One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
You Know You're in a Blue State When
Page <<first <prev 6 of 8 next> last>>
Nov 17, 2013 23:40:07   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
alex wrote:
if this is true why does obozocare require men to purchase maternity insurance


because they cause the maternities?

Reply
Nov 17, 2013 23:44:47   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
alex wrote:
not the RICH democrats!!!!!!!!


The rich don't seem to understand that, if the poor had more money, that would be more for the rich to take from them. So a minimum wage hike would only roll right back to where it came from. I give you $5 then I charge you $5 for breathing my air. See ? 0 impact.

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 06:53:40   #
Poco624
 
alex wrote:
not the RICH democrats!!!!!!!!


I really don't know what you are trying to say about the RICH Dems other than they voted against raising the minimum wage. Only 6 Dems joined the 227 Republicans in voting against raising the minimum from $7.25 to $10.10 in March 2013.

Those 6 Democrats are as un-American as the 227 Republicans. I have never seen a group of people fighting for more poverty, the uneducated, and against the first black president, who, BTW is trying to modernize this country.

Do you know that 80% of Texans only have a high school diploma? That is what happens to a state after it has been under Republican rule for almost 20 years. Now is that something to celebrate? I find it rather appalling myself.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2013 11:22:44   #
Poco624
 
rickdri wrote:
I'm not preaching to you from any balcony. What they did was reprehensible. However if you think that banning guns is the answer that will not help. Do you think criminals follow the law? They don't buy guns from gun shops. They buy them on the streets. Gun violence will only end when we take steps to help those with mental health issues. They fall under the radar and end up doing terrible things. That needs to be addressed first. Preventing them from getting guns will help too but, only after their mental issues are dealt with first. As for abortions you are entitled to your opinion. However just because I can't have a baby doesn't mean I can't have an opinion.
I'm not preaching to you from any balcony. What th... (show quote)


Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but the NRA opposes any restrictions. You should know that, and why is it that the anti-choicers are the one's who own most of the guns? The Democrats who own guns are the one's who think background checks should be expanded and a limit put on the number of bullets in a magazine. That didn't go over very well in Colorado when the Republicans ousted two Dems who wanted to protect more people from being killed. And the Republicans jumped in and said we can't have people's lives being saved, we want more to die, we want more guns.

Banning guns in Australia was the way for them to go, even the actor Hugh Jackman is sorry that the US has a 2nd Amendment in the Constitution. Australia has not had a mass murder from guns since 1996 and you will never say that about America. People just do not die when shot, many are left paralyzed and some lose their eyesight, their arms and legs.

Seriously, in Texas they can now carry long guns in the open; it is called "open carry Texas" or OCT. Now, that is just how much those "bloodthirsty rightwing Christians" care about the lives of children or their parents. When 4 moms from "Moms Demand Action" were having a meeting in a restaurant they gathered outside and terrorized them until they called the police.

Far Right Defends Armed Protesters Who Gathered To Intimidate "Moms Demand Action" (11.11.13)
http://www.nationalmemo.com/far-right-defends-armed-protesters-who-gathered-to-intimidate-moms-demand-action/

Why did the right become so outraged when Wendy Davis said she was pro-life? Your version of pro-life ends at birth, our version begins at birth. Time in the womb is about 9 months, outside can be a 100 plus years. Your version is just a way to control women, tell them what they can do or can't do with their own bodies.

Wendy Davis Redefines "Pro-Life" Enrages Anti-Choicers
http://www.nationalmemo.com/wendy-davis-redefines-pro-life-enrages-anti-choicers/ (11.6.13)

Your pro-life opinion should be about your wife, girlfriend or any other women in your family and that is where it should end. Controlling other men's wives or girlfriends is up to them, not the GOP government, they are not paying for those childrens future. And since they just want to keep their constitutents from having ObamaCare because of their hatred from our first black president, the taxpayer will continue to pay for those unwanted births.

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 12:02:47   #
SchoonerPete
 
I'm not sure what medication you're on, but I recommend you get another doctor and have your dosage changed, or put on a different medication. You're halluciating with ths drivel you're spewing. I can't believe you really believe any of this, because it's pure malarky!

Poco624 wrote:
Sorry, I don't have to read anything to know that women have freedom in a blue state, in red states they have no freedom and this is in the 21st Century. So, don't go pushing your Conservative propaganda down my throat.

