Richard Rowland

Out of curiosity, I Googled the question, was the communist Linen, a jew. A long read, describing the history of the Bolshevik Revolution, the murder of the Tsar, Nicoles II, and family, plus millions of citizens of Russia. What I found of interest is that the Bolshevik's were all jews.

Other points of interest are that their goal was then, the same goal of today. They had no sense of nationalism; they desired a global reorganization of the world.

I suppose much of the world has no idea of the atrocities perpetrated on the Russian people during the implementation of the communist system, by the Jewish Bolsheviks. The Nazi's had nothing on these guys, in fact, the Nazi SS was a chapter out of the book, written by the Jewish Cheka, later to be known as the KGB.

Reading this piece, I couldn't help but notice the similarities of what took place in Russia, and what seems to be taking place in today's world. Anyone with an intuitive sense has to be wondering: what else do the Jews have planned for the world. More importantly though, is the realization that jews seem to be at the center of most strife caused in the world. Beginning a couple millenniums ago, with a most glaring example: the crucifixion of Christ. Now, c'mon, didn't ya'll expect that comparison?

While the strife that befell Russia was contained within Russia, it's worth noting that, now, rather than one nation suffering, the whole world seems to be in turmoil.

Anyway, for those interested in knowing more. Google what I did. I'm not positive the same piece will come up, and I should have, probably, copied and pasted the whole piece. However, it was a long read, and I thought the eyes would glaze over, before the conclusion, of those with a less than an intense interest. Those that take the time to search this piece out, I'm assuming, will be dedicated enough to read the entire piece. However, I did copy and paste the paragraph below. I hope it will serve to induce interest for learning more.

More than was the case with the monarchies of western Europe, Russia's Tsar personally symbolized his land and nation.
Thus, the murder of the last emperor of a dynasty that had ruled Russia for three centuries not only symbolically presaged the Communist mass slaughter that would claim so many Russian lives in the decades that followed, but was symbolic of the Communist effort to kill the soul and spirit of Russia itself.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

So are you telling us that Jews are Communists? I don't think so!

Richard Rowland

No, I'm saying that the Bolsheviks were. I'm, also, saying if one reads the same piece I read, and if one can believe what they read, a pattern will be noticeable from then to now. Anyone paying attention should have concluded that Isreal has, thru, their lobbying efforts, a disproportionate influence over America's affairs. Plus, the media is owned and controlled by Jews.

I encourage you, and everyone else, to attempt to find the piece, read it, then draw your own conclusion. We get only the information intended for our consumption. There's much that's going on that's, deliberately, being left out of the news. Plus, I think there's too much Isreally tail wagging the American dog, and it doesn't bode well for Ameriacan interests.

Loki Loc: Georgia

How do you explain the pogroms against the Russian Jews, Richard? Russia has a history of persecuting Jews.
There is also the little matter of a loan to the Bolsheviks, which was orchestrated by Edward House, Woodrow Wilson's advisor and a self-proclaimed communist. The Bolshevik Revolution was on life support when it received an infusion of cash from both US and European banking interests. This was not that long after the formation of the Federal Reserve, and the bankers who were responsible for this loan were the founding members of the Council On Foreign Relations, just a couple of years later. (1921)

Of course, the Rothschild family of bankers, putative Jews, not only financed Jewish settlements in Palestine in the late 19t and early 20th century, they also loaned a pile of money to Hitler. Fascism, like Communism, is an expensive hobby. Someone has to pay for them, since they are not capable of paying for themselves.

Richard Rowland

What's that old saw? Politics make for strange bedfellows. I only know what I read and hear, Loki. You mention the pogroms affecting Russian Jews. I have no idea for the reasons that attitudes, and responses, are formed. However, there's usually a reason for everything.

The piece I did read, indicated that jews, prior to the Bolshevik revolution, were, pretty much, confined to a specific area of Russia. Was that because they were confined there by law, or by their own design? This is the problem with recorded history, we are at the mercy of those recording it. Hell, someday, someone might read what I've commented on and form an opinion regarding those comments, and I don't know shit! It's only when seen with our own eyes, or experienced first hand that we know the facts, and given enough time, facts we think we know can become distorted.

Loki Loc: Georgia

From the late 1700's up until 1917,Russian Jews were restricted to an area in Western Russian bordering what is now modern day Poland. This was known as the Jewish Pale in English. While it was formally abolished by the Provisional Russian Government in 1917, it was on the way to being abolished before the onset of WWI.
Jews were persecuted in Russia as a matter of course, and did not fair much better when the Bolsheviks won.

