One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Oh no. Say it ain't so. The Wasserman creature is under attack .
Page 1 of 2 next>
May 29, 2016 11:34:51   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend at Bernie's gang is wanting to fry her bacon.

There is a move on within the Democratic Party to silence her. How dare they. Outing one of their own.
The poster child for breaking the glass ceiling. Idiot or not . Moron or not . Blathering buffoon or not.
She has been held on high as one of the parties mouth pieces for years. Her voice is important and continues
to enlighten us believers in the rights of all narrow minded fixated dolts to speak their minds on the public's
greatest stage , the U S Senate. Speaking of witch ( pun intended ) where has Pelosi been ?
You go girl. Go anywhere else and please hurry .


The story

The knives are out for Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And The Hill just served up a whole drawer full of them.

Without identifying who is wielding the weapons.

That’s how unnamed sources use the press to bloody their target.

There is no doubt that Wasserman Schultz has become a highly controversial chairman of the Democratic National Committee. She has pretty obviously tilted toward the establishment’s candidate, Hillary Clinton, and is now at war with Bernie Sanders and his supporters. I’m sure some Dems would love to dump her.

But does that mean someone should be allowed to say this, without his or her name attached?
2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics.
See Latest Coverage →

“‘There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on,’ said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.”

Kind of a nauseating image, by the way.

The same anonymous senator is quoted as saying, “How can she open the convention? Sanders supporters would go nuts.”

Then there’s a “senior Senate Democratic aide” who says, “There’s a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving.”

But it’s not fair to say the Hill piece has no on-the-record comments. A whole bunch of senators--Barbara Mikulski, Bill Nelson, Tim Kaine, Kirsten Gillibrand, Jeanne Shaneen—are quoted as backing Wasserman Schultz’s tenure. There are also statements of support from House Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer. But these are at the bottom of the piece, after this to-be-sure phrase: “The view that Wasserman Schultz should go in the name of party unity isn’t unanimous.”

Naturally, the Hill piece reverberated across the media landscape, including Fox News, adding to the sense that Wasserman Schultz is in serious jeopardy. The story eventually says she has no plans to step down and no decision will be made soon.

I doubt the Democrats would dump their chairman just before the Philadelphia convention. Wouldn’t that make Hillary look weak, like she had to mollify the Bernie faction to save the convention from disruption?

Sanders is going after the Florida congresswoman big time, even endorsing her primary opponent, Tim Canova, who has gotten a fundraising windfall. Wasserman Schultz insists she’s been neutral in the presidential contest, although by initially allowing just six debates—and burying them on Saturday nights and in holiday periods—she certainly seemed to be helping Clinton sit on her lead. More debates were added only when Hillary wanted the faceoffs as Sanders surged.

Now if Sanders somehow won the nomination, it would be routine for him to install his own person at the DNC. But Clinton has an insurmountable lead.

In the end, much of this is inside baseball. Whether Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains head of the party won’t affect 50 votes in November. But Bernie and his backers want her banished, and their weapon of choice, for now, is leaking to the press.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.

Reply
May 29, 2016 12:13:29   #
CowboyMilt
 
missinglink wrote:
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend at Bernie's gang is wanting to fry her bacon.

There is a move on within the Democratic Party to silence her. How dare they. Outing one of their own.
The poster child for breaking the glass ceiling. Idiot or not . Moron or not . Blathering buffoon or not.
She has been held on high as one of the parties mouth pieces for years. Her voice is important and continues
to enlighten us believers in the rights of all narrow minded fixated dolts to speak their minds on the public's
greatest stage , the U S Senate. Speaking of witch ( pun intended ) where has Pelosi been ?
You go girl. Go anywhere else and please hurry .


The story

The knives are out for Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And The Hill just served up a whole drawer full of them.

Without identifying who is wielding the weapons.

That’s how unnamed sources use the press to bloody their target.