I live in a blue state that was recently taken over by the anti-choice GOP and already the poverty level is 18%. We have lost our freedom to vote, our freedom to choose, so GO POVERTY GO, GO UNEDUCATED GO, GOANTICHOICEGO.

In blue states women have a right to choose if the have children or not, that is not true in red states. They just love controlling other men's wives and girlfriends. THIS IS THE 21ST CENTURY, NOT THE 19TH.

So, if you do not mind the government controlling your wifes body or your girlfriends, then enjoy your time in a red state.

Personally, I want the government out of women's panties.
Sorry, I don't have to read anything to know that ... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 12:04:43   #
SchoonerPete
 
Hooray NRA! Leave my guns alone! If you don't like guns, move to Australia, but leave my guns alone...bleeding heart liberal!

Poco624 wrote:
Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but the NRA opposes any restrictions. You should know that, and why is it that the anti-choicers are the one's who own most of the guns? The Democrats who own guns are the one's who think background checks should be expanded and a limit put on the number of bullets in a magazine. That didn't go over very well in Colorado when the Republicans ousted two Dems who wanted to protect more people from being killed. And the Republicans jumped in and said we can't have people's lives being saved, we want more to die, we want more guns.

Banning guns in Australia was the way for them to go, even the actor Hugh Jackman is sorry that the US has a 2nd Amendment in the Constitution. Australia has not had a mass murder from guns since 1996 and you will never say that about America. People just do not die when shot, many are left paralyzed and some lose their eyesight, their arms and legs.

Seriously, in Texas they can now carry long guns in the open; it is called "open carry Texas" or OCT. Now, that is just how much those "bloodthirsty rightwing Christians" care about the lives of children or their parents. When 4 moms from "Moms Demand Action" were having a meeting in a restaurant they gathered outside and terrorized them until they called the police.

Far Right Defends Armed Protesters Who Gathered To Intimidate "Moms Demand Action" (11.11.13)
http://www.nationalmemo.com/far-right-defends-armed-protesters-who-gathered-to-intimidate-moms-demand-action/

Why did the right become so outraged when Wendy Davis said she was pro-life? Your version of pro-life ends at birth, our version begins at birth. Time in the womb is about 9 months, outside can be a 100 plus years. Your version is just a way to control women, tell them what they can do or can't do with their own bodies.

Wendy Davis Redefines "Pro-Life" Enrages Anti-Choicers
http://www.nationalmemo.com/wendy-davis-redefines-pro-life-enrages-anti-choicers/ (11.6.13)

Your pro-life opinion should be about your wife, girlfriend or any other women in your family and that is where it should end. Controlling other men's wives or girlfriends is up to them, not the GOP government, they are not paying for those childrens future. And since they just want to keep their constitutents from having ObamaCare because of their hatred from our first black president, the taxpayer will continue to pay for those unwanted births.
Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but th... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 12:06:04   #
SchoonerPete
 
Obama is NOT trying to modernize this country, he's ruining it! I guess you like communism? God! What rock do you commies crawl out from under???!!! You talk about education, you're an idiot!

Poco624 wrote:
I really don't know what you are trying to say about the RICH Dems other than they voted against raising the minimum wage. Only 6 Dems joined the 227 Republicans in voting against raising the minimum from $7.25 to $10.10 in March 2013.

Those 6 Democrats are as un-American as the 227 Republicans. I have never seen a group of people fighting for more poverty, the uneducated, and against the first black president, who, BTW is trying to modernize this country.

Do you know that 80% of Texans only have a high school diploma? That is what happens to a state after it has been under Republican rule for almost 20 years. Now is that something to celebrate? I find it rather appalling myself.
I really don't know what you are trying to say abo... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2013 12:46:03   #
SchoonerPete
 
Thank you for this post! I currently have my NRA renewal notice in front of me, which I was just about to renew for one more year. Thanks to your post, I decided instead to renew for five years! I decided to help the NRA in their fight against you communists. I just wanted you to know.

Poco624 wrote:
Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but the NRA opposes any restrictions. You should know that, and why is it that the anti-choicers are the one's who own most of the guns? The Democrats who own guns are the one's who think background checks should be expanded and a limit put on the number of bullets in a magazine. That didn't go over very well in Colorado when the Republicans ousted two Dems who wanted to protect more people from being killed. And the Republicans jumped in and said we can't have people's lives being saved, we want more to die, we want more guns.

