ACCOUNTABILITY
Jan 10, 2017 03:15:42 #
whole2th wrote:
Creating new lies is difficult for you as you seem to have few sources to reply upon.
Here are hundreds of reasons (hundreds of sources) proving it wasn't muslims who did 9-11: http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm
Controlled demolition (pre-planned and placed explosives) is now a scientific fact.
http://ae911truth.org
Here are hundreds of reasons (hundreds of sources) proving it wasn't muslims who did 9-11: http://www.takeourworldback.com/itwasntmuslims.htm
Controlled demolition (pre-planned and placed explosives) is now a scientific fact.
http://ae911truth.org
I don't have few sources. The fact you believe their are few sources is a testament that you have never actually "researched " in order to know the truth. Having only watched youtu.be videos, or pro ideology articles and formed your false beliefs, narrative.
You are perhaps one of the most dishonest person on this forum, and king of liars.
Sheeple, follower also come to mind.
Go do some real research, then you won't be making stupid comments of "sources". Once you realize the hundreds of "expert " and empirical evidence. Then post the truth.....
The only problem I see is, idiots like yourself are incapable of evaluating evidence that does not fit with their ideologies and if your honest to yourself, admit you "google" for supporting information by asking "google " questions that will pull information you "want" Google to pull. Be honest and ask Google opposition views.
Until then, your only a lying jackass
Jan 10, 2017 05:04:19 #
PoppaGringo wrote:
You win first prize, hands down, for gullibility, or is it for stupidity?
You win first prize, hands down, for gullibility, or is it for stupidity?You win no prize and also lose this debate.
Jan 10, 2017 09:48:49 #
Noraa
Loc: Kansas
whole2th wrote:
You win no prize and also lose this debate.
You sound like a 5 year old . Sorry! A 5 year old is way smarter than you.
Jan 10, 2017 11:05:28 #
Noraa wrote:
You sound like a 5 year old . Sorry! A 5 year old ... (show quote)
Your viewpoint arises in already knowing it all--and not looking more in depth.
"Obama, the muslim" is a canard.
Can you tell us what a 'canard' is?
Jan 10, 2017 12:04:54 #
Noraa
Loc: Kansas
whole2th wrote:
Your viewpoint arises in already knowing it all--and not looking more in depth.
"Obama, the muslim" is a canard.
Can you tell us what a 'canard' is?
"Obama, the muslim" is a canard.
Can you tell us what a 'canard' is?
A hoax!
Jan 10, 2017 14:11:10 #
Noraa wrote:
A hoax!
So, the idea that Obama is a muslim is a hoax.
His actions are those of a servant to zionists. Obama's meteoric rise to the Presidency was funded and encouraged by Jews.
Jan 10, 2017 16:46:07 #
Noraa
Loc: Kansas
whole2th wrote:
So, the idea that Obama is a muslim is a hoax.
His actions are those of a servant to zionists. Obama's meteoric rise to the Presidency was funded and encouraged by Jews.
His actions are those of a servant to zionists. Obama's meteoric rise to the Presidency was funded and encouraged by Jews.
HA!HA!HA!HA!
Jan 10, 2017 17:05:41 #
Noraa wrote:
HA!HA!HA!HA!
Maniacal laughter--without any rebuttal--is an admission your position is untenable.
Jan 10, 2017 17:20:24 #
whole2th wrote:
Maniacal laughter--without any rebuttal--is an admission your position is untenable.
That was a sad laugh knowing how much smarter you will need to be, just to qualify as a moron.
Jan 10, 2017 18:28:28 #
jack sequim wa wrote:
That was a sad laugh knowing how much smarter you will need to be, just to qualify as a moron.
More middle school wit?
Look at all the content you've failed to rebut.
Jan 10, 2017 21:07:54 #
whole2th wrote:
More middle school wit?
Look at all the content you've failed to rebut.
Look at all the content you've failed to rebut.
Aren't you 1000pains in mufti?
Jan 10, 2017 21:38:48 #
whole2th wrote:
More middle school wit?
Look at all the content you've failed to rebut.
Look at all the content you've failed to rebut.
You disregarded evidence in my reply, perpetuating my claim of you being dishonest, and a liar.
Seems your batting out with everyone on your post. Your dishonesty has no boundaries.
Jan 11, 2017 09:02:42 #
jack sequim wa wrote:
You disregarded evidence in my reply, perpetuating my claim of you being dishonest, and a liar.
Seems your batting out with everyone on your post. Your dishonesty has no boundaries.
Seems your batting out with everyone on your post. Your dishonesty has no boundaries.
You did not present evidence.
What you presented is official narrative--big lies.
Even the co-chairs and lead counsel to the 9-11 commission admit their product is faulty.
Senator Bob Keerey of the 9-11 commission stated they had discovered the plans for 9-11 were in the works for 30 years. This article is a summary of those plans:
http://www.bollyn.com/#article_15522 This is one of HUNDREDS of links I've posted (you have ignored) indicating it wasn't muslims who did 9-11.
It is YOU who disregards the mounds of evidence I have posted.
You are a liar and project your own failings upon me.
Jan 11, 2017 15:07:55 #
Noraa
Loc: Kansas
whole2th wrote:
You did not present evidence. br br What you pres... (show quote)
I guess it wasn't Muslims who flew the planes either?
Jan 11, 2017 16:13:11 #
Noraa wrote:
I guess it wasn't Muslims who flew the planes either?
As we know with certainty that the buildings were rigged for demolition, how can we trust any of the official narratives?
Are you aware that there are NO AIRPORT SECURITY CAMERA VIDEOS proving the alleged hijackers boarded the planes? Are you aware that the original passenger manifests failed to include the alleged hijackers--who presumably were properly registered passengers?
The only 'evidence' you have that muslims flew the planes is the official story.
The obvious controlled demolition of Building 7 puts the entire official narratives about 9-11 into question.
http://ReThink911.org
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.