One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Election Interference
Page <<first <prev 4 of 28 next> last>>
Jan 7, 2017 09:45:33   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
Kumquat, provide the proof Russia did not hack us. You and Trump must be privy to info no else has in this world. Show it! As foolish as it was to say the Russians did it, to say the didn't without proof is equally foolish. And very, very strange.

I too quickly jumped on the bandwagon of Russian hacking, simply trusting our Intelligence agencies. When no hard evidence materialized, I apologized for that unwarranted leap. Now, supposedly, evidence of that hacking has been unclassified. There appears to be proof.

You are getting very tiring with your lack of intellectual integrity. To address this usual tidbit of sophistry offered by the Right without anywhere else to go, being without facts or support: "For someone who didn't support Hillary, you are awfully upset about her loss." Please show a shred of evidence for this lie.


Do you know what the words "topic" or "subject" mean? It is conversation or comments directed in a forum to what is under discussion. Tangential posts are not necessarily out of order and can add needed insight and depth, but to condemn the topic or subject because tangential material was not presented is absurd and, again, typical Right deflection. Focus, fool. There are at least a few thousand points that could relate to this thread. Space and attention is limited. I am talking to my aunt Lilian about her sister Marion: she is the subject/topic. You interrupt to ask "What about Uncle Alfred? And Hitler? And the 1929 Stock Market crash?" Absurd!

"You never broke wind orally to complain about the 13 times that Obama executive orders were overturned by SCOTUS." Irrelevant and ridiculous but I did specifically, in these comments, say that I disagreed with a number of Obama's executive orders. Give this embarrassing attempt at deflection away. What you appear to be saying is patently absurd. One who has done wrong is excused from wrong-doing because someone has done the same or worse. "Yeah, look at Obama..." So we do not look at Trump?
Kumquat, provide the proof Russia did not hack us.... (show quote)


Once more, I will try and explain this in Very.Simple. Terms. That. You. Can. Understand. I never said, you liar, that the Russians did NOT do it. I said there was no proof that they did. There still is not, in spite of your claim that there appears to be.

You have no room to speak of intellectual integrity; you with your bullshit talk of "sedition" for the crime of disagreeing with your silly assed ideas, and your lemming like acceptance of anything and everything that Obama has done. You could write a book on misdirection except that you would get lost.
Do not speak of my lack of intellectual integrity. I may begin pointing out the myriad examples of your own. Would you like me to also include those examples offered in your other existence as Rumitoid?

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 09:51:38   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Loki wrote:
Once more, I will try and explain this in Very.Simple. Terms. That. You. Can. Understand. I never said, you liar, that the Russians did NOT do it. I said there was no proof that they did. There still is not, in spite of your claim that there appears to be.

You have no room to speak of intellectual integrity; you with your bullshit talk of "sedition" for the crime of disagreeing with your silly assed ideas, and your lemming like acceptance of anything and everything that Obama has done. You could write a book on misdirection except that you would get lost.
Do not speak of my lack of intellectual integrity. I may begin pointing out the myriad examples of your own. Would you like me to also include those examples offered in your other existence as Rumitoid?
Once more, I will try and explain this in Very.Sim... (show quote)


He is still Rumitoid and still just as mixed up, isn't he? There is a point when trying to reason is just not worth it. You would have much better luck discussing something with Norbert, Archies' goldfish

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 09:53:00   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
Lol go fuck yourself idiot. I cannot believe I once thought you were one of a very few reasonable voices on the Right. It was noteth kingeth Obama that created the report but our Intelligence agencies. Also, the false assumption I support Obama, like you falsely did with Hillary: I do not. I am appalled at his drone warfare and against many of his executive orders. But you guys cannot help but lump all different thinking people into the minions of Satan or something. Yes, there was egregious wrong-doing on the part of Hillary and the Clinton foundation, or at least that is now strongly suggested. So? Your false premise is pretty much like "if you did not dress so Provocatively, you would not have been raped." She did wrong so it is okay for Russia to attack our elections?
No one is talking about hacking "voting machines," an absurd deflection and really petty. But this is the Right's fodder: misdirection. Like holding a snowball conclusively disproves the possibility of global warming. This is how you guys think. And all sing Halleluia! Maddening!

Again, numbnutz, Hillary is not and never has been my "golden girl." More of Right Wing bullshit: lump them all into one, ugly, commie, unthinking slaves for the One World Order. I take you as you present yourself, not by labels or pre-suppositions. Only what you say is addressed and nothing presumed. And what you say is very disappointing.

I did not vote for Obama or Hillary. I do not care for either one. To make a case against what I say by not addressing what I say but rather by guilt of association, where there is none, is very sad.

I am not above feeling self-righteous; it is a constant problem talking with people like you. It is a fight I lose occasionally. Become a jerk. You noted once where I apologized for that, about the hacking, but there are more. I detest more than anything being labeled, as you did. I got very pissed. I un-fuck yourself officially.
Lol go fuck yourself idiot. I cannot believe I onc... (show quote)


There ya go ,, good job !! when you can not win a argument the insults fly ,, speaking of flies ,, How is Beelezbub ??



Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2017 09:54:52   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Loki wrote:
Once more, I will try and explain this in Very.Simple. Terms. That. You. Can. Understand. I never said, you liar, that the Russians did NOT do it. I said there was no proof that they did. There still is not, in spite of your claim that there appears to be.

You have no room to speak of intellectual integrity; you with your bullshit talk of "sedition" for the crime of disagreeing with your silly assed ideas, and your lemming like acceptance of anything and everything that Obama has done. You could write a book on misdirection except that you would get lost.
Do not speak of my lack of intellectual integrity. I may begin pointing out the myriad examples of your own. Would you like me to also include those examples offered in your other existence as Rumitoid?
Once more, I will try and explain this in Very.Sim... (show quote)


There is no proof that they DID do it. It seems to me that he thinks we should be pissed at them because there is no proof that they DIDN'T do it. WTF? This dude wastes a lot of .50 cent words to make no sense at all.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 09:56:01   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
ACP45 wrote:
No Comment Needed!



Reply
Jan 7, 2017 10:08:44   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
archie bunker wrote:
There is no proof that they DID do it. It seems to me that he thinks we should be pissed at them because there is no proof that they DIDN'T do it. WTF? This dude wastes a lot of .50 cent words to make no sense at all.


His fifty cent words are only his two cents worth once they are adjusted for inflation.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 10:19:09   #
maureenthannon
 
It's been reported thatthe FBI didn't look into the supposed Russian hacking of the DND election, they took the word of some one who told them. There is no proof. Status quo for the pst 8 years. The problem isn't who got the e-mails, it's that top secret gstate department business was put online on an unsecured website that ANY ONE

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2017 10:23:24   #
Kachina
 
I still don't see the point here. Maybe they tried, maybe they didn't. I am sure China, north Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia and others probably tried too, but they would have been pushing for Hillary so that is ok I guess. Not like we haven't been accused of doing the same thing. Heck, we basically put who we wanted in charge of Iraq, while pretending he was actually elected . Look where our interference there got us.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 10:35:53   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
All dog's are democrats . Bunch of liars .
Just ask your dog if they are bad . Mine
denies being bad 100% of the time.
Yup
I am harboring a democrat .



ACP45 wrote:
No Comment Needed!

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 10:38:26   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
The ends justify the means to these bottom feeders.

no propaganda please wrote:
the left chooses to ignore the Clinton Foundation influence and payola, because they seem to think that payola and fraud is only important when the Republicans do it. They may be correct in that the entire Democrat party is based and centered in fraud and payola.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 10:51:25   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Dr.Ross, I agree with you. Listening to the news this morning, I noticed that after meeting with the leaders of our intelligence community, Trump praised it, but still refuses to put the blame where it belongs, ON PUTIN. With Trump, it's all about the Donald, and the nations national security comes second. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I have no idea why so many Americans voted for Trump. The only thing he has ever said that has a degree of truth is that he could shoot people on 5th Av. and nobody would say anything bad about him. I agree with Sen. Graham, it's time to throw rocks, not pebbles! I never thought I would ever agree with the senior Senator from South Carolina, but I do now.
I would place a division of troops right on the Ukrainian- Russian border and other sensitive spots . I would also put more economic sanctions on Russia and revive Radio Free Europe to give the Russian people a more truthful and realistic viewpoint of our country, and policies. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump gives Putin the Medal of Freedom!
Dr.Dross wrote:
This is so ridiculous. Fine! Match apples and oranges. Both fruits so they are the same. Where the hell is your logic? Obama was terrible so give Russia a pass? It is very hard to respond to the poverty of your thinking on this. New unclassified documents point to Russia.
Why this resistance to the possibility?
Why such stupid sarcasm as "Those mean old Russians" without a shred of evidence showing their innocence?
How do you know how much or not the hacking influenced the election? Polling numbers? Personal interviews?
You pathetic creatures cannot think of anything else than this is all a plot to undermine the extremely minor victory of Trump. Butt-hurt? That's as deep as your thinking goes.
What if Russia did the hacking? Rather than hold them accountable for this attack on our country, you would rather indict America for "our dirty tricks"?
What is this love obsession with Russia?
This is so ridiculous. Fine! Match apples and oran... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jan 7, 2017 10:52:46   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
Let me get the gist of what your are saying (trying to ignore your emblem of ignorance and hate). The Democrats never used the "the Russian hack story in an attempt to damage the nascent Trump presidency." They never accused Trump or the Republicans either.

A question: if the government came to you and asked to scour your computer for possible breaches, honestly, would you say "Fell free"? I have no idea whether your representation of what happened with the DNC and FBI happened or happened as you said; a source would have been good here.

There are so many gaping holes in your arguments it is hard to know which to address next. Let's start here: "Was the report commissioned purely for campaign purposes? Was the report done independent of DNC input, or did members of the party and the campaign direct Crowdstrike toward the Russians?" Bizarre thought: send a probably damaging Crowdstrike report to the Russians.

