One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Political survival of the GOP
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Nov 17, 2013 22:02:32   #
son of witless
 
bluejacket wrote:
no supply side does not work , it facilitates the wealth gap and accelerates the accumulation of wealth at the top


Son, where did you get your views from? Public education no doubt. America has always been about new people rising from the bottom. In Europe you have little class mobility. In the USA, most of our millionaires were self made. On their way up they take many with them.

Even the evil corporations are good. Bitch all you want about them, then buy their stocks and make money. Invest and enjoy, enjoy.

I can cite the Reagan era. I can even cite the Clinton era as capitalism successes. Even the Bush era in totality was pretty damn good. Now look at the numbers for your socialist hero Barak.

I have backed up my words. Now back up your words.

Reply
Nov 17, 2013 22:17:42   #
bluejacket
 
BigMike wrote:
Supply side is not the problem. Corruption is the problem.


in a sense you are right supply side is only part of the problem , corporate control of politics of the country is another aspect of what is wrong

Reply
Nov 17, 2013 22:34:32   #
son of witless
 
bluejacket wrote:
in a sense you are right supply side is only part of the problem , corporate control of politics of the country is another aspect of what is wrong


Corporate control? What is that? For 5 years Democrats have run things. I don't care about corporate control. I care about crony capital control. The thing about corporations that keeps them under control is that they have to compete with one another.

Under your socialist leader we have corporations who can buy their way into power. That gives them advantage over the good corporations. The evil corporations who screwed up your buddy's stupid website seem to have had connections in high places if you catch my drift. I find it all funny as hell. As funny as other cronies with high connections all benefiting from green subsidies before going bankrupt. I pray that is the corporate control you meant, but I really, really doubt it.

Reply
 
 
Nov 17, 2013 23:21:03   #
bluejacket
 
son of witless wrote:
Corporate control? What is that? For 5 years Democrats have run things. I don't care about corporate control. I care about crony capital control. The thing about corporations that keeps them under control is that they have to compete with one another.

Under your socialist leader we have corporations who can buy their way into power. That gives them advantage over the good corporations. The evil corporations who screwed up your buddy's stupid website seem to have had connections in high places if you catch my drift. I find it all funny as hell. As funny as other cronies with high connections all benefiting from green subsidies before going bankrupt. I pray that is the corporate control you meant, but I really, really doubt it.
Corporate control? What is that? For 5 years Democ... (show quote)


Obama is no more a socialist than Bush was a fascist , but the corporate control was the same , so clean up your rhetoric and get to the basics, you bandy around words that you have little or no understanding of

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 02:38:53   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
bluejacket wrote:
in a sense you are right supply side is only part of the problem , corporate control of politics of the country is another aspect of what is wrong


I repeat, supply side is NOT the problem. Corruption, on the part of business AND politicians is the problem.

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 07:57:10   #
bluejacket
 
BigMike wrote:
I repeat, supply side is NOT the problem. Corruption, on the part of business AND politicians is the problem.


how can supply side not be part of the problem as it is a mechanism to shifting wealth to the top of the ladder and deterring wealth accumulation for the lower economic levels

Reply
Nov 18, 2013 17:43:34   #
son of witless
 
bluejacket wrote:
Obama is no more a socialist than Bush was a fascist , but the corporate control was the same , so clean up your rhetoric and get to the basics, you bandy around words that you have little or no understanding of


Clean up my rhetoric? Hmmmm ! How to get through to you?

Okay, forget about corporate, socialist, and fascist.

You sound as if you are educated. Have you ever heard of Patronage? It basically means crony capitalism. You are right that Obama is not a classic Socialist. His " Rhetoric " is for the unwashed masses who swallow that class warfare schtick. He gives them bread and circuses to keep them in line . but does not want them movin on up to the East Side. (References to Rome and the Jeffersons.)

Your guy practices Patronage. He scares the rich with taxes and his street mobs. Then he cuts deals with the rich who are on his side. Government contracts for political contributions. It's the " Chicago Way ". The rich who don't pay up to this protection racket get attacked and screwed.

Reply
 
 
Nov 18, 2013 18:00:13   #
bluejacket
 
son of witless wrote:
Clean up my rhetoric? Hmmmm ! How to get through to you?

Okay, forget about corporate, socialist, and fascist.

You sound as if you are educated. Have you ever heard of Patronage? It basically means crony capitalism. You are right that Obama is not a classic Socialist. His " Rhetoric " is for the unwashed masses who swallow that class warfare schtick. He gives them bread and circuses to keep them in line . but does not want them movin on up to the East Side. (References to Rome and the Jeffersons.)

