How the "Holocaust" was faked (Page 20): Absolute idiot! Please show me the test results from flying a jet airliner, full of fuel, into buildings built to same specifications as the...

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

What about WTC7?
Were you oblivious to WTC7?
You know, the one a BBC reporter announced had collapsed while the building was visible behind her. It fell 20 minutes later.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s0qdLoobkUI

Absolute idiot! Please show me the test results from flying a jet airliner, full of fuel, into buildings built to same specifications as the world trade center(s)...and, with similar buildings like WTC7 nearby. I'm waiting...tick...tock...

You pull more crap out of your ass than anybody I know.

payne1000

JMHO wrote:

God, are you a blithering idiot!!!!!! An absolute MORON!!!!!! I have met some dumb people in my life, but you, pal are about the dumbest...a pathetic POS.

Insults without rebuttal is the MO of a hasbarat. But I already knew you are a hasbarat.

Loki Loc: Georgia

payne1000 wrote:

Have you noticed that no one so far even attempts to refute the article posted?

There is nothing to refute. There are only baseless claims with no evidence.

ajj100 Loc: Earth

Your brain dead. I didn't say any such thing! All the jews did not die in the Holocaust. Don't so be ignorant.

GrampaG wrote:

So based on your warped logic, the only viable proof would be that ALL Jews were exterminated, and none managed to survive? The longer you persist in this nonsense, the more ridiculous you make yourself sound.

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

Insults without rebuttal is the MO of a hasbarat. But I already knew you are a hasbarat.

That's all you've got, pal...a PhotoShop image...that's it...no sense...no brains...no original thought...just a moronic image...as phony as you.

I'm still waiting for those test results...tick...tock....

payne1000

JMHO wrote:

Absolute idiot! Please show me the test results from flying a jet airliner, full of fuel, into buildings built to same specifications as the world trade center(s)...and, with similar buildings like WTC7 nearby. I'm waiting...tick...tock...

You pull more crap out of your ass than anybody I know.

You don't comment on how BBC knew WTC7 was going to fall 20 minutes before it fell.

This is the extent of the damage WTC7 suffered from the fall of the North Tower. Would this minor damage cause the 47-story skyscraper to fall at free-fall speed?

Loki Loc: Georgia

cesspool jones wrote:

How much you wanna bet...pain has a phd

Piled higher and Deeper. I can think of one other PhD on this forum with similar credentials.

JMHO Loc: Utah

payne1000 wrote:

You don't comment on how BBC knew WTC7 was going to fall 20 minutes before it fell.

Prove it asshole! Where is the actual proof???? I see opinion, conjecture, and just plain bullshit...but, no proof! Now, where are those test results?

badbobby Loc: texas

slatten49 wrote:

Quite frankly, your post not only rebutts itself but is not taken seriously by knowledgeable, rational, or sane people. :roll:

I'm not noted for rationality
so I will make this statement
I think the jerk(payne)should definitely be taken seriously
he and his like don't belong in our countRy
SEND HIM TO IRAN
AND LET THEM KNOW HE IS COMING

Loki Loc: Georgia

payne1000 wrote:

Why then, don't you offer a valid rebuttal?

Quite possibly because you have not offered a valid statement. An article making a number of baseless, unproven claims is not valid. The article presents no corroborating evidence, merely the opinion of the author.

payne1000

Loki wrote:

There is nothing to refute. There are only baseless claims with no evidence.

It's obvious you went to hasbarat school. That's the standard hasbarat answer when confronted with facts you cannot refute.

JMHO Loc: Utah

Loki wrote:

Quite possibly because you have not offered a valid statement. An article making a number of baseless, unproven claims is not valid. The article presents no corroborating evidence, merely the opinion of the author.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

amadeus

You need help !!!!!!! of depraved mind . It is not to late for you there are places who will help you even pro bono.

payne1000

Loki wrote:

Quite possibly because you have not offered a valid statement. An article making a number of baseless, unproven claims is not valid. The article presents no corroborating evidence, merely the opinion of the author.

The author offers common sense in explaining many reasons why the Germans would not intentionally kill their labor force.

If his common sense opinions are not valid, why can't you refute them?

Loki Loc: Georgia

payne1000 wrote:

It is amazing how many commenting here know someone who was there.
Instead of making up shit, why don't you try to refute the logic which the article presents?

Opinion is not a synonym for logic. The article is merely a poorly presented outpouring of propaganda, offering not one shred of proof. The only person making shit up, motherf*cker, is you.