NorthernLight

I don't assassinate your character, I just call it out when you do it to yourself.

payne1000

Pennylynn, now that you've been shown to be a plagiarist, will readers give your comments any respect?

payne1000

Why don't you supply readers with an example of me assassinating my own character?
Your comment on this thread started with you consoling Pennylynn who had just been revealed to be a major plagiarist. Supporting your fellow Hasbarats is more important to you than being a patriotic American.

You ignore answering why you refuse to expose the lies which were told about 9/11? You know the towers were brought down by controlled demolition. You said so on the Attic forum. Controlled demolition would mean it wasn't Muslims who attacked us on 9/11. Is your silence because you are patriotic only to Israel?

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

payne1000, Where do you get this stuff about 9/11? The truth is that the towers were brought down by jihadist terrorism. Your hatred of Israel is so overwhelming that it makes all your so called points completely unbelievable. I don't understand why you deny " Muslims" brought down the towers". I recognize that it was not all Muslims. The evidence is so one compelling that it can not be denied. I saw the airplane crash into the world trade center hundreds of times on film. The perpetrators openly admit the act, including Osama. Consider this evidence that you are a fanatic, and a liar!

payne1000

I've been researching 9/11 for 15 years, SW.

It's not easy when all our Jewish-owned media is in on the cover-up.

If you knew anything about science and physics you would be able to tell the difference between a skyscraper which is burning and one which is being blown up

This is a building being blown up with explosives.


This is a building consumed in flames. It did not collapse.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

I have explained earlier, I have a memory that is not like most people, I am both blessed and cursed with remembering every last thing I read. When I prepared the document, I had prepared several versions and in anger and haste I actually presented the wrong document. This version was a working document and a rough draft (as indeed you complained was choppy and uneven in content) which I had intended only to provide me an overall guidance and my final version, although containing the same information, did have a list at the end of the document with a list of my sources. When I went back to reread my submitted comment after your comment, I saw my errors and provided you with additional web sites containing the rest of the references that I used to prepare my comment. I am unconcerned about this mistake on my part, I am not perfect and often use my memory for help in preparing comments. At the end of the day, I am very human and mistakenly submitted the wrong version as a comment.

I am less concerned for this error than pleased that I gave quality information with supportive evidence. If I were you, I would concern myself less with me providing references than with the content of the document and presenting a rebuttal of said content. You see, what was written is the truth and it is, as you demonstrated, not just my opinion pulled from my love for my people. It is a shared opinion of many.

Your complaint is duly noted and in the future I will be very careful to check each of my sentences to ensure I have not accidently included a sentence or paragraph that is very similar to someone else's published work. Even with this, I will still from time to time make mistakes. But, as OPP is not a site to submit academic papers for degree purposes, I feel confident that the content of the work should be debated and not necessarily where each sentence originated.

I am concerned with my reputation, but I feel sure that others will understand that mistakes can happen. Indeed, in another thread you questioned how I could have a response to you so quickly and I explained that I keep working files.

Now talking about rebuttals. Do prepare a rebuttal for the information I presented. That is prove the content unsubstantiated and without historical fact.

NorthernLight

You assassinate your own character in the way your argue and try to use "gotcha" traps as I illustrated in the previous post.

As to your claim that I refuse to expose lies, there are two parts to the answer. One lies in the fact that I am a known poster with a history of the other blog, so my claim had credibility with the other posters. I have no history on this blog, so my claims would be meaningless. The other lies in the fact that you twist words, trying to make another (me in this case) sound like they are saying something that they are not.

I'm sure that no one on this forum has the history to see this, but you undoubtedly understand that the way you construct your argument in your last paragraph is evidence of this claim.

Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone

In a word BS!! A couple of days ago, the entire case study of 911 was declassified and made available for everyone to see. http://www.cia.gov/news-information/press-releases-statements/2015-press-releases-statements/cia-releases-declassified-documents-related-to-9-11-attacks.html and http://www.foia.cia.gov/collection/declassified-documents-related-911-attacks

911 WAS A PRODUCT OF MUSLIMS and celebrated by MUSLIMS..... And you, being muslim will defend the murders they committed on 911 in anyway you can.

payne1000

"O, what a tangled web we weave when first we practise to deceive!" - Walter Scott

Your lies keep dragging you into more lies, Pennylynn.
If you had mistakenly posted a working document as you claim, that document would have had notations of the original sources included so you would have been able to provide the sources when you posted the document in your own words.

No, you chose to use the words of others and attempt to take credit that they were your own. You are a plagiarist and a liar.

payne1000

You post a CIA site and expect readers to believe that? The CIA was so deeply involved in the planning and execution of 9/11, why should readers believe anything they publish?

payne1000

As always, PrairieSeasons, (original username) you use words to confuse readers rather than answering the questions asked.

Do you deny that you revealed on the Attic and Chit Chat forums that you know the WTC towers were brought down with controlled demolition?

If you do deny it, you know I can prove you to be a liar.

Since you do know the towers were brought down by controlled demolition, doesn't it prove that Arabs did not take down the towers?

They had no access to place the explosives. The Secret Service and CIA had offices in WTC7. How could Arabs get into that building to plant explosives?

This man controlled access to all three buildings

NorthernLight

Actually, my original username on this site is NorthernLight. PrairieSeasons was and is my original username on another site, as yours was larrypayne. I'm not sure why you think that relevant, but apparently you do.

As in the past, you continue the obnoxious method of stating some things which I had previously stated and others with which I had not and then ask me to confirm the whole paragraph. And now you add insult by implying that I will lie to you. I don't have the patience for your games, Larry.

saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina

NorthernLight, Payne1000, is an anti-semite and a liar. The only person left in the world that refuses to believe that the twin towers were brought down by murdering jihadists is Payne1000. The entire world has seen films of the towers being crashed into by the skyjacked airliners. The bloody Muslim terrorist that did this not only admitted the act, but bragged about it. At the same time that it happened, other terrorists crashed into the Pentagon and another failed in it's mission of murder and crashed. Payne1000, inferrers that it was done by some guy named Silverman. I knew that he would find a way to blame a Jew. The only thing that this Payne1000 understands is " seig heil".

payne1000

I didn't say your name change was relevant, I pointed out why I was referring to you as "Prairieseasons". You accuse me of twisting words when you are the master at twisting and dodging. So far you have totally avoided answering my question about your knowledge of controlled demolitions of the towers and why you aren't outraged at the lies we have been told.

Since you don't deny that you know about the controlled demolitions, please tell readers why you are unwilling to answer my question which is--why are you not outraged at the lies the American people have been told about 9/11?
I suspect we won't get anything from you but more evasive doublespeak.

payne1000

Saltwind,

I guess you haven't heard what this member of the Military Intelligence Hall of Fame had to say about the Pentagon.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=71c_1311362426