One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out topic: Be a Proud American Patriot
Main
Who Is Really Responsible For The Chemical Attack In Syria?
This topic is locked to prevent further replies.
This discussion is continued in a new topic. You can find it here.
Page <<first <prev 97 of 99 next> last>>
 
This topic was split up because it has reached high page count.
You can find the follow-up topic here.
 
May 6, 2017 15:42:24   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
As with all smoke, debris and heat related flows, the temperatures vary depending on the source. Volcanic explosions contain molten lava. When molten lava explodes, the pyroclastic flows carry the heat from that lava. The explosions in the towers did not contain nearly as much molten material as a volcano, therefore the pyroclastic flows produced by the tower explosions were not as hot overall. It's amusing to see how desperate you cover-up shills are that you have to argue word meanings instead of the important facts.
Maybe you can explain why the PBS documentary animation showed the center core still standing after the floors had fallen past it?
As with all smoke, debris and heat related flows, ... (show quote)
You have a remarkable talent for obfuscating. Did you not say, "On 9/11 a dense destructive mass of very hot ash . . . . "? Did you not claim the tower collapses were pyroclastic? Now, you are trying to cool it all down with another inane attempt to explain yourself. There was no pyroclastic flow generated by the collapse of the towers. Not even close.

Newflash: The detonation of a chemical explosive generates an exothermic blast wave, the speed of this wave is determined by the detonation velocity, it is nearly instantaneous, and the exothermic blast wave rapidly dissipates. A detonation obviously can cause ignition of readily flammable materials, but it does not expose anything to sustained heat. IOW, the detonation of a chemical explosive does not heat concrete, steel, or anything else to high sustained temperatures. It is not possible that an explosive load for a controlled demolition could impart any significant heat to the concrete and steel in the towers. The heating of the building was solely due to the fires. And, FYI, those fires were NOT "small, random fires that quickly burned out." Such a fallacious claim is thoughtless and patently absurd.

There will come a miracle if you ever actually know WTF you are talking about.

Reply
May 6, 2017 15:50:37   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
ACP45 wrote:
---------------
I guess you did not watch the video. Go to 6:30 and 7:40 and then we can discuss your proposition that the Syrian Air Force used chemical weapons in the attack.


You must have missed some of the interviews conducted with some of the survivors of that attack, that had lost children and their wives and family members. No doubt at all those individuals would think your theory is insane! Of course those people were there...what would THEY know, right?

Reply
May 6, 2017 15:50:48   #
amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle
 
I guess I nailed it. You had no response for your incorrect use of pyroclastic flow. Please don't let your head explode.

Paynegasm
Paynegasm...

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:38:41   #
payne1000
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Is that all you have? Just another weird ass Nazi, sounding like a loop tape repeating the same lame song. .......do some research Himler, just because your dumbass doesn't know who i am........does not make me anonymous, just makes you ignorant for not knowing.........Punk!.

I am out there, spend less time with your Jew hating and find me.......Punk!


I don't go looking for stupid.
I'm more interested in truth than liars.

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:40:11   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
payne1000 wrote:
I don't go looking for stupid.
I'm more interested in truth than liars.
If you ever come across some that "truth", please share.

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:41:47   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
payne10a00 wrote:
I don't go looking for stupid.
I'm more interested in truth than liars.





I understand.....waking up stupid every day you've probably had enough. ......then you start posting your nonsense and blow that theory from the water.....good job Himler.

Zeig Heil!

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:43:02   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
You have a remarkable talent for obfuscating. Did you not say, "On 9/11 a dense destructive mass of very hot ash . . . . "? Did you not claim the tower collapses were pyroclastic? Now, you are trying to cool it all down with another inane attempt to explain yourself. There was no pyroclastic flow generated by the collapse of the towers. Not even close.

Newflash: The detonation of a chemical explosive generates an exothermic blast wave, the speed of this wave is determined by the detonation velocity, it is nearly instantaneous, and the exothermic blast wave rapidly dissipates. A detonation obviously can cause ignition of readily flammable materials, but it does not expose anything to sustained heat. IOW, the detonation of a chemical explosive does not heat concrete, steel, or anything else to high sustained temperatures. It is not possible that an explosive load for a controlled demolition could impart any significant heat to the concrete and steel in the towers. The heating of the building was solely due to the fires. And, FYI, those fires were NOT "small, random fires that quickly burned out." Such a fallacious claim is thoughtless and patently absurd.