Your guy practices Patronage. He scares the rich with taxes and his street mobs. Then he cuts deals with the rich who are on his side. Government contracts for political contributions. It's the " Chicago Way ". The rich who don't pay up to this protection racket get attacked and screwed.
Clean up my rhetoric? Hmmmm ! How to get through t... (show quote)


the only street mobs I see are the teaparty and the gun nuts that intimidate people who are gathered to talk about gun issues , the only street mobs are mostly on the extreme right

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 21:35:21   #
son of witless
 
bluejacket wrote:
the only street mobs I see are the teaparty and the gun nuts that intimidate people who are gathered to talk about gun issues , the only street mobs are mostly on the extreme right


You have a selective memory. Yes, quite selective Sir. Give me examples of Tea Party street mobs. I bet you can't. Tea Party rallies have been models of public discourse. Models! They leave the spaces even cleaner than they found them. The most peaceable protesters in the known universe.

Compare that to the pigs who took over public spaces, camped out for weeks in squalor, caused thousands of dollars in clean up costs, and failed to prevent rapes with in their stinking camps. Ever hear of OWS?

Those aren't even the street mobs I meant. I meant in the spring of 2010 mobs of leftists in the hundreds would show up at the homes of targeted bank officials. At their homes!

Yes Sir, you have a very very selective memory.

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 22:48:31   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
bluejacket wrote:
how can supply side not be part of the problem as it is a mechanism to shifting wealth to the top of the ladder and deterring wealth accumulation for the lower economic levels


Corrupt people corrupt the mechanism. There is nothing inherently wrong with supply side economics.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_economics

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 22:50:46   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
bluejacket wrote:
the only street mobs I see are the teaparty and the gun nuts that intimidate people who are gathered to talk about gun issues , the only street mobs are mostly on the extreme right


Tea Party mobs? Haven't seen any reporting of that on CNN. I think you're exaggerating.

Reply
 
 
Nov 19, 2013 22:53:07   #
larry
 
Mom8052 wrote:
Witless, the Democratic Party with the help of Obama is taking the citizens of our great nation into proverty. I am a Democrat, wishing to hell that my party would straighten up and realize that their agenda will make the US into a slave nation. Taxation without representation. This is just really pissing me off.


Is this your first glimpse at socialism? If you let this continue,you well not like it at all.

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 22:56:53   #
larry
 
LAwrence wrote:
As a bible believing Christian I have learned down through the years when a church goes apostate you cant reform or change it. the only solution is to leave it and join with other bible believers. The same goes with politics. When the republican party becomes so much like the fascist, communist democrats there is only one solution. Leave it to wallow in its own filth of degradation. There is no hope for America now. The people have been thoroughly indoctrinated by the powers that be. May God's will be done.
As a bible believing Christian I have learned down... (show quote)


Is that what you do when your kids misbehave? Run away?

Do you ever tell them what you don't like about what they are doing? Or are you just picking up your ball and going home, a sore loser.

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 23:06:00   #
larry
 
son of witless wrote:
A rising tide lifts all boats. Supply side economics actually works. Obamanomics does not work.

Funny how when you copy European socialism you get European economics. For decades part time work has been growing in Europe. Why? Because Socialism mandates all kinds of things for employers who employe full timers. Part time work is becoming the rule in Obamamerica. Why? Same reason.

Obama has done America a great service. America had to learn the hard way that Socialism doesn't work. Obama is a Bull crapp artiste. He has no idea how to govern. “ buying health insurance is never going to be like buying a song on iTunes, you know it’s just a much more complicated transaction. ” duh!

Now that he has blown up the current system so that it will never be right, your guy is just learning that coming up with something better will be harder than he imagined.
A rising tide lifts all boats. Supply side economi... (show quote)


Well, we know for sure that socialism does not work, Even China has modified their program to be more progressive. (Whatever that means,) To me progressive means going in the wrong direction, making progress hurriedly to destruction.
I am sure someone will have a different definition,

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 23:15:23   #
larry
 
BigMike wrote:
Tea Party mobs? Haven't seen any reporting of that on CNN. I think you're exaggerating.


I cannot understand the animosity toward the people that want to return this government to common sense and parity. It seems that those deriding the Tea Party, are those that fear their strangle hold on sense is loosening. This country does not want a central all controlling meat head committee controlling everything we think and do. I believe our strength as a country lies in the working man and the individual members of common interest. Not in the HoiPoloi of privileged nincompoops.

Some of us were not brain washed in the secular progressive class rooms of the sixties. But we were educated in the pure sensible history and promise of this country. We still want that kind of country. We do not want socialism, communism, Atheism, or evolution. We believe in God, Patriotism, and Charity. Not taxation restriction and distrust. WE need to clear out this conclave of idiots with the next vote.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.