Khizr Khan has no shame

By J. Marsolo

There is no comparison between Khizr Khan and Mrs. Pat Smith. Mrs. Smith has consistently spoken out that Hillary lied to her by blaming the Benghazi attack on a video when Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack. Further, Hillary told her they would "get" the video maker. Thus, Mrs. Smith has a justifiable complaint that Hillary lied about the cause and failed to provide the requested security prior to the attack, and the failure to do anything to help the Americans at Benghazi. There is a clear connection between Sean Smith's death and Hillary's conduct.

Mr. Khan's son was killed in 2004. There is absolutely no connection between his death and Donald Trump. Trump did not lie to Khan about how his son was killed or who was responsible. It appears that Khan was recruited to the Democratic convention simply to attack Trump's immigration policy of proposing to suspend immigration from Muslim countries during the current war on terror.

It is Mr. Khan who should be ashamed for using his son's death to make a political statement about immigration. It does not even make sense. Khan said that if Trump's policy of suspending immigration was in effect prior to 2004, then his family could not have immigrated, and his son would not have been able to serve the USA. But his son would be alive. What is more important: that his son would be alive, or that he can use his son's death to make a political statement?

Khan is pushing a political agenda to oppose the suspension of immigration from Muslim countries and supports the election of Hillary. And worse, he chose to use his son's death in 2004 to make a political statement in 2016. No doubt Mr. and Mrs. Khan are sad and upset and mourn their son, but why are they using his death for their politics?

There is no comparison between Khizr Khan and Mrs. Pat Smith. Mrs. Smith has consistently spoken out that Hillary lied to her by blaming the Benghazi attack on a video when Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack. Further, Hillary told her they would "get" the video maker. Thus, Mrs. Smith has a justifiable complaint that Hillary lied about the cause and failed to provide the requested security prior to the attack, and the failure to do anything to help the Americans at Benghazi. There is a clear connection between Sean Smith's death and Hillary's conduct.

Mr. Khan's son was killed in 2004. There is absolutely no connection between his death and Donald Trump. Trump did not lie to Khan about how his son was killed or who was responsible. It appears that Khan was recruited to the Democratic convention simply to attack Trump's immigration policy of proposing to suspend immigration from Muslim countries during the current war on terror.

It is Mr. Khan who should be ashamed for using his son's death to make a political statement about immigration. It does not even make sense. Khan said that if Trump's policy of suspending immigration was in effect prior to 2004, then his family could not have immigrated, and his son would not have been able to serve the USA. But his son would be alive. What is more important: that his son would be alive, or that he can use his son's death to make a political statement?

Khan is pushing a political agenda to oppose the suspension of immigration from Muslim countries and supports the election of Hillary. And worse, he chose to use his son's death in 2004 to make a political statement in 2016. No doubt Mr. and Mrs. Khan are sad and upset and mourn their son, but why are they using his death for their politics?

Khizr Khan has no shame

By J. Marsolo

There is no comparison between Khizr Khan and Mrs. Pat Smith. Mrs. Smith has consistently spoken out that Hillary lied to her by blaming the Benghazi attack on a video when Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack. Further, Hillary told her they would "get" the video maker. Thus, Mrs. Smith has a justifiable complaint that Hillary lied about the cause and failed to provide the requested security prior to the attack, and the failure to do anything to help the Americans at Benghazi. There is a clear connection between Sean Smith's death and Hillary's conduct.

Mr. Khan's son was killed in 2004. There is absolutely no connection between his death and Donald Trump. Trump did not lie to Khan about how his son was killed or who was responsible. It appears that Khan was recruited to the Democratic convention simply to attack Trump's immigration policy of proposing to suspend immigration from Muslim countries during the current war on terror.

It is Mr. Khan who should be ashamed for using his son's death to make a political statement about immigration. It does not even make sense. Khan said that if Trump's policy of suspending immigration was in effect prior to 2004, then his family could not have immigrated, and his son would not have been able to serve the USA. But his son would be alive. What is more important: that his son would be alive, or that he can use his son's death to make a political statement?

Khan is pushing a political agenda to oppose the suspension of immigration from Muslim countries and supports the election of Hillary. And worse, he chose to use his son's death in 2004 to make a political statement in 2016. No doubt Mr. and Mrs. Khan are sad and upset and mourn their son, but why are they using his death for their politics?

There is no comparison between Khizr Khan and Mrs. Pat Smith. Mrs. Smith has consistently spoken out that Hillary lied to her by blaming the Benghazi attack on a video when Hillary knew it was a terrorist attack. Further, Hillary told her they would "get" the video maker. Thus, Mrs. Smith has a justifiable complaint that Hillary lied about the cause and failed to provide the requested security prior to the attack, and the failure to do anything to help the Americans at Benghazi. There is a clear connection between Sean Smith's death and Hillary's conduct.

Mr. Khan's son was killed in 2004. There is absolutely no connection between his death and Donald Trump. Trump did not lie to Khan about how his son was killed or who was responsible. It appears that Khan was recruited to the Democratic convention simply to attack Trump's immigration policy of proposing to suspend immigration from Muslim countries during the current war on terror.

It is Mr. Khan who should be ashamed for using his son's death to make a political statement about immigration. It does not even make sense. Khan said that if Trump's policy of suspending immigration was in effect prior to 2004, then his family could not have immigrated, and his son would not have been able to serve the USA. But his son would be alive. What is more important: that his son would be alive, or that he can use his son's death to make a political statement?

Khan is pushing a political agenda to oppose the suspension of immigration from Muslim countries and supports the election of Hillary. And worse, he chose to use his son's death in 2004 to make a political statement in 2016. No doubt Mr. and Mrs. Khan are sad and upset and mourn their son, but why are they using his death for their politics?

====================
That's what happens to Muslims who put a little root under their feet. He came from Pakistan in 1980. Now, he behaves as if he owns the USA. It was reported that Khan's law office is facilitating all the illegal Muslims in the US to get permanent residency. As long as these Muslims multiply and become majority, wait and see, they will drive us away or slice our heads off. He practice Sharia Law, and hoping that one day, the more illegal Muslims he help them become permanent residence, there will be majority of the running this country. Sharia Law will govern. These democrats starting from Hillary Clinton is a friend of MB, and was reported that Khan is an MB. Khan acts like he sprouted here in the US when in fact he is a naturalized citizen. Arrived in 1980 to the US. He is an agent to multiplying the Muslim population to the US and Hillary and Obama like that so much.

We know for sure that ISIS is imbedding terrorists into the refugee population. These people need to be vetted before we let them in, to protect ourselves. There is nothing racist or islamaphobic about that. Was Mr. Khan worried his ties to groups back home would have kept him out of the US if he was investigated? If so, then he could have a problem with Trump.
His son gave the ultimate sacrifice for our country. The son was raised with values we Americans hold dear, raised by..., his parents. Maybe Khan (the dad) is confused. Maybe he was a young radical that grew up and found the truth. I do not pretend to know the man's motivation. I feel sorry for his loss. He should be proud of his son. He should mourn hi son's passing. He should examine his own conscience. He should support the values and ideals his son died for. He must be confused and bitter. That makes Hillary a perfect choice for him.