Hillary, The Unelectable Liar. ..Better Off Trusting a Rattlesnake Not To Bite
But those die hard liberal lemming don't care. ....why is that?....
Bernie Sanders Wins a General Election
10/26/2015 10:39 am ET | Updated Oct 26, 2015
9.3 K
editorial.huffingtonpost.com
Democrats must win swing states in 2016 to prevent Trump or another Republican from sitting in the Oval Office. Since voters in general elections normally wont vote for a candidate they dont like or at least find trustworthy, its imperative that a Democratic nominee hold positive favorability ratings going into Election Day.
I explain in great detail in my latest YouTube segment why Hillary Clinton is unelectable due to negative favorability polls nationwide and within swing states.
Also, it used to be important not have an ongoing FBI investigation linked to emails, but any controversy related to the former Secretary of State is viewed as a badge of honor to certain voters. Nonetheless, electability is always tied to winning battleground states, and Hillary Clinton faces an uphill battle pertaining to electoral votes in these regions.
Regarding swing states in 2016, Quinnipiac Universitys July and August Swing State Polls highlight that voters in Colorado, Iowa, Virginia, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania dont find Hillary Clinton to be trustworthy:
Colorado
Colorado voters say 62 - 34 percent that Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy; 52 - 46 percent that she has strong leadership qualities and 57 - 39 percent that she does not care about their needs and problems.
Iowa
Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, Iowa voters say 59 - 33 percent. She is a strong leader, voters say 52 - 43 percent, but she does not care about their needs and problems, voters say 55 - 39 percent.
Virginia
Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, Virginia voters say 55 - 39 percent. She is a strong leader, voters say 54 - 42 percent, but she does not care about their needs and problems, voters say 50 - 45 percent.
Florida
Clinton gets a negative 37 - 55 percent favorability rating and voters say 64 - 32 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
Ohio
Ohio voters give Clinton a negative 36 - 54 percent favorability rating and say 60 - 34 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania voters give Clinton a negative 38 - 55 percent favorability rating and say 63 - 32 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
A total of 95 electoral votes among these states could be lost because voters dont find Clinton to be honest or trustworthy in 2016.
Also according to Quinnipiac, voters in Colorado, Iowa, and Virginia believe Clinton does not care about their needs and problems.
If you base Clintons inevitability upon poll numbers, then make sure to include these facts in your narrative.
Low voter turnout linked to negative favorability numbers could result in a Republican victory in 2016, and when CBS News writes that within the Democratic Party fourteen percent would not support Hillary Clinton in an election, negative favorability is the culprit.
As for why Im voting only for Bernie Sanders, as a registered Democrat since 1997, I explain my thought process in this YouTube segment.
In fact, CBS News also states that among Democrats, Twenty-seven percent would support her with some reservations and another 11 percent would only back her because she is the nominee.
A great many progressives simply wont show up to the polls with a Clinton nomination (Hillary Clinton has neoconservative advisers, she once supported the TPP, Keystone XL, opposed gay marriage, etc.), and this sentiment is backed up by favorability ratings.
The same polls used to extol Hillary Clintons lead over Bernie Sanders among Democrats are also the same polls that illustrate voters nationwide dont trust and dont view the former Secretary of State in a favorable manner. According to Huffpost Pollsters Hillary Clinton Favorability Rating, the former Secretary of State has negative favorability ratings in 9 out of 10 national polls:
FAVORABLE UNFAVORABLE
AP-GfK (web): 41 48 Unfavorable +7
Morning Consult: 47 46 Favorable +1
NBC/WSJ: 39 48 Unfavorable +9
Emerson College
Polling Society: 42 55 Unfavorable +13
CNN: 46 50 Unfavorable +4
Morning Consult: 44 51 Unfavorable +7
YouGov/Economist: 43 49 Unfavorable +6
ABC/Post: 47 49 Unfavorable +2
CBS: 33 53 Unfavorable +20
Morning Consult: 42 53 Unfavorable +11
While Clinton only edged out a negative favorability by 1 point in the Morning Consult Poll, shes viewed as unfavorable by a startling margin of 20 points according to CBS. Compared to 2008 when Clinton barely had positive favorability ratings, almost every measurement of Hillary Clintons favorability within polls today show a candidate who isnt loved by the majority of voters.
