[quote=dongreen76]
CowboyMilt wrote:
THE INVADERS aren't coming her to freely practice their religion unless you think practicing Islam is a good thing...the Kuran states very boldly that they go to other countries & TAKE OVER....I SURE AS HELL DON'T WANT THEM TO TAKE OVER...& if your think about it with some logical
it was argued pryor to are invasion of Iraq that there was no imminent danger hence no need for an invasion .It was also argued that if you react as you are reacting,let them upset your culture social protocols, we are in the midst of doing just that,you emboden the terrorist, it encourages them to escalate their terrorism.Look at the upheaval they are causing.They are probably gleefully, chuckling on their laurels at their success,it is doing just what it is designed to do.Your reaction,your exploited heightened since of paranoia. will eventually do more harm than their random acts of terror that come few and far between.You're more than likely to be the victim of a homebread American crime than by a terrorist. Statistics say you are,I quote, FDR, you have nothing to fear but fear it self.Fear makes you over react and can create anarchic like conditons.
THE INVADERS aren't coming her to freely practice ... (
show quote)
Who do u think ur fooling? Really? Really? Brain dead fool.
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
Just go hang yourself...do humanity a favor!
[quote=dongreen76]No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
Continued
dongreen76 wrote:
P. S. Further more ,referencing the chief executive defense of his fireing the chief lawyer,It is the case that it has not been established that his ban on immigrants claiming that they are detrimental to the countries national security,is lame general circumstanciality due to the fact that he doesn't know that on a individual basis,it is
a very common practice that every law enforcement official knows and loves to -fascistially loves to implement.Yeah,thats right STEREOTYPING.only against someone else that is not of.the stereotypers sect,which gives rise to the hitler type Idealisim we call fascism.Jews are well versed in that,Nationalisim would Identify with fascism, the only difference is fascism is selective of one sect of people,and a nationalisim would shut the whole globe out,In any event neither a nationalist or a fascist would be consistent with this countries principals,Theres a difference between being a patriot,and a nationalist.North Koreans seem to be Nationalist,so did nazi germany.The bottom line on the firing of the A.G. is that it wasn't proved that the president was consistent with the law,he did that with out
a bit of due process and very circumstantial reasonable suspicion.
P. S. Further more ,referencing the chief execut... (
show quote)
Work on your writing skills. Incoherent run on sentences are the mark of a poor education.
FYI: The POTUS has the legal authority to ban immigrants and refugees any time he wants if it is a national security issue. Obama acted on that authority six times, GW Bush did it six times, Clinton did it, Reagan did it, Carter did it also. (Carter invalidated ALL Iranian visas)
Trump did not fire the AG, he fired the Deputy AG who was temporarily acting AG. Obama RECOMMENDED Yates, AG Holder hired her.
Deputy and Assistant positions are not subject to the senatorial process of confirmation that Cabinet Officers, Directors, Secretaries, and SCOTUS justices are. The POTUS is entirely within his legal authority to fire a deputy or assistant. He's the boss, ya know?
Save the psychobabble for the idiots in your choir.
Question: Do you believe that radical muslim terrorists are a threat here in the US?
dongreen76 wrote:
P. S. Further more ,referencing the chief executive defense of his fireing the chief lawyer,It is the case that it has not been established that his ban on immigrants claiming that they are detrimental to the countries national security,is lame general circumstanciality due to the fact that he doesn't know that on a individual basis,it is
a very common practice that every law enforcement official knows and loves to -fascistially loves to implement.Yeah,thats right STEREOTYPING.only against someone else that is not of.the stereotypers sect,which gives rise to the hitler type Idealisim we call fascism.Jews are well versed in that,Nationalisim would Identify with fascism, the only difference is fascism is selective of one sect of people,and a nationalisim would shut the whole globe out,In any event neither a nationalist or a fascist would be consistent with this countries principals,Theres a difference between being a patriot,and a nationalist.North Koreans seem to be Nationalist,so did nazi germany.The bottom line on the firing of the A.G. is that it wasn't proved that the president was consistent with the law,he did that with out
a bit of due process and very circumstantial reasonable suspicion.
