HedgeHog

Thanks, nwtk. He is so wrapped up in what he thinks is right, his mind is shut to any other way of looking at objective reality.

I avoid him.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Agree. But I'd not use the word "thinks" as regards him. It doesn't apply. I'm not even sure he thinks he thinks something.

Know what I mean?

HedgeHog

Do you suppose he's reading something off of a teleprompter?

HedgeHog

And the vast majority of scientists apparently have yet to read my topic: "Reading Galileo".

theotts

I'd say you're either 1) a liar, or 2) an elementary school teacher (or possibly student)

If you're a scientist, on which planet?

HedgeHog

A 'bot?

Gotta hit the hay, nwtk. Good night.

(Hate to leave you tangling with theotts. Maybe if we all just ignore him, he will slither away).

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

Give me a minute here. Our university physics professor told us that the four fundamental forces in the universe are gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong and weak nuclear forces. But, according to you, I am theoretically sitting here at a measured 194 pounds, theoretically sending theoretical electrons over the theoretical internet so others can theoretically read the theoretical pixels on their computer screen that is theoretically being held to a desk.

Looking at the big picture, according to you, our universe is not a fact, it is only theoretical.

Now, about the evolution thing. That, my friend, is a theory. The latest advances in physics, organic chemistry, zoology, anthropology, paleontology, molecular and cellular biology, microbiology, geology, archeology, astronomy, astro-physics, and cosmology have tossed Darwin's theory in the dumpster. Even Darwin himself admitted "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down." Hello, Cambrian Explosion. Yep, that baby blew Darwin's Tree of Life all to pieces. Darwin himself began having doubts. But when dear old archaeopteryx popped up in a German quarry, the evolutionists went all "Hallelujah", thinking they found the missing link. Sorry, guys, old "arch" didn't make the grade, he couldn't link to anything. Bottom line: the evolutionists are not going to put Humpty Dumpty back together.

Aside from all that, there is one thing about life that no scientist in any field can come close to explaining, least of all the evolutionists---Consciousness, the ability to be self-aware, to think, to reason, to make choices, to imagine, to dream. Even those in the neurosciences and cognitive psychology, even cognitive philosophy, remain puzzled and unable to reveal any scientific data on Consciousness. Yeah, they can monitor and measure brain activity and watch the Alphas, Betas, Deltas, Gammas, and Thetas make their fancy little lines on O-scopes and graphs, but none of this says a word about Consciousness. Brain scientists can even study such marvelous things as neuromodulation and Thalamocortical oscillations, and still they cannot find a single molecule or atom or quark of Consciousness.

Sadly, Darwinism and the theory of evolution is taught in our schools, bottom to top, it's in all the textbooks, syllabuses, and even offered as a major study in universities. Darwinism and evolution theories should be scrapped forthwith. It is encouraging to see that more and more scientists, as they move forward in their research and investigations, agree with that.

America Only Loc: From the right hand of God

Bet on the NAG? Must be hard for you to have to face the reality of how mentally sick you are. Do other Negros have the "Massa" complex or just you?

bdamage Loc: My Bunker

Danny boy you've bought into the hoax of "climate change"....or like I call it, weather.

You ARE a good little thebott, aren't you?


NASA Global Warming Stance Blasted By 49 Astronauts, Scientists Who Once Worked At Agency
By David Freeman

Is NASA playing fast and loose with climate change science? That'™s the contention of a group of 49 former NASA scientists and astronauts.

On March 28 the group sent a letter to NASA administrator Charles Bolden, Jr., blasting the agency for making unwarranted claims about the role of carbon dioxide in global warming, Business Insider reported.

"We believe the claims by NASA and GISS [NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies], that man-made carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data," the group wrote. "With hundreds of well-known climate scientists and tens of thousands of other scientists publicly declaring their disbelief in the catastrophic forecasts, coming particularly from the GISS leadership, it is clear that the science is NOT settled."

The group features some marquee names, including Michael F. Collins, Walter Cunningham and five other Apollo astronauts, as well as two former directors of NASA'™s Johnson Space Center in Houston.
Full article:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/11/nasa-global-warming-letter-astronauts_n_1418017.html


More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Challenge UN IPCC :Panel

Note: This report was originally published in 2010. It is of utmost relevance to the ongoing debate on climate change. .

