Bad Bob wrote:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Bad Bob, WOW, this is a "Howard Stern" not funny guy.
Alex Jones (I think that's his last name) has no credibility. He's just one loud mouth.
All these conspiracy theories. Some have "some" truth.
I talked about September 11 yesterday with my son as we were walking with grandson and my grandson's sister, a pit whose name is Nina - so my son tells me that there was absolutely no damage whatsoever at the Pentagon. Nothing so large that would indicate a
plane had damaged any part of the building.
I checked this Alex whatever's credentials. Good thing to do. So he's a "shock jock". Hmmmm...not a great source of real NEWS.
Yes, all manner of secrecy going on, and has been since the 1950's - McCarthy and HUAC (House of Unamerican Committee - dedicated to rooting out all
"Communists" all over the USA). That wasn't secret,
but it was an American shame.
People lost their livelihoods because of HUAC. The only amusing thing that happened (for those of you who don't know, the procedure happened like this: anyone the Committee wanted was brought before HUAC, and was asked, and this is a quote: "Have you now or have you ever been, a member of the Communist party"?)
And, people who copped to it, then ratted their "friends" who then suffered loss of livelihood. The amusing thing is that when Zero Mostel was brought before the Committee (and for this you need to understand that many on trial said - "I plead the 5th"),
and Zero Mostel looked at the witch-hunters and
wiggled 5 fingers of one hand, and left the box.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the Communist
party being a wonderful thing. This has to do with the
USA using techniques over the last 70 years to hunt down those they thought were "enemies". Such
civilized behavior, right? NO.
What galls me is that years after Dublya (rather,
the tragedy which was Cheney, and Rumsfeld) that
Rumsfeld stated that he'd always been against going into Iraq. Hypo-fuckin-crit. Cheney really is a tragic
figure.
And then we talked about JFK. There is no doubt that the C.I.A. was involved in JFK's murder. And, possibly
Lyndon Johnson. I mean, come on, Jack Ruby shoots
Lee Harvey Oswald from a distance of 2 feet. Ruby was
chosen because he was suffering from sphyllis of the
brain - it was systemic in his body. He was disposable.
So - back to the Pentagon. And whoever it was who said that Atta, "whom it was said flew one plane into one of the Twin Towers, was then seen alive somewhere in North Africa". OK. No, we don't know how much the CIA, FBI, had to do with 9/11. Killing more than 3,000 people is good for war. Who's to say it was the Taliban? Bin Laden was the Taliban. But there were terrorists all over the middle-east, loosely
associated, if at all. So, is it a fact that 3,000+ people
dying (Americans mostly) is a good excuse for going to war on 5 countries eventually.
Was Afghanistan a good war?
Were tortures in accordance with the Geneva Convention? Or does all that go out the moral window
when America military finds enemies?
Now, Syria is another matter. Iran is involved, but the
US can't be "seen" to support anything that Iran is
doing in Syria against ISIS. And, how do Russian weapons and tanks get to East Eukraine? How does
the USA send troups to Iraq for training of Iraqi soldiers who hate the USA, and have simply left their
uniforms, arms, etc., on the side of the road for ISIS to pick up?
Enough. Too much. Let the hawks fly :!: :!: :!:
Meanwhile, I'm calling an old friend from NY. Nighty
night. Bye for now Big Bob. I'll leave you to refute the
nut cases. You do it just fine. I am well-hated, and so
it goes.... :thumbup: :thumbup: