PeterS wrote:
As I said before--anecdotes and fallacies are not rational answers. If you want answers than you have to ask real questions. I've answered to the best of my ability what you've posed. I can't do any thing more than that...
You didn't even try as evidenced in your reply to my questions and answers to.yours.
You completely ducked my entire post and went back to your anec. te and fallacy commentary. I am trying to convince you of nothing. I am explaining my belief but you try to tell me about what I believe as if I asked. I did not. I said if we are to discuss, get your facts straight. I am not telling you that your belief is wrong. I am telling you that your facts are incorrect so if you want to deny, then deny the true facts, not distorted garbage.
I have been trying to find common ground on which to discuss Christianity and explain my belief and why, but you refuse to seriously discuss. Every time you are confronted with something you don't want to discuss, you go back to denial and start talking about "irrational".
There is nothing irrational about your belief or mine. I have nothing against you believing what you believe but you obviously object to me having my beliefs. You make comments about Christianity that are grossly incorrect and I tell you the truth and you deny it. You set yourself up as an expert regarding something you don't believe in and when I correct one of your incorrect statements, you go straight back to denial including your denial of dodging my posting to you, which you clearly did. You make comments based on completely incorrect information and I suspect you know it. Such as God controlling everything. Preposterous and you know it. It is insulting to see you attempt this charade.
You don't need to dodge or avoid anything. Just don't engage if you do not seriously intend to follow through.
In actuality you do not wish to engage. You want a platform from which to deny.
Your professed concept of God and Christianity is tremendously wrong as if all you know came from a "religiously oriented" philosophy class. If it did you should know that those classes teach only the instructor's opinion regardless of what you were told because if it was doctrine you could have bought the required books and the school would save the instructor's salary and associated costs.
And you won't like this either but if the school was Catholic, it was not main stream Christian. Don't tell me about the size of Catholicism. The Catholic church and mainstream Christianity are mile's apart and use differing Bibles so if that was your learning base, you have been fed a line about Christianity and are in fact a novice.
I find you disingenuous and locked in a mind set that prevents serious two way discussion regarding the Christianity you know nothing of. And I suspect you know better because what you say is so. egregious you have to be laughing as you type.
Say what you will, and you will because deniers must have the last word in absence of genuine interest as though it makes them points somehow. I'm done with you regarding this topic. And I see through your facade.