One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
False Flag - San Bernardino, California Swat Action
Page <<first <prev 7 of 20 next> last>>
Dec 5, 2015 16:13:17   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Actually it is your striking self absorption that is so hilarious. You're entertainment value is priceless. What you "expose" on this forum is payne1000, which is anything but truth.


A Google search using "San Bernadino false flag" brings up 900,000 hits. There must be a lot of people who smell a rat in the media's portrayal of this incident.

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 16:18:34   #
zillaorange
 
ok, the gun grab issue aside, what's the purpose of these "red flag" events? who's trying to cover up what ? what is a "black swan" ? this is an open question to anyone discussing this matter. I really hope to get a reply !

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 17:33:02   #
payne1000
 
zillaorange wrote:
ok, the gun grab issue aside, what's the purpose of these "red flag" events? who's trying to cover up what ? what is a "black swan" ? this is an open question to anyone discussing this matter. I really hope to get a reply !


I think you mean "false" flag events.

The San Bernadino false flag shooting has two agendas. To scare the public into accepting gun control legislation and to scare the public into allowing any magnitude of atrocities to be committed against Muslims. This false flag operation, along with the recent false flag operation in Paris may be designed to soften up the public enough to convince them that sending ground troops into Syria is necessary for their security. This tactic worked after 9/11. Are the American people ready to be played for suckers again?

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 17:35:32   #
boomie54
 
zillaorange wrote:
ok, the gun grab issue aside, what's the purpose of these "red flag" events? who's trying to cover up what ? what is a "black swan" ? this is an open question to anyone discussing this matter. I really hope to get a reply !


I think what you mean is a "false flag" event, as opposed to "red flag". On that assumption I will try to answer you, it is when some entity perpetrates an attack on it's own people disguised as some other entity it wants to vilify, usually as an excuse to attack them. In this case, it is the govt. of the US creating a fake attack on it's own citizens by Muslim jihadists in order to get more power to control gun ownership. Gun ownership by the people is the greatest threat to the power of a tyrant so the objective of the event is to vilify guns and frighten the people into supporting banning them. Naturally, if everyone realized what was really happening, the tyrants would be in deep doo doo, hence the cover up. A "black swan" is an event that conventional wisdom has deemed impossible, simply because it hasn't been seen before.
I hope that helps you a little.

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 17:56:01   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
A Google search using "San Bernadino false flag" brings up 900,000 hits. There must be a lot of people who smell a rat in the media's portrayal of this incident.
Google, huh? OK.

The only false flags in existence are you and your paranoid comrades.

The French sure as hell don't see Islamic terrorism as false flags. They are getting down and dirty over there. Ironic, isn't it, that the French would be the ones to launch a roundup of Muslims suspected to have ties to terrorism--about 2000 so far. Must have something to do with real live Jihadists killing over 130 of their people.

Certainly makes all you false flag wavers look really really f*cking stupid. Of course, we don't need the actions of the French to convince us of that.

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 19:04:11   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Google, huh? OK.

The only false flags in existence are you and your paranoid comrades.

The French sure as hell don't see Islamic terrorism as false flags. They are getting down and dirty over there. Ironic, isn't it, that the French would be the ones to launch a roundup of Muslims suspected to have ties to terrorism--about 2000 so far. Must have something to do with real live Jihadists killing over 130 of their people.

Certainly makes all you false flag wavers look really really f*cking stupid. Of course, we don't need the actions of the French to convince us of that.
Google, huh? OK. br br The only false flags in ex... (show quote)


Who cares what you say since you're an admitted Zionist troll?

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 19:24:15   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
payne1000 wrote:
Who cares what you say since you're an admitted Zionist troll?


For those that have not watched the video. And those that want to comment on what is noticed about the time line etc. All the "coincidences".
FALSE FLAG-SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTING!!!

http://youtu.be/MrA9KYuE8y4

Reply
Dec 5, 2015 19:57:16   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Here is a thought. just a thought.
14 dead, 21 injured. How many uninjured?
A company Christmas party.
How many attendees there with Telephones with cameras?
How many people with cameras taking pics of the party?
How many would have taken pics before, during and after the shooting?
The company Christmas parties I have attended always had lots of people taking pics.
Seems to me, this activity would have generated the desire to document the fun and games.
Anyone seen any yet?

eagleye13 wrote:
For those that have not watched the video. And those that want to comment on what is noticed about the time line etc. All the "coincidences".
FALSE FLAG-SAN BERNARDINO SHOOTING!!!

http://youtu.be/MrA9KYuE8y4

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 02:59:30   #
the waker Loc: 11th freest nation
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Google, huh? OK.