Banning guns in Australia was the way for them to go, even the actor Hugh Jackman is sorry that the US has a 2nd Amendment in the Constitution. Australia has not had a mass murder from guns since 1996 and you will never say that about America. People just do not die when shot, many are left paralyzed and some lose their eyesight, their arms and legs.

Seriously, in Texas they can now carry long guns in the open; it is called "open carry Texas" or OCT. Now, that is just how much those "bloodthirsty rightwing Christians" care about the lives of children or their parents. When 4 moms from "Moms Demand Action" were having a meeting in a restaurant they gathered outside and terrorized them until they called the police.

Far Right Defends Armed Protesters Who Gathered To Intimidate "Moms Demand Action" (11.11.13)
http://www.nationalmemo.com/far-right-defends-armed-protesters-who-gathered-to-intimidate-moms-demand-action/

Why did the right become so outraged when Wendy Davis said she was pro-life? Your version of pro-life ends at birth, our version begins at birth. Time in the womb is about 9 months, outside can be a 100 plus years. Your version is just a way to control women, tell them what they can do or can't do with their own bodies.

Wendy Davis Redefines "Pro-Life" Enrages Anti-Choicers
http://www.nationalmemo.com/wendy-davis-redefines-pro-life-enrages-anti-choicers/ (11.6.13)

Your pro-life opinion should be about your wife, girlfriend or any other women in your family and that is where it should end. Controlling other men's wives or girlfriends is up to them, not the GOP government, they are not paying for those childrens future. And since they just want to keep their constitutents from having ObamaCare because of their hatred from our first black president, the taxpayer will continue to pay for those unwanted births.
Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but th... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 13:47:41   #
rickdri
 
gain
Poco624 wrote:
Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but the NRA opposes any restrictions. You should know that, and why is it that the anti-choicers are the one's who own most of the guns? The Democrats who own guns are the one's who think background checks should be expanded and a limit put on the number of bullets in a magazine. That didn't go over very well in Colorado when the Republicans ousted two Dems who wanted to protect more people from being killed. And the Republicans jumped in and said we can't have people's lives being saved, we want more to die, we want more guns.

Banning guns in Australia was the way for them to go, even the actor Hugh Jackman is sorry that the US has a 2nd Amendment in the Constitution. Australia has not had a mass murder from guns since 1996 and you will never say that about America. People just do not die when shot, many are left paralyzed and some lose their eyesight, their arms and legs.

Seriously, in Texas they can now carry long guns in the open; it is called "open carry Texas" or OCT. Now, that is just how much those "bloodthirsty rightwing Christians" care about the lives of children or their parents. When 4 moms from "Moms Demand Action" were having a meeting in a restaurant they gathered outside and terrorized them until they called the police.

Far Right Defends Armed Protesters Who Gathered To Intimidate "Moms Demand Action" (11.11.13)
http://www.nationalmemo.com/far-right-defends-armed-protesters-who-gathered-to-intimidate-moms-demand-action/

Why did the right become so outraged when Wendy Davis said she was pro-life? Your version of pro-life ends at birth, our version begins at birth. Time in the womb is about 9 months, outside can be a 100 plus years. Your version is just a way to control women, tell them what they can do or can't do with their own bodies.

Wendy Davis Redefines "Pro-Life" Enrages Anti-Choicers
http://www.nationalmemo.com/wendy-davis-redefines-pro-life-enrages-anti-choicers/ (11.6.13)

Your pro-life opinion should be about your wife, girlfriend or any other women in your family and that is where it should end. Controlling other men's wives or girlfriends is up to them, not the GOP government, they are not paying for those childrens future. And since they just want to keep their constitutents from having ObamaCare because of their hatred from our first black president, the taxpayer will continue to pay for those unwanted births.
Restricting gun ownership is the way to go, but th... (show quote)


Yes and because I disagree with Obama I am called racist. I disagreed with Clinton was I racist then? I don't hate Obama, just disagree, and the vast majority of the people that disagree with him are not racist and do not hate him. You liberals love to tell everyone else how they feel about Obama even though it's not true. You talk about controlling women's lives, I have no desire to control anyone's life as do liberals by telling them they have to buy insurance they don't need. My wife and I am in our 50's and will never have another child yet Obamacare says we have to carry policies that have prenatal care. There are many other things that we have to carry now that we will not need for in insurance yet Obama says we have to have it. You want to take guns away from people that have never committed a crime. You want to force people to drink small sodas and not have salt as did the New York City Mayor. You think you know what is best for everyone and then pass laws to enforce all of these things.
No I have no desire to control anyone else. I only desire to tell women what a mistake abortion is. If a woman wants an abortion far be it from me to stop them. I do have a right to an opinion regardless of what you say. There again you are telling me what I can have an opinion on and what I can't. Typical liberal control. We have a huge difference of opinion. That's fine. I believe abortion is wrong and you don't. You want to have an abortion that's you decision. Just don't tell me I don't have a right to my own opinion!

