-------------
Your lack of knowledge about which you expound hasn't ceased to amaze me. You say it takes over 7 hours to cremate a body. That's WRONG! Even if you begin with a cold oven, it takes 2 to 2-½ hours to cremate a human body at 1,400-1,800 F. The "rule of thumb" is: 1 hour for every 100 pounds of body weight. Once the oven has warmed, the time drops to about 30 to 45 minutes per 100 pounds of body-weight. Now, re-figure the time and number of bodies cremated. I've just saved you a BUNCH of time.

Once the body was consumed, it's ashes fell below the grating it had been placed on. From there, the ashes were scrapped into a pail while another body was pushed in on top. German efficiency at its best! After the ashes cooled, they were sent to another oven for further burning or to a grinder where the left-over bone fragments were pulverized into powder. Then, off to the ash-pond for disposal. Also, coke was used as the fuel; not gasoline, oil or natural gas.

What's even more amazing is that a simple "Google" of the subject can bring you a wealth of info that proves you wrong. Maybe you should hone your computer skills. Or, are you required to "play the fool" by your handler?

I don't know where you get your info, but it's failed you terribly.

You're quoting modern day cremation times with modern day equipment.
Gas and propane is used today. Gas and propane require no fuel loading and little time is required to heat to cremation temperatures.

Do you have any idea how much coke would have to be manufactured and transported to the camps to cremate even a million people? How much fuel would it take to manufacture the coke? How many personnel would be needed to move and unload enough coke to cremate even a million people? Remember, Germany was short on fighting men and short on fuel. They were also depending on Jewish labor for their war industries. Why would they kill the only laborers they had? Maybe you should hone your thinking skills.

----------
You're partially right, carpenter patriot. Imagine a bunk bed that is 150 beds tall. Each mattress is supported and held in place by the lip of each mattresses' bed-rails. The inward-angling lip of the mattress frame is taking on the roll of the "angle clips" used in building the WTC to support each of its floors. The mattresses will represent the floor(s). The 4 corner posts of each bunk bed simply hold the bed rails in place.

Now, suppose there's a fire in bed 100 (from the bottom). As the temperature from the flames rise and the flames grow closer to the corner posts and bed frame, the metal bed frames and the bed posts begin to bow/bend outward and downward, away from the mattress. The weight of the 50 upper beds act to add pressure on the heated bed frames and the corner posts, causing even more bending/bowing.

Eventually, the bending/bowing of the bed frame extends so far as to allow the mattress to slip through the space between the bed frames holding up the mattress. The mattress falls through, onto the bed below. With the burning mattress no longer in place, acting as an outward force against the bed rails and corner posts, the bed frame and posts fall inward, toward the inside of the bed structure. This occurs because the heated metal is weakest near the flames and strongest near the top. As such, the outward bowing would occur closer to the bottom of the mattress; allowing it to slip from place.

The "action" here is the weakened posts and rails have bowed OUTWARD & DOWNWARD at the bottom. The "reaction" is that the unheated portions of the rails and posts, close to the bed above, are now INSIDE the vertical line that used to exist between the top and bottom of the posts and frames. They are now off-center and the posts and frames are further apart at the bottom. Hence the mattress slipping through and falling onto the bed below it.

The beds above, without the vertical support of the bed that caught fire and collapsed, now lose their support and collapse into the space that the burning bed had occupied. As each bed above falls, its force and inertia causes a chain-reaction of the beds above to collapse on top of each other; in a sort of domino effect. The weight and rate of fall of each bed and frame, above the bed that caught fire, simply adds to the mass and energy being dropped on each subsequent bed below.

This "collapse-characteristic" was designed into the WTC by using the modular design. Without any overpowering outside forces (even the airliner(s) hitting the building(s) wasn't enough to force an outward fall of the building), the building would collapse inward.

My apologies if I'm still not making myself clear. If I'm not, let me know and I'll try a different analogy.