One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Are Neocons an Existential Threat?
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Sep 20, 2015 10:19:13   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Payne, There is no need to refute what you post. The evidence is all well established. Your accusations are ludicrous.If you posted evidence that little green men are responsible for the last recession, I would ignore it as well. As long as you post such stupid lies from unreliable sources or interpret everything about Israel, Zionists or Jews in the worst possible scenario, to support your unfounded, racist, absurd, pro terrorist views, there is no need to disprove your posts. They disprove your views all by them selves!!lies
Payne, There is no need to refute what you post. T... (show quote)


:thumbup:

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:28:00   #
payne1000
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Payne, There is no need to refute what you post. The evidence is all well established. Your accusations are ludicrous.If you posted evidence that little green men are responsible for the last recession, I would ignore it as well. As long as you post such stupid lies from unreliable sources or interpret everything about Israel, Zionists or Jews in the worst possible scenario, to support your unfounded, racist, absurd, pro terrorist views, there is no need to disprove your posts. They disprove your views all by them selves!!lies
Payne, There is no need to refute what you post. T... (show quote)


As long as you claim the evidence is lies without showing any proof that it is, you are admitting that the evidence cannot be refuted.

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:28:58   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Think what you want. I don't care!
payne1000 wrote:
As long as you claim the evidence is lies without showing any proof that it is, you are admitting that the evidence cannot be refuted.

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:34:15   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Think what you want. I don't care!


I may be mistaken but wasn't it Payne who has put up the "articles" claiming the holicost didn't happen and that millions of Jews weren't murdered by the Nazis?

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:45:22   #
payne1000
 
no propaganda please wrote:
I may be mistaken but wasn't it Payne who has put up the "articles" claiming the holicost didn't happen and that millions of Jews weren't murdered by the Nazis?


I never claimed the "Holocaust" never happened.
I just question if it happened the way the Zionists claim it did.
Zionists are notorious liars who have extorted millions from European countries with their lies. http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world/jewish-world-news/germany-agrees-to-300-million-more-in-restitution-to-jews-claims-conference-says-1.450027

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:47:08   #
payne1000
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Think what you want. I don't care!


That indicates you know the evidence is rock solid.

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:51:18   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Payne, There is no need to refute what you post. The evidence is all well established. Your accusations are ludicrous.If you posted evidence that little green men are responsible for the last recession, I would ignore it as well. As long as you post such stupid lies from unreliable sources or interpret everything about Israel, Zionists or Jews in the worst possible scenario, to support your unfounded, racist, absurd, pro terrorist views, there is no need to disprove your posts. They disprove your views all by them selves!!lies
Payne, There is no need to refute what you post. T... (show quote)


thanks!well said!

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 10:53:48   #
J Anthony Loc: Connecticut
 
Well Payne, it seems you are not being taken seriously enough here. Try equating the neocons with the neolibs, as their actions and policies hae become synonymous. Just my 2 cents

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 11:20:22   #
payne1000
 
reconreb wrote:
thanks!well said!


Another Zionist or Zionist sympathizer who cannot refute the evidence against Israel's complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 11:23:04   #
payne1000
 
J Anthony wrote:
Well Payne, it seems you are not being taken seriously enough here. Try equating the neocons with the neolibs, as their actions and policies hae become synonymous. Just my 2 cents


Zionists fund both political parties so what you say makes sense.
The parties have both been subverted by Zionist money--much of which was given to them from U.S. taxpayers in the form of foreign aid.

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 12:06:28   #
son of witless
 
payne1000 wrote:
Silverstein controlled access to all three towers which were blown up on 9/11. Before Silverstein, the towers were controlled by Zionists who ran the NYC Port Authority. The explosives were planted in the Towers during Silverstein or the Port Authority's control of access. The fact that Silverstein tried to collect twice on insurance demonstrates how greedy Silverstein is.
The fact that Silverstein and his son and daughter did not show up to work in the towers on 9/11 indicates they either knew or were warned the buildings were to be exploded that day.
Silverstein controlled access to all three towers ... (show quote)


The trying to collect twice on the insurance is a business decision. Seeing how all liberals are anti capitalist I don't know why screwing an insurance company is objectionable to you. As far as Silverstein and his family being absent during the event, what evidence do you have it wasn't luck? Keeping the event secret was essential to the success of the terrorists. There is no way letting it out so a few could not be there would not have resulted in failure.

I have to check on more stuff before I get back to you but, what is this about explosives in the towers?

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 13:16:12   #
payne1000
 
son of witless wrote:
The trying to collect twice on the insurance is a business decision. Seeing how all liberals are anti capitalist I don't know why screwing an insurance company is objectionable to you. As far as Silverstein and his family being absent during the event, what evidence do you have it wasn't luck? Keeping the event secret was essential to the success of the terrorists. There is no way letting it out so a few could not be there would not have resulted in failure.

I have to check on more stuff before I get back to you but, what is this about explosives in the towers?
The trying to collect twice on the insurance is a ... (show quote)


If your sense of morals allows you to excuse someone who attempts to profit excessively from a massive murder operation, then it will be difficult for me to have a conversation with you. My mind doesn't work that way.

You're kidding about not knowing the buildings were controlled demolitions, right?

This building in Madrid, consumed in flames, burned for over 20 hours and remained standing.
This building in Madrid, consumed in flames, burne...

This building, which burned only at the top, is being brought down by powerful explosives at almost free-fall speed.
This building, which burned only at the top, is be...

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 15:01:55   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
payne1000 wrote:
If your sense of morals allows you to excuse someone who attempts to profit excessively from a massive murder operation, then it will be difficult for me to have a conversation with you. My mind doesn't work that way.

You're kidding about not knowing the buildings were controlled demolitions, right?


:lol:



Reply
Sep 20, 2015 16:25:58   #
payne1000
 
Bad Bob wrote:
:lol:


What's the matter BB?
Are you unable to express yourself with words?

Reply
Sep 20, 2015 16:31:36   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
payne1000 wrote:
What's the matter BB?
Are you unable to express yourself with words?


All I can do is laugh at your crazy ass. :lol:



Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.