Link to Complete 321-Page PDF Special Report

More than 1,000 dissenting scientists (updates previous 700 scientist report) from around the globe have now challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and former Vice President Al Gore. This new 2010 321-page Climate Depot Special Report” updated from the 2007 groundbreaking U.S. Senate Report of over 400 scientists who voiced skepticism about the so-called global warming (œconsensus)” features the skeptical voices of over 1,000 international scientists, including many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC. This updated 2010 report includes a dramatic increase of over 300 additional (and growing) scientists and climate researchers since the last update in March 2009. This report's release coincides with the 2010 UN global warming summit in being held in Cancun.

The more than 300 additional scientists added to this report since March 2009 (21 months ago), represents an average of nearly four skeptical scientists a week speaking out publicly. The well over 1,000 dissenting scientists are almost 20 times the number of UN scientists (52) who authored the media-hyped IPCC 2007 Summary for Policymakers.

The chorus of skeptical scientific voices grew louder in 2010 as the Climategate scandal -” which involved the upper echelon of UN IPCC scientists - detonated upon on the international climate movement. "œI view Climategate as science fraud, pure and simple," said noted Princeton Physicist Dr. Robert Austin shortly after the scandal broke. Climategate prompted UN IPCC scientists to turn on each other. UN IPCC scientist Eduardo Zorita publicly declared that his Climategate colleagues Michael Mann and Phil Jones "œshould be barred from the IPCC process. They are not credible anymore."
Full story:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/more-than-1000-international-scientists-dissent-over-man-made-global-warming-claims/5403284


What better way to control the entire population of the planet than to tax the air we breathe?

What a hoax!
How gullible you are Danny boy.

HedgeHog

The theory of evolution is not incompatible with a belief in God. In fact, if you look closely at evolution, it is actually evidence for the existence of God, not His non-existence.

Did you get a chance to read my topic: "Chromosome 2"?

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-94395-1.html

The abnormality I mentioned that is associated with Chromosome 2, synesthesia, is a condition where the stimulation of one...cognitive pathway leads to an automatic, involuntary stimulation of a second...cognitive pathway.

There are two implications here:

1. That this is in some way related to man's ability to conceptualize and make mental connections other animals can not; and

2. Could this happen if the two chromosomes were separate?

All I ask is that you think about it.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

Whattaya mean, what am I going to say? Do you think I don't believe in climate change? Do you think I deny human activity is influential?



Really? OK...say I take that as true. Historically speaking (much less geologically speaking!), we've only kept the type of records you cite for about 150 years. Your claim doesn't say very much. Especially, since historically and scientifically speaking it can be proven that in recorded history we have gone through at least three cycles of significant warming and cooling of about 1500 years each. You realize, don't you, how significant the cyclic nature climate is and how it is influenced by other cycles, from the orbits of planets to ocean currents? It's been warmer and cooler numerous times for centuries.



"Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to lose." I have no idea why you launched into this particular sermon, so I thought I'd say something equally as relevant.



License? How so? Who's rights am I violating? What don't I understand? Why are you calling me names? Do you feel threatened and afraid? You make no sense. I suggest weed. It helps me!

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

You mean the climate change we're experiencing now is the result of CO2 emissions?

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

I did already. Didn't you read the open letter to Secretary General of the UN? There are plenty of folks in the scientific community that are skeptical of AGW and even more who disagree as to the degree human activity has contributed to global warming (which records will show has been occurring since records have been kept), and a number of others who believe that if all fossil fuels ceased to be used today, it's already too late.

So...what do you think would stave off global catastrophe?

HedgeHog

Only for the Leftist/Liberals.

HedgeHog

theotts wrote:
I'll just point out here that my explanation of climate change stands unchallenged.
Not one of you can advance any sort of contrary explanation. What a surprise.

That has got to be the most irrational and transparent statement of any made by a Leftist/Lib on OPP.

1. It is simply NOT true, that his explanation "stands unchallenged."

2. More than one person here has "advanced...contrary explanations."

One wonders if theotts even reads the posts of others, or if he does, is he comprehending them?

This is why I've wondered if Ovomit et al. is behind his posts. Can't you just hear Ovomit trumpeting: "My statement that Republicans don't have the right values for America stands unchallenged and no one has advanced contrary notions."

As the child says to his mother "No, my hand isn't in the cookie jar" and expects that she will believe it.