In addition, Newsweek explains in an article titled The Likability Factor that Americans vote for people they find congenial, not candidates they dislike for some reason:
In 1984, Reagan struck voters as about 20 percent more likeable than Mondale. Bush defeated Dukakis largely because he triumphed in the congeniality competitionand later lost to Clinton largely because he didnt. After the Oct. 17, 2000 debate, voters rated Bush the more likable candidate, 60-30; four years later, Dubya whipped Kerry 52-41 in the same department. In other words, the candidate who won the debates may not have won the subsequent election but the candidate who came off as most congenial almost always did.
While the Benghazi marathon endeared Clinton to supporters, not all Americans view her defiance amidst controversy as presidential. Furthermore, Trump is also viewed negatively by voters, but his brand feeds off this controversy; hes benefited politically from pandering to the nativist and xenophobic elements of the GOP.
Remember, Hillary Clintons emails are the subject of an investigation, not Clinton. As for the uproar, Clinton has apologized via Facebook, saying Im sorry about it, and I take full responsibility.
Like Iraq, gay marriage, and other issues, Clinton has taken full responsibility for a prior viewpoint or decision, explained that her initial viewpoint or decision wasnt the right one, but was originally done nonetheless with the best intent, and moved on to support the prevailing viewpoint, or decision deemed prudent.
Also, the Clinton campaigns perpetual use of euphemisms, from witch hunt, mistake, evolve, convenience, Benghazi, BS scandal, shouting, and responsibility (I take full responsibility is a phrase used often) contributes to the viewpoint that the former Secretary of State isnt trustworthy.
Nationwide, not only does Clinton have negative favorability numbers that even reached 55 percent according to one CNN poll, but Yahoo writes that 57 percent of Americans say she is not honest and trustworthy.
Nobody wins a general election when close to 60 percent of Americans dont trust the candidate.
While its virtually impossible to convince many Clinton supporters that the FBIs investigation of her emails is different form the GOPs investigation of Benghazi, controversy is continually linked to the former Secretary of State. There are also issues with foreign donors and weapons deals tied to her tenure as Secretary of State, but again, any mention of poor decision-making is linked to the GOPs Benghazi hearings.
Finally, numerous polls show Bernie Sanders already defeats Donald Trump by a wider margin than Hillary Clinton in a general election. Sanders also has higher favorability ratings than Clinton or Trump and is a less polarizing figure.
What has taken Clinton and Trump decades and billions of dollars in name recognition to accomplish, Bernie Sanders has done with grass roots organizing and fundraising. Bernie Sanders surged from less than 1 percent last year to 29 percent support within the Democratic Party according to a recent Ipsos/Reuters poll. This surge will continue because of how polling trajectory is tied to both campaigns; Hillary is perpetually defending against scandal while Bernie is free to focus on issues. In fact, when Clinton isnt turning Benghazi into the political equivalent of the Alamo, or mentioning the NRA incessantly, she often times works very hard to copy Bernies progressive stances. In a very real sense, Bernie Sanders is the only electable Democrat for president, and also the only person setting the Democratic agenda in terms of ideas and policies in 2016.
Also on HuffPost:
Bernie Sanders On The Campaign Trail
Read more on editorial.huffingtonpost.com
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
But those die hard liberal lemming don't care. ....why is that?....
Bernie Sanders Wins a General Election
10/26/2015 10:39 am ET | Updated Oct 26, 2015
9.3 K
editorial.huffingtonpost.com
Democrats must win swing states in 2016 to prevent Trump or another Republican from sitting in the Oval Office. Since voters in general elections normally wont vote for a candidate they dont like or at least find trustworthy, its imperative that a Democratic nominee hold positive favorability ratings going into Election Day.
I explain in great detail in my latest YouTube segment why Hillary Clinton is unelectable due to negative favorability polls nationwide and within swing states.