The only false flags in existence are you and your paranoid comrades.

The French sure as hell don't see Islamic terrorism as false flags. They are getting down and dirty over there. Ironic, isn't it, that the French would be the ones to launch a roundup of Muslims suspected to have ties to terrorism--about 2000 so far. Must have something to do with real live Jihadists killing over 130 of their people.

Certainly makes all you false flag wavers look really really f*cking stupid. Of course, we don't need the actions of the French to convince us of that.
Google, huh? OK. br br The only false flags in ex... (show quote)


Yes, the French are involved now and soon the rest of the E.U. will be used to help remove Assad, since that's about all our involvement in Syria has been about, as we have done little to ISIS w/ the hand picked targets from this administration.
Interesting also how this attack occurred a week before the Climate change Summit in Paris.
The narrative pushed was they're not afraid to have they're Summit, why should they be, w/ the people still on a curfew.
No protesters allowed in the streets now, so no protest to an up coming "Carbon Tax".

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 04:17:20   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Here is a thought. just a thought.
14 dead, 21 injured. How many uninjured?
A company Christmas party.
How many attendees there with Telephones with cameras?
How many people with cameras taking pics of the party?
How many would have taken pics before, during and after the shooting?
The company Christmas parties I have attended always had lots of people taking pics.
Seems to me, this activity would have generated the desire to document the fun and games.
Anyone seen any yet?
Here is a thought. just a thought. br 14 dead, 21 ... (show quote)
"fun and games"? You sick F*ck. What is it you want to see? There were about 80 people there, you want the blood and gore, pictures of the dead bodies?

If you were at a party and two heavily armed and masked killers burst in and opened fire, would you grab your cell phone or camera and shoot back?

What is it you don't understand about withholding evidence during ongoing investigations of a major crime?



Reply
Dec 6, 2015 07:14:39   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
"fun and games"? You sick F*ck. What is it you want to see? There were about 80 people there, you want the blood and gore, pictures of the dead bodies?

If you were at a party and two heavily armed and masked killers burst in and opened fire, would you grab your cell phone or camera and shoot back?

What is it you don't understand about withholding evidence during ongoing investigations of a major crime?


BR, the photo you've shown appears to be bodies of the alleged perpetrators--not the party-goers.

Reply
 
 
Dec 6, 2015 07:44:58   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
payne1000 wrote:
They got away with OK city. They got away with 9/11. They got away with the London bombings. They got away with Sandy Hook. They got away with the Boston bombings. They got away with Charlie Hebdo. They got away with the Paris attacks.
When you control the mainstream media, it's amazing what you can get away with.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 07:47:33   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
"fun and games"? You sick F*ck. What is it you want to see? There were about 80 people there, you want the blood and gore, pictures of the dead bodies?

If you were at a party and two heavily armed and masked killers burst in and opened fire, would you grab your cell phone or camera and shoot back?

What is it you don't understand about withholding evidence during ongoing investigations of a major crime?


And not one drop of blood.
Interesting.

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 08:44:51   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Hey Blade Runner, you jackass! You missed the whole point. Are you that brain dead?
A whole lot of injured and uninjured Christmas partiers would have been on sight taking pictures, before, (during?) and after the shooting.
No pictures from the attendees so far.
Anyone got a list of those people that were attending the company party?
Those in the room the shooting took place need to be verified and interviewed. Not possible actors.


Blade_Runner wrote:
"fun and games"? You sick F*ck. What is it you want to see? There were about 80 people there, you want the blood and gore, pictures of the dead bodies?

If you were at a party and two heavily armed and masked killers burst in and opened fire, would you grab your cell phone or camera and shoot back?

What is it you don't understand about withholding evidence during ongoing investigations of a major crime?

Reply
Dec 6, 2015 08:51:52   #
bdamage Loc: My Bunker
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Hey Blade Runner, you jackass! You missed the whole point. Are you that brain dead?
A whole lot of injured and uninjured Christmas partiers would have been on sight taking pictures, before, (during?) and after the shooting.
No pictures from the attendees so far.
Anyone got a list of those people that were attending the company party?
Those in the room the shooting took place need to be verified and interviewed. Not possible actors.


This should sum it all up pretty easily eagle.

How naïve are the American sheople?
Naïve enough to believe what their boob-tubes tell them to believe!!!

Dec 5 2015
LITMUS TEST TIME.
http://82.221.129.208/ifyouareinamericayouprobablycantseethise8.html

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 20 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.