I no longer wish to be dissociated from your foolishness.
Upon further deliberation, I have decided that the assertion of the inaccuracy of your statement was inaccurate.
I have never lied about anything I have been truthful about.
As to the matter of the probity of your stance on this issue, that matter will be taken under advisement.
The question before this body, is whether the answer provided for the previous question was indeed an answer to the question, or an answer to a different question not as yet asked.
In reference to the afore mentioned matter, the matter referenced will be determined at a later date, to be referenced at that time.
At no time shall any portion of this clause be construed to contradict any portion of this clause at any time.
Pursuant to all other related articles, this article shall take precedence, accepting where other articles shall have precedence, and pursuant to all other related articles that have precedence, pursuant to this article.
At no time shall any member of this body speak on the matters before this body, unless asked.
All personnel in this department shall direct all questions relating to the department, to the public information office, accepting where the personnel questioned may answer said questions, pursuant to department protocol.
lpnmajor wrote:
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your foolishness.
Upon further deliberation, I have decided that the assertion of the inaccuracy of your statement was inaccurate.
I have never lied about anything I have been truthful about.
As to the matter of the probity of your stance on this issue, that matter will be taken under advisement.
The question before this body, is whether the answer provided for the previous question was indeed an answer to the question, or an answer to a different question not as yet asked.
In reference to the afore mentioned matter, the matter referenced will be determined at a later date, to be referenced at that time.
At no time shall any portion of this clause be construed to contradict any portion of this clause at any time.
Pursuant to all other related articles, this article shall take precedence, accepting where other articles shall have precedence, and pursuant to all other related articles that have precedence, pursuant to this article.
At no time shall any member of this body speak on the matters before this body, unless asked.
All personnel in this department shall direct all questions relating to the department, to the public information office, accepting where the personnel questioned may answer said questions, pursuant to department protocol.
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your fooli... (
show quote)
OK......I've read it 4 times now, and the best I can come up with is that this is some sort of a statement from the smart-ass wife of a smartass.
lpnmajor wrote:
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your foolishness.
Upon further deliberation, I have decided that the assertion of the inaccuracy of your statement was inaccurate.
I have never lied about anything I have been truthful about.
As to the matter of the probity of your stance on this issue, that matter will be taken under advisement.
The question before this body, is whether the answer provided for the previous question was indeed an answer to the question, or an answer to a different question not as yet asked.
In reference to the afore mentioned matter, the matter referenced will be determined at a later date, to be referenced at that time.
At no time shall any portion of this clause be construed to contradict any portion of this clause at any time.
Pursuant to all other related articles, this article shall take precedence, accepting where other articles shall have precedence, and pursuant to all other related articles that have precedence, pursuant to this article.
At no time shall any member of this body speak on the matters before this body, unless asked.
All personnel in this department shall direct all questions relating to the department, to the public information office, accepting where the personnel questioned may answer said questions, pursuant to department protocol.
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your fooli... (
show quote)
Nice. Here, try this:
"The maximum price which a manufacturer may charge to any class of purchasers for any packaged cosmetic priced under the general maximum price regulation shall be the maximum price established under the general maximum price regulation for sales of such packaged cosmetics by him to a purchaser of the same class."
US Government Office of Price Administration 1941
lpnmajor wrote:
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your foolishness.
Upon further deliberation, I have decided that the assertion of the inaccuracy of your statement was inaccurate.
I have never lied about anything I have been truthful about.
As to the matter of the probity of your stance on this issue, that matter will be taken under advisement.
The question before this body, is whether the answer provided for the previous question was indeed an answer to the question, or an answer to a different question not as yet asked.
In reference to the afore mentioned matter, the matter referenced will be determined at a later date, to be referenced at that time.
At no time shall any portion of this clause be construed to contradict any portion of this clause at any time.
Pursuant to all other related articles, this article shall take precedence, accepting where other articles shall have precedence, and pursuant to all other related articles that have precedence, pursuant to this article.
At no time shall any member of this body speak on the matters before this body, unless asked.
All personnel in this department shall direct all questions relating to the department, to the public information office, accepting where the personnel questioned may answer said questions, pursuant to department protocol.
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your fooli... (
show quote)
Gingrich, after a major misstep in an interview on Republican policy: "If you quote me, you are lying." Have to love the simplicity.
Larry the Legend wrote:
Nice. Here, try this:
"The maximum price which a manufacturer may charge to any class of purchasers for any packaged cosmetic priced under the general maximum price regulation shall be the maximum price established under the general maximum price regulation for sales of such packaged cosmetics by him to a purchaser of the same class."
US Government Office of Price Administration 1941
Couldn't have not said it better myself had I not said it better.
lpnmajor wrote:
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your foolishness.
Upon further deliberation, I have decided that the assertion of the inaccuracy of your statement was inaccurate.
I have never lied about anything I have been truthful about.
As to the matter of the probity of your stance on this issue, that matter will be taken under advisement.
The question before this body, is whether the answer provided for the previous question was indeed an answer to the question, or an answer to a different question not as yet asked.
In reference to the afore mentioned matter, the matter referenced will be determined at a later date, to be referenced at that time.
At no time shall any portion of this clause be construed to contradict any portion of this clause at any time.
Pursuant to all other related articles, this article shall take precedence, accepting where other articles shall have precedence, and pursuant to all other related articles that have precedence, pursuant to this article.
At no time shall any member of this body speak on the matters before this body, unless asked.
All personnel in this department shall direct all questions relating to the department, to the public information office, accepting where the personnel questioned may answer said questions, pursuant to department protocol.
I no longer wish to be dissociated from your fooli... (
show quote)
UH?did we step into the twilight zone ????
Armageddun wrote:
Not knowing, I cannot say, therefore, I will not e... (
show quote)
I was starting to doubt myself on this one until I came to the realization that my doubts were only questions that I had no answers to. I'm good now.
archie bunker wrote:
I was starting to doubt myself on this one until I came to the realization that my doubts were only questions that I had no answers to. I'm good now.
Quirky questions quietly quit quickly.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.