Also, it used to be important not have an ongoing FBI investigation linked to emails, but any controversy related to the former Secretary of State is viewed as a badge of honor to certain voters. Nonetheless, electability is always tied to winning battleground states, and Hillary Clinton faces an uphill battle pertaining to electoral votes in these regions.
Regarding swing states in 2016, Quinnipiac Universitys July and August Swing State Polls highlight that voters in Colorado, Iowa, Virginia, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania dont find Hillary Clinton to be trustworthy:
Colorado
Colorado voters say 62 - 34 percent that Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy; 52 - 46 percent that she has strong leadership qualities and 57 - 39 percent that she does not care about their needs and problems.
Iowa
Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, Iowa voters say 59 - 33 percent. She is a strong leader, voters say 52 - 43 percent, but she does not care about their needs and problems, voters say 55 - 39 percent.
Virginia
Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, Virginia voters say 55 - 39 percent. She is a strong leader, voters say 54 - 42 percent, but she does not care about their needs and problems, voters say 50 - 45 percent.
Florida
Clinton gets a negative 37 - 55 percent favorability rating and voters say 64 - 32 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
Ohio
Ohio voters give Clinton a negative 36 - 54 percent favorability rating and say 60 - 34 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania voters give Clinton a negative 38 - 55 percent favorability rating and say 63 - 32 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
A total of 95 electoral votes among these states could be lost because voters dont find Clinton to be honest or trustworthy in 2016.
Also according to Quinnipiac, voters in Colorado, Iowa, and Virginia believe Clinton does not care about their needs and problems.
If you base Clintons inevitability upon poll numbers, then make sure to include these facts in your narrative.
Low voter turnout linked to negative favorability numbers could result in a Republican victory in 2016, and when CBS News writes that within the Democratic Party fourteen percent would not support Hillary Clinton in an election, negative favorability is the culprit.
As for why Im voting only for Bernie Sanders, as a registered Democrat since 1997, I explain my thought process in this YouTube segment.
In fact, CBS News also states that among Democrats, Twenty-seven percent would support her with some reservations and another 11 percent would only back her because she is the nominee.
A great many progressives simply wont show up to the polls with a Clinton nomination (Hillary Clinton has neoconservative advisers, she once supported the TPP, Keystone XL, opposed gay marriage, etc.), and this sentiment is backed up by favorability ratings.
The same polls used to extol Hillary Clintons lead over Bernie Sanders among Democrats are also the same polls that illustrate voters nationwide dont trust and dont view the former Secretary of State in a favorable manner. According to Huffpost Pollsters Hillary Clinton Favorability Rating, the former Secretary of State has negative favorability ratings in 9 out of 10 national polls:
FAVORABLE UNFAVORABLE
AP-GfK (web): 41 48 Unfavorable +7
Morning Consult: 47 46 Favorable +1
NBC/WSJ: 39 48 Unfavorable +9
Emerson College
Polling Society: 42 55 Unfavorable +13
CNN: 46 50 Unfavorable +4
Morning Consult: 44 51 Unfavorable +7
YouGov/Economist: 43 49 Unfavorable +6
ABC/Post: 47 49 Unfavorable +2
CBS: 33 53 Unfavorable +20
Morning Consult: 42 53 Unfavorable +11
While Clinton only edged out a negative favorability by 1 point in the Morning Consult Poll, shes viewed as unfavorable by a startling margin of 20 points according to CBS. Compared to 2008 when Clinton barely had positive favorability ratings, almost every measurement of Hillary Clintons favorability within polls today show a candidate who isnt loved by the majority of voters.
In addition, Newsweek explains in an article titled The Likability Factor that Americans vote for people they find congenial, not candidates they dislike for some reason:
In 1984, Reagan struck voters as about 20 percent more likeable than Mondale. Bush defeated Dukakis largely because he triumphed in the congeniality competitionand later lost to Clinton largely because he didnt. After the Oct. 17, 2000 debate, voters rated Bush the more likable candidate, 60-30; four years later, Dubya whipped Kerry 52-41 in the same department. In other words, the candidate who won the debates may not have won the subsequent election but the candidate who came off as most congenial almost always did.