P. S. Further more ,referencing the chief execut... (
show quote)
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
You can reproduce all you want. Why should society BE FORCED TO PAY for your participation in the "reproductive right" to have an abortion? Call your local PP butcher shop and ask them for pre-natal care.
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
Ahhhhh, nobody cares if a whore wants to be a whore, many just don't want to have they're tax dollars paying for it.
Thanks to the ACA, Americans are forced now to pay for such activities, sometimes over and over again.
Much like the last Administration, promiscuity was pushed by the Nazi party.
Helped to stem emotional attachment to a mate.
Also, you do realize that Russia is a Democracy now right?
Your walking down a slippery slope, slim.
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
Correct lables. Wrong people.
Move to Iran.
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
Hold off on this until the next intensive session with your therapist.
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
I didn't have to read this post to know you are, without doubt, the most stupid poster on OPP! Exclamation Point.
[quote=dongreen76]
dongreen76 wrote:
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close association with the chief executive and
president Putin.He was understudying in the not so fine arts of Marxism.No,totalitarianism,more precisely, Dictatorship 101,He wants to dictate peoples reproductive rights,which has strong implications toward being anti first amendment.Pro choice,Pro life is a freedom of religion conflict.Morality comes from religion,to dictate to Amercans what their religion should be undermines the premise in which this country was estabished.The pilgrims voyaged to this country to worship in their own way;free to be an atheist, free to be an agnostic;free to be a christian,and yes,free to be of the Islamic faith.To deny people the right to plan parenthood.Because it is antithetical to the Christian faith advocates
of church first,state second.The dictator is striking hard at the matrices of liberty,What was the bases for the firing of the attorney general,and does he have the Constituional power to do that,he doesn't have the power to hire,he has the power to recommend,the senate confirms whether their hired or not,That which percipitates their firing or not firing rest solely on the laws,whether they enforce and prosecute those that offend or break constitutional laws of the land .The constitution is the attorney generals boss,not the president.A dictator would be the boss of the countries chief lawyer.Did something pass me.Now,suspending the whole concept of constitutional law in lieu of executive order,ignoring the historical Ideology.that which creates the feud between the U.S. and Nazi Germany, Russia,China, Bin-laden,Castro, etc....That is to aid and abeit the opposing Ideology,by dismissing those whom sought political asylum,to throw them under the bus,after a predecessor encouraged them "FREEDOM LUVIN' PEOPLE" to rise up against oppression,tyranny, and such latent evil of sort,well I wouldn't call it totaltarian,but it sure in hell doesn't support the premise and foundations of which we have grounded are selves on.It's separatist,which frankly delano roosevelt believed in,which he did every thing possible to keep out of world war two,Later on it was decided that had the US got involved earlier Hitler would not been able to reek as much on the world as he did,so much for isolationism, and depending on the great pond to shield us from the rest of the world and its woes.Which is why real presidents feel the need to curtail the various terroist organizations.
Continued
No wonder !!! There is such a cordial,close associ... (
show quote)
Where do you get your information saying Trump and Putin even know each other let alone have a cordial.close relationship? I'd like to read it so please provide the article(s) or links. Thanks.
I don't think Trump or anyone is telling anyone what they can or cannot do with their reproductive machinery. I believe they are saying, pay for it yourself. Do you have a problem with that or do you equate women with dogs in heat who cannot control themselves and you think taxpayers should pick up the tab for their lack of control?
Finally, your sentences structure is quite unorganized as you run sentences and thoughts together. Quite reminiscent of another poster here. Please attempt to be more clear as to the points you are making. It will make it much easier to address each one. Thanks.
Docadhoc wrote:
Where do you get your information saying Trump and Putin even know each other let alone have a cordial.close relationship? I'd like to read it so please provide the article(s) or links. Thanks.
I don't think Trump or anyone is telling anyone what they can or cannot do with their reproductive machinery. I believe they are saying, pay for it yourself. Do you have a problem with that or do you equate women with dogs in heat who cannot control themselves and you think taxpayers should pick up the tab for their lack of control?p
Finally, your sentences structure is quite unorganized as you run psentences and thoughts together. Quite reminiscent ofkx another poster here. Please attempt to be more clear as to the points you are making. It will make it much easier to address each one. Thanks.