There is no doubt that Wasserman Schultz has become a highly controversial chairman of the Democratic National Committee. She has pretty obviously tilted toward the establishment’s candidate, Hillary Clinton, and is now at war with Bernie Sanders and his supporters. I’m sure some Dems would love to dump her.

But does that mean someone should be allowed to say this, without his or her name attached?
2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics.
See Latest Coverage →

“‘There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on,’ said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.”

Kind of a nauseating image, by the way.

The same anonymous senator is quoted as saying, “How can she open the convention? Sanders supporters would go nuts.”

Then there’s a “senior Senate Democratic aide” who says, “There’s a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving.”

But it’s not fair to say the Hill piece has no on-the-record comments. A whole bunch of senators--Barbara Mikulski, Bill Nelson, Tim Kaine, Kirsten Gillibrand, Jeanne Shaneen—are quoted as backing Wasserman Schultz’s tenure. There are also statements of support from House Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer. But these are at the bottom of the piece, after this to-be-sure phrase: “The view that Wasserman Schultz should go in the name of party unity isn’t unanimous.”

Naturally, the Hill piece reverberated across the media landscape, including Fox News, adding to the sense that Wasserman Schultz is in serious jeopardy. The story eventually says she has no plans to step down and no decision will be made soon.

I doubt the Democrats would dump their chairman just before the Philadelphia convention. Wouldn’t that make Hillary look weak, like she had to mollify the Bernie faction to save the convention from disruption?

Sanders is going after the Florida congresswoman big time, even endorsing her primary opponent, Tim Canova, who has gotten a fundraising windfall. Wasserman Schultz insists she’s been neutral in the presidential contest, although by initially allowing just six debates—and burying them on Saturday nights and in holiday periods—she certainly seemed to be helping Clinton sit on her lead. More debates were added only when Hillary wanted the faceoffs as Sanders surged.

Now if Sanders somehow won the nomination, it would be routine for him to install his own person at the DNC. But Clinton has an insurmountable lead.

In the end, much of this is inside baseball. Whether Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains head of the party won’t affect 50 votes in November. But Bernie and his backers want her banished, and their weapon of choice, for now, is leaking to the press.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend ... (show quote)


Why don't we just shit can the whole DNC & put Trump in by Proclamation...then most of America would be very very happy!

Reply
May 29, 2016 12:14:02   #
RJohnson
 
Debbie Wasserman was quoted as saying on CNN's State of the Union (Orlando Sentinel 9/7/15) that "There's nothing more important to me, as a Jew, (than) to ensure that Israel's existence is there throughout our generations,".
That statement leads me to wondering if she considers herself as a hyphenated American (Jew-American) or even as an American at all? You would think that as a member of the United States congress, the existence of the United States would be the most importance to her. But, as the chairwoman of the democratic national committee, I suppose she reflects the policies of the Democratic Party. Clinton certainly seems follow these policies.

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2016 12:30:45   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
I've never understood how a member of Congress can also be her party's national committee chairman.

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:07:30   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
LAPhil wrote:
I've never understood how a member of Congress can also be her party's national committee chairman.


LAPhil-it seems as though such a position would require that she spend many hours at that job as opposed to tending to her congressional duties. Guess its all part of riding the gravy train. I hope a president Trump would propose term limits for both Congress and the SCOTUS. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:17:50   #
Babsan
 
missinglink wrote:
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend at Bernie's gang is wanting to fry her bacon.

There is a move on within the Democratic Party to silence her. How dare they. Outing one of their own.
The poster child for breaking the glass ceiling. Idiot or not . Moron or not . Blathering buffoon or not.
She has been held on high as one of the parties mouth pieces for years. Her voice is important and continues
to enlighten us believers in the rights of all narrow minded fixated dolts to speak their minds on the public's
greatest stage , the U S Senate. Speaking of witch ( pun intended ) where has Pelosi been ?
You go girl. Go anywhere else and please hurry .