While the Benghazi marathon endeared Clinton to supporters, not all Americans view her defiance amidst controversy as presidential. Furthermore, Trump is also viewed negatively by voters, but his brand feeds off this controversy; hes benefited politically from pandering to the nativist and xenophobic elements of the GOP.
Remember, Hillary Clintons emails are the subject of an investigation, not Clinton. As for the uproar, Clinton has apologized via Facebook, saying Im sorry about it, and I take full responsibility.
Like Iraq, gay marriage, and other issues, Clinton has taken full responsibility for a prior viewpoint or decision, explained that her initial viewpoint or decision wasnt the right one, but was originally done nonetheless with the best intent, and moved on to support the prevailing viewpoint, or decision deemed prudent.
Also, the Clinton campaigns perpetual use of euphemisms, from witch hunt, mistake, evolve, convenience, Benghazi, BS scandal, shouting, and responsibility (I take full responsibility is a phrase used often) contributes to the viewpoint that the former Secretary of State isnt trustworthy.
Nationwide, not only does Clinton have negative favorability numbers that even reached 55 percent according to one CNN poll, but Yahoo writes that 57 percent of Americans say she is not honest and trustworthy.
Nobody wins a general election when close to 60 percent of Americans dont trust the candidate.
While its virtually impossible to convince many Clinton supporters that the FBIs investigation of her emails is different form the GOPs investigation of Benghazi, controversy is continually linked to the former Secretary of State. There are also issues with foreign donors and weapons deals tied to her tenure as Secretary of State, but again, any mention of poor decision-making is linked to the GOPs Benghazi hearings.
Finally, numerous polls show Bernie Sanders already defeats Donald Trump by a wider margin than Hillary Clinton in a general election. Sanders also has higher favorability ratings than Clinton or Trump and is a less polarizing figure.
What has taken Clinton and Trump decades and billions of dollars in name recognition to accomplish, Bernie Sanders has done with grass roots organizing and fundraising. Bernie Sanders surged from less than 1 percent last year to 29 percent support within the Democratic Party according to a recent Ipsos/Reuters poll. This surge will continue because of how polling trajectory is tied to both campaigns; Hillary is perpetually defending against scandal while Bernie is free to focus on issues. In fact, when Clinton isnt turning Benghazi into the political equivalent of the Alamo, or mentioning the NRA incessantly, she often times works very hard to copy Bernies progressive stances. In a very real sense, Bernie Sanders is the only electable Democrat for president, and also the only person setting the Democratic agenda in terms of ideas and policies in 2016.
Also on HuffPost:
Bernie Sanders On The Campaign Trail
Read more on editorial.huffingtonpost.com
But those die hard liberal lemming don't care. ...... (
show quote)
Die hard liberal you piece of garbage you think Trump is telling you the truth. Your not a republican your a piece off out of touch shit that can't understand what's real and what BS. Go hide in a hole
tdsrnest wrote:
Die hard liberal you piece of garbage you think Trump is telling you the truth. Your not a republican your a piece off out of touch shit that can't understand what's real and what BS. Go hide in a hole
tdsrnest=simple solution to the election problems. Lets give Obama a third term-25 Years to life. PS. you would not support a slime ball like Hillary, would you ? Good Luck America !!!
tdsrnest wrote:
Die hard liberal you piece of garbage you think Trump is telling you the truth. Your not a republican your a piece off out of touch shit that can't understand what's real and what BS. Go hide in a hole
Well now turdtosser, did the truth from the huff and puff liberal news source touch a sore spot....kinda like your uncle remus did untill you got too old?
No hole for me libtard, too busy at work taking tax dollars to make weapons platforms, would not want that money wasted on stupid liberal shit like cleaning lead from rivers, feeding fat kids for free......Thank God for the Koch brothers and the great job they have done in our communities.........Douche' bag!
Ricko wrote:
tdsrnest=simple solution to the election problems. Lets give Obama a third term-25 Years to life. PS. you would not support a slime ball like Hillary, would you ? Good Luck America !!!
