Comment Loc: California

Wow! How many dicks did he have?

Grugore

I was simply stating what's in the Bible. How does that make me a bad Christian? The Bible specifically says that homosexuals are an abomination to God. They will burn in Hell. It's a certainty, unless they repent and ask forgiveness.

Anigav6969

I know the bible is against people judging...are you saying you've never done that? A sin is a sin...so you're as bad as any homosexual....and these are your beliefs, they are not facts....most people in the world disagree with your beliefs..

Hell is relative....what would be hell for you ? Mine is listening to a bunch of old farts arguing that my fairy tale is better than your fairy tail....imagine that for eternity ! Now that's scary

larry

What legal rights are excluded now? Only the IRS tax discount for married couples, but to inherit property, all they need is a will to legally take that over. They can own property jointly, land , houses, cars, etc. What is the big deal already? I don't see any advantage in calling their union marriage, If there is one, what is it?

larry

If you do not believe in a future life, Hell is irrelevant. Just as a future life is irrelevant if you do not believe it. But why should there be this obfuscation about a term for cohabitation. If they would stop using the term marriage, there would probably be no concern at all. As far a hell is concerned, if you believe in heaven, you probably believe in hell. It needs to balance out.

larry

You are mistaken, it was declared in Genesis. Moses' time, which makes it sort of a baseline arrangement for procreation and harmony in civilization. However, in the beginning there was not much choice for selection of a man and a wife. So they were picking each other out of the same family. ??? What does that mean?

Anigav6969

The IRS tax discount is their right as a married couple......this is a done deal...you're gonna have to get past this

Anigav6969

Gay people getting married has no effect on you whatsoever....as for heaven/hell....I just don't think about that stuff....believe as you wish

larry

I don't care of they get a discount, that is not the point, but two people joining up just to get it is ludicrous. It does not amount to that much they would probably get along better by filing separately and listing all their deductions for each separately. Listing their income together puts them in a higher bracket. Not a reasonable gain, unless one of them does not work at all. What then is their point?

Anigav6969

The point is, they may want to get married.....what do you care ?.......who gives a crap ?.....let them be miserable like most other married people

fredlott63

When God ordained families disappear from the American conscience this country will perish.

no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun

It was child abuse when he molested his daughter, but they are now both adults so, using the logic of the left, they MUST be permitted a marriage license

The problems with the concept of "gay marriage" are well expressed in this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFhUyuPIceY

larry

yes it does affect me, and you also. The effect is that they do not add to the population pool of new individuals. They are like a wart on society, Sure we can tolerate them, but they have no skin in the game of a functional society. They do not add to the work force by contributing functional new people.
They want a free ride on your back. They have no intention of adding to the gene pool or the basic concepts of society. It is not only their loss, but yours as well.

larry

At the time of Sodom and Gomorrah, the homosexuals had congregated into the two isolated conclaves. They were separated from normal society. They did not interfere with the other viewpoint of sexual behavior. Maybe if they were concentrated again, they could live in harmony with themselves and not bother the majority of people that find that behavior repugnant. It would not bother me if they all got together and started their own society, instead of free loading on the (what is considered) normal society. Normal people did not interfere with them and they were happy as clams doing their thing. Why not separate now as before ? It is the infusion and diffusion of the practice that is causing all the trouble. How about separate neighborhoods for such as these, SF comes to mind as a start.

larry

The problem with negating the traditional concept of marriage between a man and a woman, is that the basic concept of a nurturing family is destroyed. Men and Women have different natural concepts of life based on their ability to adjust to harmony in a society. Whenever we see one sex dominating the society, we find abuse and distortion. The harmony of the family requires a blending of these viewpoints for love to blossom. Two people of the same bent, are not a complete entity in that they are of a singular viewpoint. Essentially "one eyed people" They cannot see the expanded dimension of full vision. They are fooled into thinking they can, but it is impossible. What this would and will lead too, is disregard for the viewpoint of the other sex. It is too one sided, honoring the arrangement of one sided family groups is similar to the military in that they are unable to recognize the full potential of disparity. They can do one thing well, but not good enough for harmony.

filial love is not the same as sacrificial love which is required by opposite sexual unions for harmony and progress. It is really just lust. And has no redeeming societal value.