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 17:28:09   #
son of witless
 
lpnmajor wrote:
because they cause the maternities?



Why do men die before women? They want to.

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 17:57:38   #
jcahill425
 
bmac32 wrote:
Your dead wrong, I do not have a party! I look around and states with republican governors are doing better than those controlled by democrats.


I want some sources here, because I posted some evidence on page 1 that shows GOP states have higher poverty and lower education levels

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2013 18:13:17   #
jcahill425
 
sn of witless wrote:
No cherry pickin there, huh? Why doncha cite unemployment rates by states? Why doncha cite state debt and unfunded pension liabilities?

Facts are facts and yes depending how you arrange them , they can lie. You know lying, right? Name the last Democrat in the White House who was not a serial liar.


My whole point was that it is easy to take advantage of people when you keep them dumb and poor. There is no disputing that red states are the dumbest and poorest, and also receive more welfare. When I look at
debt I understand that some states have more people than others, and logically they would have to spend more, so I look at the per capita numbers and overall I would say it is a pretty even split:

http://www.governing.com/gov-data/state-debt-per-capita-figures.html

And even though unemployment numbers mean nothing to me since it only includes people actively seeking employment and does not include people who have gotten discouraged and stopped looking, nor does it include the underemployed, the numbers there are mixed too:

http://www.bls.gov/web/laus/laumstrk.htm

Now you can talk about blue states all you want, and yes, some spend more money than others, but it is impossible to deny that blue states are doing more for the people. They are educating their people better, keeping them out of poverty and off food stamps, assisting them with health insurance, and taking care of the most vulnerable people who need it the most.

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 18:24:52   #
jcahill425
 
SchoonerPete wrote:
I sure hope you live in a blue state because I want to live as far away as possible from anyone who thinks like you do. I live in a red state and wouldn't live anywhere else. You can keep your liberal politics and blue states. My kids live in a blue state, and they're trying to move out as soon as possible.

Of course, you're comparing apples to oranges in your argument. A better analysis would be to compare them over a 40-50 year period instead of using current data. But, then you don't want to do that as that would ruin your argument. Try reading this:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/09/the_myth_of_red_state_welfare.html
I sure hope you live in a blue state because I wan... (show quote)


I'm actually pretty happy I don't live in a red state. My state's average IQ is over 86 and a majority of children know that earth is over 6k years old. In my state it is not more difficult to vote than to get a gun. In my state minimum wage is almost bearable and average wages are much higher. We believe in rights for women and minorities. My state is one of the most liberal states in the union, and we have had universal health care for years now, and guess what, it works. It didn't destroy our economy or ruin our way of life. And it was glitchy at first, but now less than a decade later, the populace could not be happier. Same for gay marriage. This is the 21st century, not the 19th, get with the times

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 18:30:17   #
jcahill425
 
vernon wrote:
you are full of it i live just about as far south as you can get without getting my feet wet and and we all know its7k yrs old.but when we get a threat we investigate and not wait to get our arse blown off.and you voted for kennedys like clock work and they are all low lifes.


Lowlifes or not JFK did more for this country than any POTUS since and the Kennedys have helped make Massachusetts a great state. Joe Kennedy started the fuel assistance program when I was a kid that helped poor families afford high winter bills. The list of things they havedone to help people is too long to post

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 19:18:06   #
jcahill425
 
alex wrote:
if this is true why does obozocare require men to purchase maternity insurance


Oh lord more misinformed propaganda. Men aren't forced to pay for maternity insurance, it is a standard that certain level plans must include, just like there is preventive care for prostate cancer that certain levels must include. How can people say that this is a bad thing? Insurance companies must now include things that can save lives or make life easier for everybody. Last I checked, men help create babies. I also believe a father, unless by rape or incest, should have some right to say whether he wants an abortion, the choice should not be only up to the woman. But they also benefit from these women getting that insurance. It benefits everybody and honestly we pay insurance companies enough, they should cover the minimum essentials.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.