How the "Holocaust" was faked (Page 26): Perhaps???????

Loki Loc: Georgia

Spankem wrote:

You're right Rufus, you don't need the credit, and you should take pride in the student who perhaps exceeds the teacher.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :lol:

Perhaps???????

Loki Loc: Georgia

emarine wrote:

I completely understand your position.... I have always been curious How Hitler manipulated the German people to the point of the final solution... I feel confident in my decision of standing with American Jews to prevent this from ever happening again ... the putz is just another learning experience or a bump in a very long road to understanding...

I believe I would hang with a Sabra. Many American Jews have the same faith in government that led to their disarmament, persecution and murder in the 1940s. Israelis are realistic.

Al-ien

GrampaG wrote:

How does one discuss something intelligently, as you say, when the one presenting the argument is a complete moron. You don't need polite discussion; you need help, man. I suggest you check yourself in to the nearest hospital for the criminally insane! They've got drugs that might help!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Well said GrampaG. Where do these weirdo's come from?

9th Marines

alabuck wrote:

--------- br Son, br 1st-I was just kidding! br 2n... (show quote)

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

emarine wrote:

I completely understand your position.... I have always been curious How Hitler manipulated the German people to the point of the final solution... I feel confident in my decision of standing with American Jews to prevent this from ever happening again ... the putz is just another learning experience or a bump in a very long road to understanding...

I'll give you a brief synopsis on how that happened.

The Germans of the 1930s were a different breed of people, they took great pride in their nation's military prowess and were quite amenable to an overbearing government system--a democratic one, but powerful none the less. The German defeat in WW1 truly distressed them, and the Treaty of Versailles was crafted to humble them. This was a deep insult to a proud people. The war also left the nation's economy in a shambles. And, as you know, along came the Great Depression (wasn't just an American thing). During this time, Germans were so destitute that they were burning Billion Mark notes in their stoves to stay warm and cook a potato. The Weimar Republic under von Hindenburg was impotent.

Then, up steps former Gefreiter Adolph Hitler. A consummate politician with a major bone to pick who practiced his histrionics in front of a mirror. His message and his delivery were brilliant. He appealed directly to that German pride, blaming the nation's defeat on the Weimar Republic and its democratic form of government. "Stabbed in the back" was his opening theme. Leaving his hatred of the untermensch Jews, Gypsies and what have you out for now, Hitler proceeded to convince the Germans that Germany must once again prove it's place on the world stage. And he did this with policies and programs that sent their economy through the roof. Even though he directed German industry and business toward his military goals, the Germans were working again, money was flowing, life was good.

Then, in one of the most diabolically brilliant moves, Hitler shredded the Treaty of Versailles, thumbed the collective German nose in the face of the allied victors. It was a given then that the people were bought. Hindenburg stepped aside, Hitler took over, the German people had their savior, and it was all down hill from there.

Simple as I can make it, but it does have a familiar ring to it nowadays.

P.S. payne1000 is a reincarnation of an SS officer. Those bastards were fanatics. Maybe we should call payne1000 Herr Obersturmbannführer. Or, "Herr Oberst", for short.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

alabuck wrote:

--------- br Son, br 1st-I was just kidding! br 2n... (show quote)

Er...how does one join the Mickey Mouse party? That doesn't sound so bad! :lol:

son of witless

Blade_Runner wrote:

I'll give you a brief synopsis on how that happened.

The Germans of the 1930s were a different breed of people, they took great pride in their nation's military prowess and were quite amenable to an overbearing government system--a democratic one, but powerful none the less. The German defeat in WW1 truly distressed them, and the Treaty of Versailles was crafted to humble them. This was a deep insult to a proud people. The war also left the nation's economy in a shambles. And, as you know, along came the Great Depression (wasn't just an American thing). During this time, Germans were so destitute that they were burning Billion Mark notes in their stoves to stay warm and cook a potato. The Weimar Republic under von Hindenburg was impotent.