Where do you get your information saying Trump and... (
show quote)
Read your last paragraph fool,that is about the extent I'm and running sentences together. No,Donald Trump is not that big of a fool,he don't want you to pay for it.Reproduction rights are discussions pertaining to whether or not we should permit americans to abort pregnancies. [ that means when a woman is having a baby,do we let her destroy it before it is born.]Let me see what other fool ass iliterate shit did you find an issue with.Oh yes,after all that hoopla,all those discussions going on about a year while he was campaigning;like two lovers repertoire,"Cause he said sum'un nice bout'me".you say there is not a cordial rapport between the two,not to mention he has business interest in russia.People have been discussing this for over a year.Finally, are you one of those gender of a third kind. P S. I use an a -bundance of coordinating conjunctions,and preposition, as you did in your last paragraph.I also offset that -correctly with a semi-colon,because in my mind that is one complete thought; for
instance;The sentence above [ I also offset that ,-correctly with a semi-colon.]I couldn't start a sentence off with" I also offset.....that would be a fragmented sentence,a dependent clause,dependent on the pryor sentence that tells what I why I'm talking about offsetting something with a semi-colon; you should learn how to read the various punctuation marks and you'll get more out of your reading.I would say you can't read based on your critique of the substance of what I was talking about.
dongreen76 wrote:
Read your last paragraph fool,that is about the extent I'm and running sentences together No,Donald Trump is not that big of a fool,he don't want you to pay for it.Reproduction rights are discussions pertaining to whether or not we should permit americans to abort pregnancies. [ that means when a woman is having a baby,do we let her destroy it before it is born.Let me see what fool ass iliterate shit did you find an issue with.Oh yes,After all that hoopla,all those discussions going on about a year,while he was campaigning;like lovers repertoire,"Cause he said sum'un nice bout'me".you say there is not a cordial rapport between the two,not to mention he has business interest in russia.People have been discussing for over a year.finally, are you one of those gender of a third kind. P S. I use an a bundance of coordinating conjunctions,and preposition as you did in your last paragraph.I also offset that -correctly with a semi-colon,because in my mind that is one complete thought; for
instance;The sentence above [ I also offset that ,-correctly with a semi-colon.]I couldn't start a sentence off with" I also offset.....that would be a fragmented sentence,a dependent clause,dependent on the pryor sentence that tells what I why I'm talking about offsetting something with a semi-colon; you should learn how to read the various punctuation marks and you'll get more out of your reading.I would say can't read based on your critique of the substance of what I was talking about.
Read your last paragraph fool,that is about the e... (
show quote)
Man, you sure can f*ck up the English language--your grammar, syntax, punctuation, and spelling are 3rd grade level. I hope to hell you don't talk the way you write.
dongreen76 wrote:
Read your last paragraph fool,that is about the extent I'm and running sentences together. No,Donald Trump is not that big of a fool,he don't want you to pay for it.Reproduction rights are discussions pertaining to whether or not we should permit americans to abort pregnancies. [ that means when a woman is having a baby,do we let her destroy it before it is born.]Let me see what other fool ass iliterate shit did you find an issue with.Oh yes,after all that hoopla,all those discussions going on about a year while he was campaigning;like two lovers repertoire,"Cause he said sum'un nice bout'me".you say there is not a cordial rapport between the two,not to mention he has business interest in russia.People have been discussing this for over a year.Finally, are you one of those gender of a third kind. P S. I use an a -bundance of coordinating conjunctions,and preposition, as you did in your last paragraph.I also offset that -correctly with a semi-colon,because in my mind that is one complete thought; for
instance;The sentence above [ I also offset that ,-correctly with a semi-colon.]I couldn't start a sentence off with" I also offset.....that would be a fragmented sentence,a dependent clause,dependent on the pryor sentence that tells what I why I'm talking about offsetting something with a semi-colon; you should learn how to read the various punctuation marks and you'll get more out of your reading.I would say you can't read based on your critique of the substance of what I was talking about.
Read your last paragraph fool,that is about the e... (
show quote)
"Rights" have now become "discussions"?
Victor Borge developed this method of punctuation especially for people like you, who have reading problems: (There's nothing wrong with your ears, is there?)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7BXPKyikB0
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