There will come a miracle if you ever actually know WTF you are talking about.
You have a remarkable talent for obfuscating. Did ... (show quote)


You cowardly anonymous shills can't address the important questions I raise so you attempt to create a straw man argument.
Explain why PBS showed the center core still standing after the floors allegedly pancaked?
Isn't it because if the truss connections disconnected from the center core, there would be no force which could cause the center core to fall?

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:44:57   #
payne1000
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
If you ever come across some that "truth", please share.


Okay. The alleged 19 hijackers did not show up on the airport security cameras at Dulles and Logan Airports on 9/11.
That indicates they didn't get on the planes.
I have more. Do you want more?

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:45:02   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
If you ever come across some that "truth", please share.




His truth will be in a Utube video......hope you don't mind everyone knows they are gospel

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:47:06   #
payne1000
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
I understand.....waking up stupid every day you've probably had enough. ......then you start posting your nonsense and blow that theory from the water.....good job Himler.

Zeig Heil!


Those who always bring up Nazis as an insult are attempting to cover up for Zionists, who are the new Nazis.



Reply
May 6, 2017 16:49:39   #
payne1000
 
amadjuster wrote:
I guess I nailed it. You had no response for your incorrect use of pyroclastic flow. Please don't let your head explode.


I had more than one response for your narrow-minded interpretation of pyroclastic flow.
Do you have a response for why the alleged 19 hijackers didn't show up on the airport security videos on 9/11?

Reply
May 6, 2017 16:55:17   #
payne1000
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
His truth will be in a Utube video......hope you don't mind everyone knows they are gospel


PBS made a documentary about 9/11. An animation PBS produced for that documentary showed the center core of the towers still standing after everything else had fallen past it.
That shows that the pancake theory which emarine has been attempting to sell is totally false. Even the animators who were working on a documentary to support the Bush Administration conspiracy theory couldn't figure out how those allegedly pancaking floors could cause the center core to fall.



Reply
May 6, 2017 16:58:28   #
emarine
 
payne1000 wrote:
Again you ignore the PBS documentary which shows the center core still standing after the floors pancake past it.
The strength of the center core was the reason NIST abandoned the pancake theory which you so desperately cling to.
Eighth grade mentality and spending too much time at IHOP has done you in again..




I love IHOP... & you're still clueless on 8th grade physics & 911... the floor system was a complex diaphragm design... tall lightweight towers are very flexible...not a big heavy slab with a square hole in the middle putz... it was the outside floor truss tabs that sheared first dropping the outside edge down first allowing the outer framework to lean outward, fall bend & snap or peel@ all different lengths... nothing but pure gravity involved & a big mass in motion... you understand very little & keep on blabbing stupid shit like pancakes... the floors fell apart in millions of pieces being bashed to dust with 1000's of tons of sheet rock or powered gypsum as large steel sections twisted & fell from 1400' high to the ground...face facts putz a 1400' tower will make a big mess while collapsing...



Reply
May 6, 2017 17:09:52   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
payne1000 wrote:
Those who always bring up Nazis as an insult are attempting to cover up for Zionists, who are the new Nazis.





Awwww, there's that stupidity on a loop again, how many times have you posted that. ...3000 maybe 4000 times......thanks for solidifying my argument concerning your stupidity.

Good job Himler.....go kick a Jew to make yourself feel better........Punk!

Reply
May 6, 2017 17:14:27   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
payne1000 wrote:
PBS made a documentary about 9/11. An animation PBS produced for that documentary showed the center core of the towers still standing after everything else had fallen past it.
That shows that the pancake theory which emarine has been attempting to sell is totally false. Even the animators who were working on a documentary to support the Bush Administration conspiracy theory couldn't figure out how those allegedly pancaking floors could cause the center core to fall.




Shut up! Your idiocy is wasted on me......my complany has a division that implodes buildings.....you know nothing on the matter.

I repeat...Shut up idiot!.............Punk!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 97 of 99 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out topic: Trump Diapers
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.