Then, up steps former Gefreiter Adolph Hitler. A consummate politician with a major bone to pick who practiced his histrionics in front of a mirror. His message and his delivery were brilliant. He appealed directly to that German pride, blaming the nation's defeat on the Weimar Republic and its democratic form of government. "Stabbed in the back" was his opening theme. Leaving his hatred of the untermensch Jews, Gypsies and what have you out for now, Hitler proceeded to convince the Germans that Germany must once again prove it's place on the world stage. And he did this with policies and programs that sent their economy through the roof. Even though he directed German industry and business toward his military goals, the Germans were working again, money was flowing, life was good.

Then, in one of the most diabolically brilliant moves, Hitler shredded the Treaty of Versailles, thumbed the collective German nose in the face of the allied victors. It was a given then that the people were bought. Hindenburg stepped aside, Hitler took over, the German people had their savior, and it was all down hill from there.

Simple as I can make it, but it does have a familiar ring to it nowadays.

P.S. payne1000 is a reincarnation of an SS officer. Those bastards were fanatics. Maybe we should call payne1000 Herr Obersturmbannführer. Or, "Herr Oberst", for short.

I'll give you a brief synopsis on how that happene... (show quote)

You cannot leave out the European Appeasers. From 1933 to 1937 Germany was weak enough for England and France to have shown Hitler the door. The legal justification could have been found easily. Chamberlin was the Barak Obama of the 1930s.

Weakness and appeasement get millions killed. I wonder how far history will repeat itself this time around. Instead of Germany, Italy and Japan you have Russia, ISIS, and Iran.

Spankem Loc: NJ

Rufus wrote:

Ouch. :roll:

That was a compliment.

Spankem Loc: NJ

Loki wrote:

Perhaps???????

I read that and noticed the finger, that's funny
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

I see that you don't know the meaning of Hasbarat.

Those who defend Zionism and Israel are hasbarats.

Have you noticed me defending Israel and Zionism?

The only thing you defend is stupidity!

payne1000

alabuck wrote:

--------------
It looks like the external skin (bricks, fascia and glass) falling/peeling away while the internal floors are falling straight downward. Note that there is no "lean" or "list" to the building.

You're really showing your ignorance (or deliberate mendacity) here.
The towers contained no brick. What is show being propelled hundreds of feet outward from the center is pulverized concrete from the floors, fragmented people and hundreds of tons of fragmented steel columns.

The top section of the South Tower did "lean" when the explosions started.
The top would have toppled off if the explosions had not disintegrated that section along with the 78 floors beneath.

payne1000

PoppaGringo wrote:

To each his own amusement. I find him disgusting to say the least. If you find him 'entertaining', that is your prerogative. As for myself, I am through with this thread.

I'll try to miss you.

payne1000

alabuck wrote:

---------

You're right, Poppa. We shoulda never responded and just let him die on the vine. Too late now, though. Of course, he's not refuted anything I've posted. He can't argue with the facts. All he can do is ignore them; just like he was trained to do. 3 pieces of fish and he'll honk those bicycle horns all day for you. He'll clap his flippers, too.

For the record, I've refuted every rebuttal reply you've attempted.

payne1000

Spankem wrote:

He hasn't refuted anything anyone posted here, cause he can't, he produced nothing but conjecture against the evidence of many thousands of eye witnesses, then he claims he hasn't seen or spoken to the eyewitnesses the world has.

Poppa's right, don't respond to him, just talk around him, as if he ain't here, mentally he isn't.

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

You're really showing your ignorance (or deliberate mendacity) here.
The towers contained no brick. What is show being propelled hundreds of feet outward from the center is pulverized concrete from the floors, fragmented people and hundreds of tons of fragmented steel columns.

The top section of the South Tower did "lean" when the explosions started.
The top would have toppled off if the explosions had not disintegrated that section along with the 78 floors beneath.

Where are those test results...Hasbarat??? Colossal stupidity on display here folks...this guy should be institutionalized. With thinking like this, this senile old man is a danger to himself and society.