The Alleged 'Defenders Of Christianity' and Patriotic Lovers Of America' are in reality just the opposite! Time and again we have watched these champions of “family values” exposed as hypocrites and frauds, with addictions to porn, even to child porn, to prostitutes, same and opposite sex, to mistresses on the side (sometimes in other countries), not to mention corruption – from Michele Bachmann to Rick Perry to Chris Christie to Jeb Bush – all presidential hopefuls who have more claim to a cell than to the Oval Office. The varied and repeated displays of immorality by Republican candidates, however egregious, hardly compares to their view of women as nothing more than fertile chattel, who, amusingly, think they’re actual people.

Not only do Republicans ignore biblical injunctions against their own behavior, but civil injunctions as well, even those set firmly in the United State Constitution. Somehow, everybody is guilty but them. If they are caught, they are not guilty, but persecuted. Victims of witch hunts, like those poor Duggars.

Nearly twenty centuries of destroying every alternative to itself under its belt, and even while they try to strip rights from women, gays, lesbians, and transgenders, to listen to these self-appointed representatives of the world’s largest religion, they are the ones being persecuted. Shameful! http://www.politicususa.com/2015/06/06/reject-absolute-moral-corruption-republican-cult.html :twisted:

Your article is just a bunch of ignorant hatred. Not only that but, it spews an incorrect dialog born of the ignorant hatred. Youyr article mention the Dugger kid as a molester but, to be a molestor, you have to be an adult. The Dugger kid was only 14 when he did what he did. Of course news such as Huffington Post conveniently left out his age. Not only that but, you pretend like there is a war on women by republicans when the only thing about "women's rights" that republicans oppose is abortion. You act like democrats are saints when it's the democrats who scream racism all while waging a war on blacks. I don't know why I'm even deigning to respond to such crap. Republicans and democrats probably have equal numbers of pedophiles in their ranks. The only difference is that the democrat's pedophiles(like Jerry Epstein)boast about their pedophilia and act like it's a normal thing. I guess they're just using the LGBT playbook, and why not? It worked pretty well for gays.

Your article is just a bunch of ignorant hatred. Not only that but, it spews an incorrect dialog born of the ignorant hatred. Youyr article mention the Dugger kid as a molester but, to be a molestor, you have to be an adult. The Dugger kid was only 14 when he did what he did. Of course news such as Huffington Post conveniently left out his age. Not only that but, you pretend like there is a war on women by republicans when the only thing about "women's rights" that republicans oppose is abortion. You act like democrats are saints when it's the democrats who scream racism all while waging a war on blacks. I don't know why I'm even deigning to respond to such crap. Republicans and democrats probably have equal numbers of pedophiles in their ranks. The only difference is that the democrat's pedophiles(like Jerry Epstein)boast about their pedophilia and act like it's a normal thing. I guess they're just using the LGBT playbook, and why not? It worked pretty well for gays.

Ya. Rubio is called down for spending money he has earned by his book. The low life left is attempting to to smear the right and hopefully fool the useful idiots into refocusing away from the actual thieves in government. Pathetic child like finger wagging.
Like this N Y Times article.
Note the calling out on his accepting monies from Norman Braman for employing him and not calling it what it is, a salary. DIPSHITS !!!!!!


The only people who accept this yellow journalism are those who fish for half or tainted facts skewed to meet their emotionally fueled naval gazing ideals.


The New York Times earned itself some Twitter mockery last week when it ran a piece about Senator and 2016 candidate Marco Rubio’s (R-FL) dozen-odd parking tickets, info the Times swears it got on its own but which critics maintain it repurposed from a Democratic oppo research firm.

Tuesday morning the Gray Lady ran a second feature, this one a more expansive probe on Rubio’s finances, from his students loans to his purchase of a speedboat to his less-than-successful real estate hobby. Here, have a block quote:

Among the serious contenders for the presidency, Mr. Rubio stands out for his youth, his meteoric political rise — and for the persistent doubts about his financial management, to the point that Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign flagged the issue when vetting Mr. Rubio as a possible running mate in 2012, interviews show.

…A review of the Rubio family’s finances — including many new documents — reveals a series of decisions over the past 15 years that experts called imprudent: significant debts; a penchant to spend heavily on luxury items like the boat and the lease of a $50,000 2015 Audi Q7; a strikingly low savings rate, even when Mr. Rubio was earning large sums; and inattentive accounting that led to years of unpaid local government fees.

…But as Mr. Rubio, 44, seeks to counter questions about his stature and readiness for the presidency, his financial history creates particular complications. It has made him unusually reliant on a campaign donor, Norman Braman, a billionaire who subsidized Mr. Rubio’s job as a college instructor, hired him as lawyer and continues to employ his wife.

And it could undermine Mr. Rubio’s well-crafted political persona: The senator has long portrayed himself as a champion of financial austerity, railing against excessive government spending and runaway debt.