" -25 Years to life. " :lol: :lol: :lol:
Consider also: EVERY "swing state" on the map has passed either:
1. Mandatory "shall issue" laws, pertaining to permits to carry concealed weapons.
2. "Constitutional carry" laws, meaning no permit required.
Now consider Hillary's attacks on the NRA and gun owners, and the following:
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/426014/hillary-wrong-nra-more-popular-she-charles-c-w-cookeWeewillynobeerspilly wrote:
But those die hard liberal lemming don't care. ....why is that?....
Bernie Sanders Wins a General Election
10/26/2015 10:39 am ET | Updated Oct 26, 2015
9.3 K
editorial.huffingtonpost.com
Democrats must win swing states in 2016 to prevent Trump or another Republican from sitting in the Oval Office. Since voters in general elections normally wont vote for a candidate they dont like or at least find trustworthy, its imperative that a Democratic nominee hold positive favorability ratings going into Election Day.
I explain in great detail in my latest YouTube segment why Hillary Clinton is unelectable due to negative favorability polls nationwide and within swing states.
Also, it used to be important not have an ongoing FBI investigation linked to emails, but any controversy related to the former Secretary of State is viewed as a badge of honor to certain voters. Nonetheless, electability is always tied to winning battleground states, and Hillary Clinton faces an uphill battle pertaining to electoral votes in these regions.
Regarding swing states in 2016, Quinnipiac Universitys July and August Swing State Polls highlight that voters in Colorado, Iowa, Virginia, Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania dont find Hillary Clinton to be trustworthy:
Colorado
Colorado voters say 62 - 34 percent that Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy; 52 - 46 percent that she has strong leadership qualities and 57 - 39 percent that she does not care about their needs and problems.
Iowa
Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, Iowa voters say 59 - 33 percent. She is a strong leader, voters say 52 - 43 percent, but she does not care about their needs and problems, voters say 55 - 39 percent.
Virginia
Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy, Virginia voters say 55 - 39 percent. She is a strong leader, voters say 54 - 42 percent, but she does not care about their needs and problems, voters say 50 - 45 percent.
Florida
Clinton gets a negative 37 - 55 percent favorability rating and voters say 64 - 32 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
Ohio
Ohio voters give Clinton a negative 36 - 54 percent favorability rating and say 60 - 34 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania voters give Clinton a negative 38 - 55 percent favorability rating and say 63 - 32 percent she is not honest and trustworthy.
A total of 95 electoral votes among these states could be lost because voters dont find Clinton to be honest or trustworthy in 2016.
Also according to Quinnipiac, voters in Colorado, Iowa, and Virginia believe Clinton does not care about their needs and problems.
If you base Clintons inevitability upon poll numbers, then make sure to include these facts in your narrative.
Low voter turnout linked to negative favorability numbers could result in a Republican victory in 2016, and when CBS News writes that within the Democratic Party fourteen percent would not support Hillary Clinton in an election, negative favorability is the culprit.
As for why Im voting only for Bernie Sanders, as a registered Democrat since 1997, I explain my thought process in this YouTube segment.
In fact, CBS News also states that among Democrats, Twenty-seven percent would support her with some reservations and another 11 percent would only back her because she is the nominee.
A great many progressives simply wont show up to the polls with a Clinton nomination (Hillary Clinton has neoconservative advisers, she once supported the TPP, Keystone XL, opposed gay marriage, etc.), and this sentiment is backed up by favorability ratings.
The same polls used to extol Hillary Clintons lead over Bernie Sanders among Democrats are also the same polls that illustrate voters nationwide dont trust and dont view the former Secretary of State in a favorable manner. According to Huffpost Pollsters Hillary Clinton Favorability Rating, the former Secretary of State has negative favorability ratings in 9 out of 10 national polls:
FAVORABLE UNFAVORABLE
AP-GfK (web): 41 48 Unfavorable +7
Morning Consult: 47 46 Favorable +1
NBC/WSJ: 39 48 Unfavorable +9
Emerson College
Polling Society: 42 55 Unfavorable +13
CNN: 46 50 Unfavorable +4
Morning Consult: 44 51 Unfavorable +7
YouGov/Economist: 43 49 Unfavorable +6
ABC/Post: 47 49 Unfavorable +2
CBS: 33 53 Unfavorable +20
Morning Consult: 42 53 Unfavorable +11
While Clinton only edged out a negative favorability by 1 point in the Morning Consult Poll, shes viewed as unfavorable by a startling margin of 20 points according to CBS. Compared to 2008 when Clinton barely had positive favorability ratings, almost every measurement of Hillary Clintons favorability within polls today show a candidate who isnt loved by the majority of voters.