Richard Rowland

Obviously, Loki, there are two sides to most stories. The one you are referencing is different than the one I read. The one I read has no mention of systematic persecution, before the revolution. However, after, is a different story, the theory being that the Russian people were taking revenge for the murders of the Tsar and family. Once Stalin became ruler, he began to purge the Jewish Bolsheviks from the communist government. Stalin, of all those who plotted the revolution, was the only true Russian, according to this article.

Another point made: prior to the revolution, the economy was booming. Russia was purported to be feeding the whole of Europe. Also, that the Tsar was a benevolent ruler, allowing a free press, and other features that indicated, for that period, a modern society. This is a fascinating subject!

Loki Loc: Georgia

Benevolence is subjective. The Tsar was benevolent compared to some of them. For the time, place and circumstances, you could argue that he was enlightened, but only in comparison to other, less tolerant Tsars.
As far as the Russian economy, the Russians have always had a problem with producing enough food, even though they have probably more fertile farmland than anywhere else on Earth. Communist or Tsar, when you are taxed to death and held under someone's thumb, there isn't much incentive to overachieve. This is why Russia has been a smuggler's paradise for Lord knows how many centuries.
Smuggling does not have much traction in a prosperous society with low taxes. People are incentivized to do better when they are allowed to enjoy the fruits of their labor. Not so much when someone else gets to enjoy them instead. This is the basic problem with Socialism, Communism, Feudalism, and most other isms.

Richard Rowland

Ya, I read, recently, the comparison of fertile farmable land between the two countries. If I recall correctly, America's is one-sixth that of Russia's, yet America manages to feed herself and a large part of the world, while Russian has difficulty feeding Russians. Why, due to an ever shrinking world, and a vast amount of information at the fingertips, does a society cling to, as you put it, isms? Do you think it has something to do with population? The more people in the world the thinner the slice. Communism and the rest of the isms systems are used to control the resources for a select few, perhaps?

Loki Loc: Georgia

Call it societal inertia. Russians are used to an overbearing and tyrannical government and circumventing it by whatever means available. The greater degree of freedom they now experience is kind of a novelty to them. I think they're still getting used to it.

Alber

The Jews developed capitalism and are also the parents of communism. In Israel today there are kibus which is a form of communism. In the case of the Jews it is necessary to consider the religion as something independent of the political ideas. Zionism helped establish the state of Israel, but not all Jews are Zionists. This is not the case with Muslims who only have a political creed based on the Koran. It is interesting to read "The Protocols of the Sages of Zion" and "The International Jew" of Henry Ford. Remember that Jews claim to be God's chosen ones. It is also convenient to know something about the lost tribes of Israel. There are many people all over the world who are descendants of Jews and are unaware of it.
Communism is a utopia and in Russia there was never communism, what developed Stalin was a state capitalism, which functions in the same way as the slave system that the Russians knew very well, because still, shortly before the Bolshevik revolution in that country still existed the serfs of the field. In the so-called communism the masters are the officials at various levels and the workers and peasants are the slaves. Socialism pretends to be better because it is based on a distribution of wealth, but in the end it is the same garbage. It is convenient to read "Socialism is the Slavery of the Future", written by Herbert Spence in the late nineteenth century. The Russians went from a slave system to another slave system and only now are they knowing something new in a limited way, because they still need the "strong man" the dictator to govern, because they are not yet accustomed to think for themselves. It is the same as with Muslims. The Koran is all they need to guide their lives and need masters who are brutal like Saddam Hussein, Muamar El Gadafy, Saudi kings and ayatollahs. They are not accustomed to being free. The wars in the Middle East have cost the Western countries, especially the United States, resources and lives without any result obtained because a bad ruler is replaced by an equal one and there is no thanks for having released them, since they consider that it wants to be impose on them something that they do not understand: "democracy".

rebob14

You found it.........what's the problem? Provide the link or save the BS!

Jokerswild Loc: The bottom of the deck...most likely

You really think the Jews are responsible for woe and misery in world affairs I would suggest doing a little research on the Jesuits. You'll find most probably those with an intuitive sense will be wondering if the real question becomes "what more have the Jesuits have planned for this world".

PulletSurprise Loc: Columbus, GA

If Israel is as terrible as some people insisting, why are millions of Israeli Arabs happy and content to live and work INSIDE Israel, as Israeli citizens? Why are they not fleeing to nearby Arab countries?

Why don't the islamic nations like Saudi Arabia provide a parcel of their land and allow the Palestinians to prosper?

Why does the world focus on Israel (Israel is smaller than New Jersey and less populated than New York City)? 1 out of every 5 people that live in Israel are muslim, name one Mid Eastern muslim nation that Jews comprise even 1% ?