The story

The knives are out for Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And The Hill just served up a whole drawer full of them.

Without identifying who is wielding the weapons.

That’s how unnamed sources use the press to bloody their target.

There is no doubt that Wasserman Schultz has become a highly controversial chairman of the Democratic National Committee. She has pretty obviously tilted toward the establishment’s candidate, Hillary Clinton, and is now at war with Bernie Sanders and his supporters. I’m sure some Dems would love to dump her.

But does that mean someone should be allowed to say this, without his or her name attached?
2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics.
See Latest Coverage →

“‘There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on,’ said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.”

Kind of a nauseating image, by the way.

The same anonymous senator is quoted as saying, “How can she open the convention? Sanders supporters would go nuts.”

Then there’s a “senior Senate Democratic aide” who says, “There’s a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving.”

But it’s not fair to say the Hill piece has no on-the-record comments. A whole bunch of senators--Barbara Mikulski, Bill Nelson, Tim Kaine, Kirsten Gillibrand, Jeanne Shaneen—are quoted as backing Wasserman Schultz’s tenure. There are also statements of support from House Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer. But these are at the bottom of the piece, after this to-be-sure phrase: “The view that Wasserman Schultz should go in the name of party unity isn’t unanimous.”

Naturally, the Hill piece reverberated across the media landscape, including Fox News, adding to the sense that Wasserman Schultz is in serious jeopardy. The story eventually says she has no plans to step down and no decision will be made soon.

I doubt the Democrats would dump their chairman just before the Philadelphia convention. Wouldn’t that make Hillary look weak, like she had to mollify the Bernie faction to save the convention from disruption?

Sanders is going after the Florida congresswoman big time, even endorsing her primary opponent, Tim Canova, who has gotten a fundraising windfall. Wasserman Schultz insists she’s been neutral in the presidential contest, although by initially allowing just six debates—and burying them on Saturday nights and in holiday periods—she certainly seemed to be helping Clinton sit on her lead. More debates were added only when Hillary wanted the faceoffs as Sanders surged.

Now if Sanders somehow won the nomination, it would be routine for him to install his own person at the DNC. But Clinton has an insurmountable lead.

In the end, much of this is inside baseball. Whether Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains head of the party won’t affect 50 votes in November. But Bernie and his backers want her banished, and their weapon of choice, for now, is leaking to the press.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend ... (show quote)

Too bad,the Democrats/Communists love their ICON of stupidity.She is a great representative of the slime

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:32:44   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
There are some good democrats out there. Webb is one. Then there is - - - - - -. Help me out here -------.


CowboyMilt wrote:
Why don't we just shit can the whole DNC & put Trump in by Proclamation...then most of America would be very very happy!

Reply
 
 
May 29, 2016 13:33:17   #
LAPhil Loc: Los Angeles, CA
 
missinglink wrote:
There are some good democrats out there. Webb is one. Then there is - - - - - -. Help me out here -------.

I think you've pretty much exhausted the list.

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:45:44   #
Babsan
 
LAPhil wrote:
I think you've pretty much exhausted the list.


The list was too long to read.LoL

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:46:54   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
That's about it for me Phil. I guess I could bore down a few levels and find some junior senators with some real worth
but they remain invisible at the behest of their old school career several term master's. Same on both sides of the isle .
There is just many more dizzy wacko off the chart's parasitic oxygen thief's on the left than the right.

TERM LIMITS NOW !!

LAPhil wrote:
I think you've pretty much exhausted the list.

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:47:54   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
Babsan wrote:
The list was too long to read.LoL



Reply
 
 
May 29, 2016 13:50:48   #
Babsan
 

Reply
May 29, 2016 13:51:26   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
Every time she speaks and I inadvertently listen, see below


Babsan wrote:
Too bad,the Democrats/Communists love their ICON of stupidity.She is a great representative of the slime

I give myself a reality check. Yup , that hurts.
I give myself a reality check. Yup , that hurts....

