WHY ARE LIBERALS SO ADVERSE TO THE TRUTH?
Jun 18, 2015 20:39:03 #
wuzblynd
Loc: thomson georgia
righty wrote:
WHY ARE LIBERALS SO ADVERSE TO THE TRUTH?
I have the only explainable answer for that so follow along.
1. none of them have balls, they all have vee-vees
2. when they walk their vee-vee lips rub together
3. that causes friction
4. friction causes heat
5. heat rises
6. heat kills brain cells.
BINGO theres your asnwer
I have the only explainable answer for that so follow along.
1. none of them have balls, they all have vee-vees
2. when they walk their vee-vee lips rub together
3. that causes friction
4. friction causes heat
5. heat rises
6. heat kills brain cells.
BINGO theres your asnwer
:thumbup:
Jun 18, 2015 22:09:37 #
bdamage wrote:
And the good old Delta Smelt. Hope Mexifornia likes that one!!
Jun 18, 2015 23:47:59 #
atc333 wrote:
Rather than go on a rant, why not read on the topi... (show quote)
I agree, what's all this ranting about. We can settle this quickly and easily. Now, if you would just publish a link or links that will lead some of us skeptical engineers and scientists out here to;
The methods of collection
The collation procedures and protocols.
Calibration procedures and protocols
Test system redundancy and cross correlation procedures
The independent test criteria for ocean, land, air and ice.
This historic data for these mediums
Frequency and protocols for simultaneous collections at multiple sites using the same test criteria on each.
Results of testing through at least one sun cycle.
Frequency of testing to the same criteria for extended periods.
Data produced from all such tests.
Realtime baseline data.
Historic comparative data
Historic baseline data
This is only the tip of the ice berg (oh, pardon me) but it's a start.
If you can direct us I and many others would appreciate it. I have searched the internet and find no definitive, hard data published. And please no NASA or NOAA crap...we've seen all that conjecture.
I do find thousands of simple minded pages like the ones you link to above that essentially say "man made global warming is real and anyone who does not believe it is stupid"...based on computer models for which we have not access to data, the word of the government, Al Gore and now the Pope in his cute little beanie...(wonder if you can get those in the Vatican gift shop)
Excuse me if my trust of government seems to be in the shitter...
Jun 19, 2015 04:49:16 #
Haughty Lib wrote:
The climate change were experiencing now does have human causation according to 99% of qualified inbiased scientific experts.
Even if you were to suppose that as much as 25% of them were biased or incompetent, which is HIGHLY unlikely, we'd still be left with 74% consensus.
Human causation of climate,change is real. Period, and you'd have to be a wacky and unintelligent freak to believe otherwise.
Even if you were to suppose that as much as 25% of them were biased or incompetent, which is HIGHLY unlikely, we'd still be left with 74% consensus.
Human causation of climate,change is real. Period, and you'd have to be a wacky and unintelligent freak to believe otherwise.
Go back and play your video games and wait for your welfare check. No one cares about your idiot statements and repeats of leftist dogma! We are well aware that EVERYTHING coming from the Liberal Left is just more lies!
Jun 19, 2015 06:00:13 #
"Why are Liberals so adverse to Truth? Because they can't handle the truth.....that's why? It interferes with their pride and to do as they please. No matter who is hurt by their actions. Their consciences are seared shut and they will go to their graves believing they did the right thing.
Jun 19, 2015 08:42:02 #
Jun 19, 2015 10:03:27 #
CDM wrote:
I agree, what's all this ranting about. We can se... (show quote)
Also the source of your grants, and the conditions attached! Grants conditioned on "Proving Global Warming" automatically disprove your data and put it into the catagory of PROPAGANDA! Again...follow the money!
Jun 19, 2015 10:08:30 #
hnealc wrote:
Mission? Impossible!! :D
Yup. Afraid so... While it may be true that the Meek Shall Inherit the Earth...it is absolutely true that the Stupid Shall Inherit the Shit...They will get what they ask for...
Jun 19, 2015 10:12:10 #
astrolite wrote:
Also the source of your grants, and the conditions attached! Grants conditioned on "Proving Global Warming" automatically disprove your data and put it into the catagory of PROPAGANDA! Again...follow the money!
Ph.D's exist for only one reason...get paid to write papers...Follow the money is the entire argument.
I also contend that the Catholic Church and the Pope have been bought and sold...There is no other explanation for the man to promote a concept that will bring the wrath of hell down on the already downtrodden...
Jun 19, 2015 10:14:58 #
CDM wrote:
Ph.D's exist for only one reason...get paid to write papers...Follow the money is the entire argument.
I also contend that the Catholic Church and the Pope have been bought and sold...There is no other explanation for the man to promote a concept that will bring the wrath of hell down on the already downtrodden...
I also contend that the Catholic Church and the Pope have been bought and sold...There is no other explanation for the man to promote a concept that will bring the wrath of hell down on the already downtrodden...
Right! I'm sure somewhere there is a condition where the Catholic Church (or at least the Vatican) will profit from global warming propaganda!
Jun 19, 2015 12:11:19 #
Jun 19, 2015 12:28:22 #
astrolite wrote:
Also the source of your grants, and the conditions attached! Grants conditioned on "Proving Global Warming" automatically disprove your data and put it into the catagory of PROPAGANDA! Again...follow the money!
astrolite: As someone said: "grant money has a way of buying what it wants..."
Jun 19, 2015 13:05:48 #
Yankee, he is accurate; it's 99% of the scientists who have been paid off...He simply forgot the qualifier...
Jun 19, 2015 14:44:43 #
CDM wrote:
Yankee, he is accurate; it's 99% of the scientists who have been paid off...He simply forgot the qualifier...
I just can't believe those numbers. Sounds like they corrupted or bought off an inordinate percentage of what seemed to be honest scientist. That's kind of like all those Cleveland precincts that cast not one vote for Romney, statistically impossible.
Jun 19, 2015 23:36:24 #
CDM wrote:
Yankee, he is accurate; it's 99% of the scientists who have been paid off...He simply forgot the qualifier...
Actually it went like this: The UN wackos got together about 93 of their PAID so-called scientists! But when THEY were polled....only 73% of THEM agreed !!!! That means 27% of those PAID to support Global warming-climate change, refused to endorse the report! Panic!!!! So the propagandists decided to claim "73% of ALL scientists agree that global warming is destroying earth" That comes under the adage: Figures don't lie....but, liars do figure! (and ALL liberals, ALWAYS LIE) Next they intend debating "the meaning of "IS" ????
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.