Glaucon wrote:
The first and most important sign of intelligence is the ability to carefully and skeptically question ones own opinions, assumptions, beliefs, information and emotions.
Being "Skeptical" about one's own opinions is not the first sign of intelligence, it is the first result of doubt. And if you doubt your own opinion, how is it your opinion? Did you not just declare your doubt about what you say you believe?
Quote:
Without this ability, we are dumb, stupid, and ignorant.
Sounds to me more like
WITH this ability you are D, S, & I.
Quote:
With this ability we have the basic foundation for intelligence and without it, no amount of attempted self education and formal education will make a person intelligent.
Education does not make one intelligent. It makes them educated. And there is very little in education that is intelligent. There is only agreement among those educated, who have developed consensus that education is the first sign of intelligence. Not true, but agreed!
Quote:
Both liberals and conservatives can lack this ability and be dumb, Ignorant, or stupid.
Both liberals and conservatives can display this ability and be dumb, Ignorant,
AND stupid!
The first sign of intelligence is when you are willing to examine your own opinions to see if there may be room for doubt. THAT is not skepticism. That is an expression of the ability to reason rationally. It usually follows when someone else expresses doubt about your opinion.
Quote:
If reading this causes you to feel anger or rage and want to attack, it is a clear indication you lack this ability.
I am neither angry nor outraged, nor do I want to attack. I want to correct what I think is room for doubt in your expressed opinion.
Do you have the ability to reason rationally about the possibility your opinion may be faulted? THAT is a sign of intelligence.
Quote:
What did you feel when reading this? Did you quit reading it because of your anger? Do you have any questions about this or do you want to avoid, ignore, deflect the issue?
I felt challenged by an attempt to correctly express the first sign of intelligence. I felt the opinion missed by just a narrow defining of the issues, even though I found no defining elements within the post. I felt that the conclusion served as a defining element thereof.
Now I feel mostly curiosity. I want to see how you manage your own response to my assessment of your opinion.