In addition, Newsweek explains in an article titled The Likability Factor that Americans vote for people they find congenial, not candidates they dislike for some reason:
In 1984, Reagan struck voters as about 20 percent more likeable than Mondale. Bush defeated Dukakis largely because he triumphed in the congeniality competitionand later lost to Clinton largely because he didnt. After the Oct. 17, 2000 debate, voters rated Bush the more likable candidate, 60-30; four years later, Dubya whipped Kerry 52-41 in the same department. In other words, the candidate who won the debates may not have won the subsequent election but the candidate who came off as most congenial almost always did.
While the Benghazi marathon endeared Clinton to supporters, not all Americans view her defiance amidst controversy as presidential. Furthermore, Trump is also viewed negatively by voters, but his brand feeds off this controversy; hes benefited politically from pandering to the nativist and xenophobic elements of the GOP.
Remember, Hillary Clintons emails are the subject of an investigation, not Clinton. As for the uproar, Clinton has apologized via Facebook, saying Im sorry about it, and I take full responsibility.
Like Iraq, gay marriage, and other issues, Clinton has taken full responsibility for a prior viewpoint or decision, explained that her initial viewpoint or decision wasnt the right one, but was originally done nonetheless with the best intent, and moved on to support the prevailing viewpoint, or decision deemed prudent.
Also, the Clinton campaigns perpetual use of euphemisms, from witch hunt, mistake, evolve, convenience, Benghazi, BS scandal, shouting, and responsibility (I take full responsibility is a phrase used often) contributes to the viewpoint that the former Secretary of State isnt trustworthy.
Nationwide, not only does Clinton have negative favorability numbers that even reached 55 percent according to one CNN poll, but Yahoo writes that 57 percent of Americans say she is not honest and trustworthy.
Nobody wins a general election when close to 60 percent of Americans dont trust the candidate.
While its virtually impossible to convince many Clinton supporters that the FBIs investigation of her emails is different form the GOPs investigation of Benghazi, controversy is continually linked to the former Secretary of State. There are also issues with foreign donors and weapons deals tied to her tenure as Secretary of State, but again, any mention of poor decision-making is linked to the GOPs Benghazi hearings.
Finally, numerous polls show Bernie Sanders already defeats Donald Trump by a wider margin than Hillary Clinton in a general election. Sanders also has higher favorability ratings than Clinton or Trump and is a less polarizing figure.
What has taken Clinton and Trump decades and billions of dollars in name recognition to accomplish, Bernie Sanders has done with grass roots organizing and fundraising. Bernie Sanders surged from less than 1 percent last year to 29 percent support within the Democratic Party according to a recent Ipsos/Reuters poll. This surge will continue because of how polling trajectory is tied to both campaigns; Hillary is perpetually defending against scandal while Bernie is free to focus on issues. In fact, when Clinton isnt turning Benghazi into the political equivalent of the Alamo, or mentioning the NRA incessantly, she often times works very hard to copy Bernies progressive stances. In a very real sense, Bernie Sanders is the only electable Democrat for president, and also the only person setting the Democratic agenda in terms of ideas and policies in 2016.
Also on HuffPost:
Bernie Sanders On The Campaign Trail
Read more on editorial.huffingtonpost.com
But those die hard liberal lemming don't care. ...... (
show quote)
Ricko wrote:
tdsrnest=simple solution to the election problems. Lets give Obama a third term-25 Years to life. PS. you would not support a slime ball like Hillary, would you ? Good Luck America !!!
