lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

With probably a little more difficulty, I mean she can barely stand without risk of falling over and yet healthy and fit to be president?? Have you done your vetting on her VP choice?? Birds of a feather, do flock together you know...

Loki Loc: Georgia

How many Trump supporters have been assaulted at Trump rallies? A hell of a lot more than one punch in the mouth. Don't start that crap. No wonder Liberals want gun control. They think everyone indulges in juvenile outburst of violence like they do. They can't control themselves, so they think everyone and everything should be controlled.

mouset783 Loc: Oklahoma

Are you suggesting this the first of his stupidity you have read? Just like O'stupid and the rest of ignorant lefties on this opp every time he posts he sticks both feet in..

Ike Loc: Minnesota Iron Range

So just how are they going to "fight" the Supreme Court? Do you think he is talking about them arguing their case before the Court? And if that's what he's talking about, why immediately after saying "maybe the Second Amendment people can do something, I don't know," did he say, "But that would be a horrible day"? If they won their case in court, wouldn't that be a wonderful day?

Ike Loc: Minnesota Iron Range

I think he made it clear what he meant when he said, "But that would be a horrible day." Why would it be horrible? I think he meant it would be horrible if a sitting president or a Supreme Court justice was assassinated.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Trump didn't say anything about violence. Get a grip. He's just running off at the mouth like he always does. I'm a huge second Ammendmant person. So what? If the court or Hillary try's to take guns from law abiding citizens I believe there will be blood in the streets.

robmull Loc: florida

The number A-1 message for the loony "left," recon, is "VIOLENCE." ANY words that Mr. Trump says concerning the NRA or the 2nd Amendment has them orgasming in grandma's basement trying all different ways to figure-out how to "spin" the context and meaning in order to shift the focus from Hillary's totally reprehensible being to Mr. Trump's more conservative ideology. Currently THAT'S even more important than setting specific awkward days for the all-important presidential debates. Just as Hillary made sure that her primary debates with "The Bern" were on Saturday nights [when most people are away from the TV's], and now with "THE DONALD," a perfect way to suppress and drastically limit the listening audience is to go with the NFL nights. That sounds REALLY promising. Perhaps getting John Podesta and Chris Matthews or Rachael Madsow to be the "loony" judges may be the next important secular liberal progressive strategy; and certainly another arrow in the progressive quiver to sling at "THE DONALD"!!! ANYTHING to make Mr. Trump HAVE to cancel the intended [one-sided] "roast!!!" Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TRUMP!!!

Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts

I agree. Her health is in serious question.

I have not, but, I suspected just as you say, birds of a feather... I didn't think it would be necessary. I don't think she's going to win.

Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts

He was saying it would be a horrible day, if Hillary was elected, and given the chance to stack the court. And I agree with him.....

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

Sal, The founding fathers said a lot of things that have been become either impossible or wrong. Jefferson saw the future of this country as a society of farmers. There was no history yet and the founding fathers had no idea which way the country would go, or if the new government was even doable. What protects our democratic republic is an informed and educated citizenry, not guns!
Having said that, I have no problems with citizens owning firearms if they are not crazy or a felon. I also do not believe that there should be military semi- automatic or automatic rapid fire guns allowed for general use.
The founding fathers could not know about modern firearms. All they knew about were single shot muskets, a far cry from what we have today.
Justice Scalia believed that the Constitution was dead, meaning shouldn't be reinterpreted from what they believed at the time of its writing. I believe that the constitution is a living document that should be reinterpreted by every generation to meet the needs of the people.The United States was not a true democracy in todays meaning. Only white men of property had the vote. The new states that came into the union as people moved west became more and more democratic as did the original thirteen states. Today all natural born citizens have the right to vote, This is something that the founding fathers could never have imagined. In short, the US Constitution can be interpreted by a new bunch of Supreme Court Justices. At the time of Washington, the job of interpreting the Constitution wasn't settled. Jefferson believed that the individual states should interpret the constitution.
My point is that times change, and the nation needs to change with it!

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

J, I am a liberal Democrat and I own a gun. Hillary never said that she would try to do away with the second amendment. It's a part of the Republican scare tactic. I would protect any part of the Constitution, including the second amendment if any person tried to do away with it without due process! The Constitution provides two ways to amend the Constitution, and they are nearly impossible to carry out without a very large majority of the people in favor of a proposed change, so don't worry, be happy!

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

The statement that I received is that gun owners should not vote for the Wicked Witch of the East. The liberals try to be cute by putting their words into what ever is said by a conservative or Republican.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Perhaps you can tell me the difference between a "military semi-automatic" and and "automatic rapid fire gun" and a "non-military semi-automatic." As a veteran who qualified expert with both rifle and pistol, I am most curious. All these years and hundreds of thousands of rounds and now this astounding snippet of news.
Your statement about automatic weapons shows how little you do know. It is extremely difficult to own a selective fire weapon. It has been illegal to manufacture them for civilian use for more than 30 years. It requires an expensive annual license. I have not heard of a single crime being committed with a legal selective fire weapon in the past several years. There have been a couple of instances where these weapons have been either smuggled into the country or stolen from the US military, but that is not what we are talking about.

Concerning "military semi-automatic," you must mean handguns, since the military doesn't use semi-auto rifles except in very specialized circumstances. Newsflash: There is no difference between a "military" and a "non-military" semi-auto. While mass murderers have used semi-auto rifles, I have another news flash for you. Anyone with a modicum of training can take a semi-auto with a number of 5 round magazines and put out nearly as many rounds nearly as quickly as with a 30 rounder.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Hillary has said publicly that she thinks the Heller decision confirming an individual right to own firearms is wrong. She has stated she would like to see the Court "revisit" the Heller decision, (presumably with a couple of tame Liberals appointed by her to tilt the balance. ) Hillary has said she would support a ban/confiscation similar to the one in Australia; (which, by the way, has proven to be a failure. ) Obama's attempts to use the BATFE as a terror organization, and to unilaterally ban certain kinds of ammo as "non-sporting," even though it is used by sportsmen every day, is an example of rule by executive fiat.
Obama's efforts to make ammo purchases more expensive are another example. There are all sorts of extra-legal mechanisms you can use when you have idiots like Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the Supreme Court, and unhung scoundrels like Loretta Lynch as Attorney General.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Oh boy! The old "living document" mantra. Good grief! It is amazing we made it this far with this kind of ignorance constantly being foisted on us.

The principles set down in our constitution and the wisdom embodied in it are timeless. They are not based on the whims of the times, but on eternal truths addressing the nature of man. To think our constitution is malleable and should be "interpreted" based on an ideological abstract or a political agenda is not only immoral and dishonest, but is damn near treasonous.

The Constitution’s timeless wisdom