Chuckie Schumer and the "Dog Whistle" Democrats: FTA In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow on the MSNBC network, Sen. Charles Schumer, who is the Minority Leader in the U.S. Senate...

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

FTA
In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow on the MSNBC network, Sen. Charles Schumer, who is the Minority Leader in the U.S. Senate, recently hinted darkly that the federal intelligence agencies could decide to harm Donald Trump. He told an approving Maddow:

Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you, So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he is being really dumb to do this.

The article continues:

Schumer said he didn’t know what agents would or could do to Trump. “But from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them,” he said.

The Left often likes to speak of “dog whistles” put out by Republicans when they speak, leftists claiming what is said seems to have one meaning, but actually, is said in order to “signal” other groups covertly about what the politician really believes about a certain subject. For example, if a Republican politician says he believes in “states’ rights,” or a federal system of government in which individual states have delegated powers not given to the federal government, the Left claims he actually is letting white supremacists know that he supports oppression of black people and wants whites to lynch blacks. It doesn’t matter that a federal system which gives state governmental bodies the opportunity to resist federal policies is a bulwark against tyranny. To oppose the federal government is to endorse racist violence, period, according to the Left.

The Left claims that an appeal to “states’ rights” is a “dog whistle,” something that only certain people can hear and understand the actual meaning of the statement. However, it seems that Democrats now are putting out “dog whistles” of their own. As I see it, Schumer put out a “dog whistle” with his statements to Maddow, calling for the CIA at least to politically harm Donald Trump, if not to assassinate him.

Instead, his comments – and the look on his face when he makes them – demonstrate that he approves of whatever the CIA and NSA might do to Trump. He is not signaling alarm at the behavior of agencies that supposedly are under authority; instead, he seems to relish the prospects of the secret police doing away with the Democrats’ political opposition.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And democrats are too stupid to grasp why they are so disliked by the right. HELLO!!!!!!! We dislike you because you have no souls, no conscience, no morals, no humaneness, no honor, no true human attributes. You are self-centered, hateful, nasty, amoral, spiteful, and tyrannical. NO decent human likes you. Your best friend may like you, but he is ONE OF YOUR KIND - self-centered, hateful, nasty, etc.

Read more at: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/01/william-l-anderson/chuck-schumer-dog-whistle-assassination/

robmull Loc: florida

Tasine wrote:

FTA
In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow on the MSNBC network, Sen. Charles Schumer, who is the Minority Leader in the U.S. Senate, recently hinted darkly that the federal intelligence agencies could decide to harm Donald Trump. He told an approving Maddow:

Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you, So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he is being really dumb to do this.

The article continues:

Schumer said he didn’t know what agents would or could do to Trump. “But from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them,” he said.

The Left often likes to speak of “dog whistles” put out by Republicans when they speak, leftists claiming what is said seems to have one meaning, but actually, is said in order to “signal” other groups covertly about what the politician really believes about a certain subject. For example, if a Republican politician says he believes in “states’ rights,” or a federal system of government in which individual states have delegated powers not given to the federal government, the Left claims he actually is letting white supremacists know that he supports oppression of black people and wants whites to lynch blacks. It doesn’t matter that a federal system which gives state governmental bodies the opportunity to resist federal policies is a bulwark against tyranny. To oppose the federal government is to endorse racist violence, period, according to the Left.

The Left claims that an appeal to “states’ rights” is a “dog whistle,” something that only certain people can hear and understand the actual meaning of the statement. However, it seems that Democrats now are putting out “dog whistles” of their own. As I see it, Schumer put out a “dog whistle” with his statements to Maddow, calling for the CIA at least to politically harm Donald Trump, if not to assassinate him.

Instead, his comments – and the look on his face when he makes them – demonstrate that he approves of whatever the CIA and NSA might do to Trump. He is not signaling alarm at the behavior of agencies that supposedly are under authority; instead, he seems to relish the prospects of the secret police doing away with the Democrats’ political opposition.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And democrats are too stupid to grasp why they are so disliked by the right. HELLO!!!!!!! We dislike you because you have no souls, no conscience, no morals, no humaneness, no honor, no true human attributes. You are self-centered, hateful, nasty, amoral, spiteful, and tyrannical. NO decent human likes you. Your best friend may like you, but he is ONE OF YOUR KIND - self-centered, hateful, nasty, etc.