Reply
May 29, 2016 15:05:49   #
Little Ball of Hate
 
missinglink wrote:
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend at Bernie's gang is wanting to fry her bacon.

There is a move on within the Democratic Party to silence her. How dare they. Outing one of their own.
The poster child for breaking the glass ceiling. Idiot or not . Moron or not . Blathering buffoon or not.
She has been held on high as one of the parties mouth pieces for years. Her voice is important and continues
to enlighten us believers in the rights of all narrow minded fixated dolts to speak their minds on the public's
greatest stage , the U S Senate. Speaking of witch ( pun intended ) where has Pelosi been ?
You go girl. Go anywhere else and please hurry .


The story

The knives are out for Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

And The Hill just served up a whole drawer full of them.

Without identifying who is wielding the weapons.

That’s how unnamed sources use the press to bloody their target.

There is no doubt that Wasserman Schultz has become a highly controversial chairman of the Democratic National Committee. She has pretty obviously tilted toward the establishment’s candidate, Hillary Clinton, and is now at war with Bernie Sanders and his supporters. I’m sure some Dems would love to dump her.

But does that mean someone should be allowed to say this, without his or her name attached?
2016 Election Headquarters

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics.
See Latest Coverage →

“‘There have been a lot of meetings over the past 48 hours about what color plate do we deliver Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s head on,’ said one pro-Clinton Democratic senator.”

Kind of a nauseating image, by the way.

The same anonymous senator is quoted as saying, “How can she open the convention? Sanders supporters would go nuts.”

Then there’s a “senior Senate Democratic aide” who says, “There’s a strong sentiment that the current situation is untenable and can only be fixed by her leaving.”

But it’s not fair to say the Hill piece has no on-the-record comments. A whole bunch of senators--Barbara Mikulski, Bill Nelson, Tim Kaine, Kirsten Gillibrand, Jeanne Shaneen—are quoted as backing Wasserman Schultz’s tenure. There are also statements of support from House Democratic leaders Nancy Pelosi and Steny Hoyer. But these are at the bottom of the piece, after this to-be-sure phrase: “The view that Wasserman Schultz should go in the name of party unity isn’t unanimous.”

Naturally, the Hill piece reverberated across the media landscape, including Fox News, adding to the sense that Wasserman Schultz is in serious jeopardy. The story eventually says she has no plans to step down and no decision will be made soon.

I doubt the Democrats would dump their chairman just before the Philadelphia convention. Wouldn’t that make Hillary look weak, like she had to mollify the Bernie faction to save the convention from disruption?

Sanders is going after the Florida congresswoman big time, even endorsing her primary opponent, Tim Canova, who has gotten a fundraising windfall. Wasserman Schultz insists she’s been neutral in the presidential contest, although by initially allowing just six debates—and burying them on Saturday nights and in holiday periods—she certainly seemed to be helping Clinton sit on her lead. More debates were added only when Hillary wanted the faceoffs as Sanders surged.

Now if Sanders somehow won the nomination, it would be routine for him to install his own person at the DNC. But Clinton has an insurmountable lead.

In the end, much of this is inside baseball. Whether Debbie Wasserman Schultz remains head of the party won’t affect 50 votes in November. But Bernie and his backers want her banished, and their weapon of choice, for now, is leaking to the press.

Howard Kurtz is a Fox News analyst and the host of "MediaBuzz" (Sundays 11 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET). He is the author of five books and is based in Washington. Follow him at @HowardKurtz. Click here for more information on Howard Kurtz.
The Shultz'ster has seen better days. The weekend ... (show quote)


It is a truism that evil eventually turns against itself.

Reply
May 29, 2016 17:03:08   #
Babsan
 
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
It is a truism that evil eventually turns against itself.
Listen guys and gals,this complete idiot should stay to remind us of how STUPID the Democrats actually are.They loose her then Pelosi steps in with her "fantastic" statements

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.