Roseland wrote:
=================
If I am the management, I would not allow over booking. The safety and comfort of my passengers is most important.
When you make an agreement with a client, sign paper work, both parties must follow the contract in good faith. The passenger has paid his ticket, he was given a seat number to fly. The passenger was hoping to get to his destination on time to meet his responsibilities to his patients as a doctor. Had the UAL did not book him at the beginning, he could have found another flight to fly. But he was cheated, his rights were violated.
UAL violated the passenger's rights, and must pay penalty for the damage done.
Hope this will serve the airline a lesson next time.
================= br If I am the management, I wou... (
show quote)
I'm going to play Devils Advocate here, because I've been on the other side of this situation. First, some "facts" that I've read from this incident.
Yes, the flight was overbooked and the first batch of passengers were offered $400 and a free hotel room. Everyone boarded the flight, which was now NOT overbooked.
After the plane was boarded, 4 more seats were suddenly needed for airline mechanics. Passengers were offered $800 and a free hotel room, but there were no takers. At this time, random passengers were selected, including the doctor, who refused to give up his seat (I watched the video and I do believe his wife got up and followed him as he was dragged off the plane. Now, and this is just me - I'm thinking that's a quick $1,600 and a free hotel room for a little inconvenience...).
Now let's look at the "bigger picture"...the side I was on, along with about 250 other tired, weary passengers NOT being offered money and a comfy hotel room to pass 15 or so hours in while our connecting plane was broken down and a replacement part had to be flown in. Then, when the plane was finally fixed, we had to wait another 2-3 hours for another flight crew to fly in from somewhere because OUR crew was no longer able to fly because their "hours" were up and FAA has strict rules (kind of like truckers...when your driving hours are up, you shut off the engine no matter where you are). I was stuck last summer for 12 hours in two different airports when S/W Airlines systems went down...when one flight gets screwed up, it can be a domino effect that affects other airlines.
Employees, or their family members, fly on stand-by, which means paying passengers don't get bumped so they can fly, ever, for any reason. Airlines certainly don't offer passengers $800 for a seat so an employee can fly for "leisure".
The employees that needed to fly on that flight were MECHANICS. So that tells me (and that this was the case in this instance is conjuncture on my part, from having been in the same situation a few times in my flying experience) that on the other end of this flight was a broken down plane, with stranded passengers, and the mechanics on the other end were unable to fix it and these 4 were needed. This means that passengers had already been stranded at least 2 hours already (my guess).
SO...if you were in charge and you had a broken down plane (maybe a connecting flight like mine was, where everyone on the plane was from somewhere else and didn't have a home to go back to for a rescheduled flight) with 200 -250 passengers stranded at the airport, and you needed to fly in a crew to fix that plane from somewhere else, are you going to wait for a flight somewhere in the country that has room for exactly 4 mechanics, or are you going to find the closest 4 mechanics and fly them on the next flight, offering the paying passengers $800 and a hotel room for their inconvenience? And if no one wants to take that offer, what are you going to do? And if all but ONE selected passenger flat out refuses to give up their seat (and remember, no one else wanted to, not even for $800), then what? You still have 200-250 stranded passengers, that paid for you to fly them somewhere - what are you going to do for THEM? Keep them all stranded for who knows how many more hours because ONE passenger refuses to give up their seat? So you call on "the authorities" to remove this ONE passenger from his seat (because what are you going to do...just throw up your hands and say, "Well, no one wants to give up their seat, so I guess the passengers are in charge and we're just going to go ahead and take off". Really? And if that ONE passenger still refuses and starts screaming like a hurt puppy the minute his arm is touched to be escorted out of his seat, and goes totally limp like a three year old who doesn't want to go to bed...what would YOU do? Are you going to tell all those stranded passengers, "Well, sorry, couldn't get a passenger off because he was screaming and went limp, so...hang in there until we find a cooperative passenger".
Are we really getting to the point of total anarchy where no one has authority over anyone else or where no one has to comply with any authorities if we don't want to? Where we CAN act like self-centered, selfish, undisplined toddlers when we're faced with any inconvenience or asked to do something by any higher authority (and then reward such behavior with a big lawsuit pay-out when that authority has to EXERCISE their authority by force, if needed? I don't want to live in that kind of world and I certainly didn't raise my children to be that kind of citizen. I want to live in the kind of world where people think, "Hmmm, 4 mechanics have to fly somewhere and it's SO critical that the airline is willing to pay $3,200 and hotel rooms to make it happen. Maybe I can make a whole lot of people less stressed and their day a lot easier than mine would be by taking the money and putting up with a little inconvenience".
Just another point of view to ponder.