I wouldn't support a slim ball like Trump or Cruz. Good luck to the middle class if either one of those get elected. Just like Reagan and Bush you fu$king idiots are ready to put them on Rishmore.
tdsrnest wrote:
I wouldn't support a slim ball like Trump or Cruz. Good luck to the middle class if either one of those get elected. Just like Reagan and Bush you fu$king idiots are ready to put them on Rishmore.
So under your idol Obummer, the top 20% are doing fantastic and the bottom 80% are running in place.
son of witless wrote:
So under your idol Obummer, the top 20% are doing fantastic and the bottom 80% are running in place.
What the hell are you talking about you need to explain that comment
tdsrnest wrote:
What the hell are you talking about you need to explain that comment
You made a crack about the middle class under the Republicans and your side is forever preaching class warfare. I merely pointed out that under your socialist idiot the middle and lower classes have done far worse than the upper crust that your socialist idiot is forever bashing.
The figures about the 20% doing great and the 80% being screwed under your socialist idiot I got from an evil capitalist on TV.
The more your socialist idiot bashes the evil rich the better they do and the more your socialist idiot tries to help the lower 80% the more he screws them.
There you go, comment explained, question answered. If only you guys could answer direct questions we could solve the World's problems.
son of witless wrote:
You made a crack about the middle class under the Republicans and your side is forever preaching class warfare. I merely pointed out that under your socialist idiot the middle and lower classes have done far worse than the upper crust that your socialist idiot is forever bashing.
The figures about the 20% doing great and the 80% being screwed under your socialist idiot I got from an evil capitalist on TV.
The more your socialist idiot bashes the evil rich the better they do and the more your socialist idiot tries to help the lower 80% the more he screws them.
There you go, comment explained, question answered. If only you guys could answer direct questions we could solve the World's problems.
You made a crack about the middle class under the... (
show quote)
You fucking moron read the American jobs act and learn something. Your idiot legislators blocked it.
tdsrnest wrote:
You fucking moron read the American jobs act and learn something. Your idiot legislators blocked it.
" You fucking moron " Now is that the way we talk in public? Did I call you a " fucking moron "?
As far as your reference to " the American jobs act " . Are you referring to the Ted Cruz introduced American Jobs First Act of 2015 (S. 2394)?
son of witless wrote:
" You fucking moron " Now is that the way we talk in public? Did I call you a " fucking moron "?
As far as your reference to " the American jobs act " . Are you referring to the Ted Cruz introduced American Jobs First Act of 2015 (S. 2394)?
No you fuc$king moron the American jobs act by Obama in 2012 you fuc$king dope. And Texas lying Ted Cruz never proposed or even sponsored any kind of Bill. The only thing Lying Ted Cruz accomplished was to shut down the government but of course out of touch fu$kng bible toting idiots like you would not have a clue. I say it again. (FU$KING MORON) that's the only thing you retards understand. You must be from Texas because your ignorance is so apparent
Here you go fu$king dope
son of witless wrote:
" You fucking moron " Now is that the way we talk in public? Did I call you a " fucking moron "?
As far as your reference to " the American jobs act " . Are you referring to the Ted Cruz introduced American Jobs First Act of 2015 (S. 2394)?
Here's some more you moron
tdsrnest wrote:
No you fuc$king moron the American jobs act by Obama in 2012 you fuc$king dope. And Texas lying Ted Cruz never proposed or even sponsored any kind of Bill. The only thing Lying Ted Cruz accomplished was to shut down the government but of course out of touch fu$kng bible toting idiots like you would not have a clue. I say it again. (FU$KING MORON) that's the only thing you retards understand. You must be from Texas because your ignorance is so apparent
Why are liberals always so hateful? I come here to discuss these matters in a calm respectful way and you call me profane names. I did not call you a f**king moron. Yet only because I see the World a little differently from you, you call me a f**king moron.
No sane person can have a decent conversation with a jackass who thinks Obama is a good President. How stupid do you have to be to vote for a clown like that? As it turns out, you have to be so stupid that even leaders on your own side secretly admit that they count on Obama voters to be stupid. Jonathan Gruber said he counted on the stupidity of the American voter to pass Obamacare. Well my boy he wasn't talking about me when he mentioned stupid. That only leaves you!
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.