that Hillary has a history of sticking her nose into middle eastern countries and their politics.
If she were elected I wonder what she would do if she tried to tell one of their rulers how it is and she is told to shut up, go make lunch, wash the car, then.keep out of sight until further notice?
working class stiff wrote:
That may be true....but they cannot own American women. There is no reason to suspect that just because Mrs. Clinton is female that she is somehow weaker than a man. As one male is finding out this campaign.
You don't get it. It's not about Hillary being strong or weak.
It's about middle eastern men
..as in heads of state....see women as inferior objects. They won women. They do not discuss with them.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.