Read more at: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/01/william-l-anderson/chuck-schumer-dog-whistle-assassination/

FTA br In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow on... (show quote)

What "Madsow" and Schumer, {and MOST agenda-(D)riven "lefties"} seem to do, Tasine, is avoid the truth. Not just the head of the current POTUS has been (D)ismembered, but the heads of every organization {and military Senior positions} that had been un-vetted and "appointed" by the current unceremoniously electively (D)ecapitated snake. True, the mindless "useful-idiot" anarchist/communist fan-base {body and tail}, will continue to flail around our "Shining Light..." as a natural reflex-reaction "(D)eath rattle," 'til dawn; January 21, 2017!!! But the Intelligence organizations are saturated with "WE THE PEOPLE," and are ITCHING to get back into-the-light and to prove the current administration and their "lap-dog, state-run, alphabet channel" MSM, should be investigated under-the-authorization of American POTUS "45," Trump; a true American patriotic Constitutionalist conservative. The (D)efeat of Hillary {BHO's 3rd term} was (D)evistating to their "fundamental transformation" agenda, and had lost power years ago; and are now grabbing at ANY straw that they pass on their mandated way (D)own, (D)own, (D)own. Everything that "Barry" has done in the past "occupation," will be "reversed over a long weekend" {Art Laffer - leading conservative world Economist}. "Over a long weekend!!!" Hummmmmmmmmmmm. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP!!!

Mike Papa

Name names or shut the hell up, WHAT I'M TOLD?????. WHO???

robmull Loc: florida

Mike Papa wrote:

Name names or shut the hell up, WHAT I'M TOLD?????. WHO???

Who was that directed at, MP? GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP!!!

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Mike Papa wrote:

Name names or shut the hell up, WHAT I'M TOLD?????. WHO???

1)Who are you talking to?
2)What are you trying to say?
3)Your comment cannot be translated into meaningful English.
4)If you want to make a statement, make it so that people can interpret your "sentences".

robmull Loc: florida

Tasine wrote:

1)Who are you talking to?
2)What are you trying to say?
3)Your comment cannot be translated into meaningful English.
4)If you want to make a statement, make it so that people can interpret your "sentences".

Perhaps English is not Mike's first language, Tasine. "WE" will see. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. TRUMP!!!

Ricko Loc: Florida

Tasine wrote:

FTA
In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow on the MSNBC network, Sen. Charles Schumer, who is the Minority Leader in the U.S. Senate, recently hinted darkly that the federal intelligence agencies could decide to harm Donald Trump. He told an approving Maddow:

Let me tell you, you take on the intelligence community, they have six ways from Sunday to get back at you, So, even for a practical, supposedly hard-nosed businessman, he is being really dumb to do this.

The article continues:

Schumer said he didn’t know what agents would or could do to Trump. “But from what I am told, they are very upset with how he has treated them and talked about them,” he said.

The Left often likes to speak of “dog whistles” put out by Republicans when they speak, leftists claiming what is said seems to have one meaning, but actually, is said in order to “signal” other groups covertly about what the politician really believes about a certain subject. For example, if a Republican politician says he believes in “states’ rights,” or a federal system of government in which individual states have delegated powers not given to the federal government, the Left claims he actually is letting white supremacists know that he supports oppression of black people and wants whites to lynch blacks. It doesn’t matter that a federal system which gives state governmental bodies the opportunity to resist federal policies is a bulwark against tyranny. To oppose the federal government is to endorse racist violence, period, according to the Left.

The Left claims that an appeal to “states’ rights” is a “dog whistle,” something that only certain people can hear and understand the actual meaning of the statement. However, it seems that Democrats now are putting out “dog whistles” of their own. As I see it, Schumer put out a “dog whistle” with his statements to Maddow, calling for the CIA at least to politically harm Donald Trump, if not to assassinate him.

Instead, his comments – and the look on his face when he makes them – demonstrate that he approves of whatever the CIA and NSA might do to Trump. He is not signaling alarm at the behavior of agencies that supposedly are under authority; instead, he seems to relish the prospects of the secret police doing away with the Democrats’ political opposition.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And democrats are too stupid to grasp why they are so disliked by the right. HELLO!!!!!!! We dislike you because you have no souls, no conscience, no morals, no humaneness, no honor, no true human attributes. You are self-centered, hateful, nasty, amoral, spiteful, and tyrannical. NO decent human likes you. Your best friend may like you, but he is ONE OF YOUR KIND - self-centered, hateful, nasty, etc.

Read more at: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2017/01/william-l-anderson/chuck-schumer-dog-whistle-assassination/

FTA br In a recent interview with Rachel Maddow on... (show quote)

Tasine-so Chuckie Boys' recommendation is that Trump keep quiet about fake news being included in an intel report.
Someone at one or more of those agencies has a big mouth which he/she cannot keep shut. Therefore, before he/she does any real harm to the country, it behooves Trump to find out who these people are and show them the exit. These blabber mouths do not represent the intel community as a whole and their actions cast a pall on everyone in those agencies. Until these scoundrels are routed out, everyone is suspect which is unfair to the majority who are loyal, hard working Americans. Good Luck America !!!

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

Ricko wrote:

Tasine-so Chuckie Boys' recommendation is that Tru... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I wonder if these idiotic leftist loons have a CLUE as to what they are inviting, not just you and me, but for themselves as well.