No, not going to satisfy this blindness any longer; your whole post is as ridiculous as almost all I have read so far. If you had the eyes to see what you said, in effect, is the rapist defense: "if she was wearing such provocative clothes..." Russia is free to interfere with our democratic process and tilt the scales for Trump because Hillary a "nastywoman"?
Let me get the gist of what your are saying (tryin... (show quote)


As for my avatar, that offends your delicate little snowflake sensibilities, I am proud of my Texas and Southern hereitage. My great grandfather joined the First Texas Heavy Artillery Unit, Company K of the Texas Confederate Army in 1861 at the ripe old age of 12. So, you can kiss my ass.

As for sources:

http://hotair.com/archives/2017/01/05/hmmm-fbi-never-examined-dnc-servers/

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/fbi-never-examined-dnc-servers-russian-hacks/

http://www.mediaite.com/online/report-dnc-delayed-hacking-investigation-by-rebuffing-fbis-request-to-examine-servers/

Certainly appears like the Obama administration, FBI, and the intelligence community didn’t care about it enough to act until the results of the election embarrassed the White House.

The DNC may not have used the Russian hack story to damage Trump, but it is glaringly evident by what was exposed in the emails that the DNC was trying to trying to hyjack Trump and his campaign. Idiot!

'Jason Healey, a senior cyber security expert at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, does not believe the Russian government is trying to influence the outcome of a U.S. presidential election.

"I think it is just classic intelligence-gathering to find out more about Trump, and how you throw him off his game," said Healy, a former director of White House Critical Infrastructure Protection.

He said the DNC's opposition research on Trump would be the big prize for the hackers.

"It gives you an opportunity to get all this information without having to go out and get it yourself."

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/06/14/russia-hack-democratic-national-committee-trump/85867116/

Why did the DNC refuse to let US intel agencies investigate and review their servers and data in the first place? What WAS the DNC hiding/ A foreign hacking should have been conducted as a criminal investigation with supenoas and all.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 10:54:04   #
Alber
 
Whomever made known the Emails of Hillary Clinton's campaing did a favor to the American people. If the Russians did it, is a shame for Obama's administration, now Trump knows the necessity of making changes in the USA intelligence equipment. Anyway the actual intelligence equipment, assuming the guilt for a bad work, is helping his master declaring what he wants to hear. I think that there was a leak by somebody, we must remember that someone working for the NDC with a high rank was shot and died mysteriously, without an explanation about what happened to this man. Nobody says that the voting machines were hacked, maybe they were manipulated in someplace and that is an inside work not chargeable to Trump or the Russians. We must remember what happened in the primaries in California where madame Clinton was accused of cheating by the people of Bernie Sander. It was very suspicious that the polls were always favorable to Hillary and she had meetings of hundreds when Trump had meetings of thousands. Who knows if somebody was planning a great manipulation of the machines but something went wrong and the media was helping to the deceit. Hillary has lost the elections several times. first in elections day, second with the recount supportig the greens and third in the Electoral College. I think that if Trump orders an investigación of the elections in California, Illinois and New York, it will demonstrate that there were millions of fraudulent votes on Hillary's name and she will lost the election four times. There are news of fraud in Nevada where she won.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 11:16:10   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Dr.Ross, I agree with you. Listening to the news this morning, I noticed that after meeting with the leaders of our intelligence community, Trump praised it, but still refuses to put the blame where it belongs, ON PUTIN. With Trump, it's all about the Donald, and the nations national security comes second. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I have no idea why so many Americans voted for Trump. The only thing he has ever said that has a degree of truth is that he could shoot people on 5th Av. and nobody would say anything bad about him. I agree with Sen. Graham, it's time to throw rocks, not pebbles! I never thought I would ever agree with the senior Senator from South Carolina, but I do now.
I would place a division of troops right on the Ukrainian- Russian border and other sensitive spots . I would also put more economic sanctions on Russia and revive Radio Free Europe to give the Russian people a more truthful and realistic viewpoint of our country, and policies. I wouldn't be surprised if Trump gives Putin the Medal of Freedom!
Dr.Ross, I agree with you. Listening to the news t... (show quote)



Saltwind you have his name wrong, it is not Dr. Ross but Dross as in :
Dregs, - Impurity, - Lees; - Refuse, - Scoria, - Scum, - Sediment, - Slag, - Trash, - Waste, - Recrement, - Scobs, - Sinter, - Debris, - Litter, - Waste, - Bits, - Crap, - Ca- Ca, - Detritus, - Dregs, - Fragments, - Garbage, - Junk, - Offal, - Orts,, - Pieces, - Refuse, - Remains, - Riffraff, - Rubbish, - Rubble, - Ruins, - Smeg, - Trash, - Wreck, - Wreckage.

your foreign policy of sabre rattling is being carried out by NATO at this time and Russia's response has been to deploy tactical nukes on their side of the border. Isn't that nice, if someone farts that area of the world will light up.

Reply
Jan 7, 2017 12:15:35   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
missinglink wrote:
All dog's are democrats . Bunch of liars .
Just ask your dog if they are bad . Mine
denies being bad 100% of the time.
Yup
I am harboring a democrat .


...................................................Democrat Dog ??..........................................



Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 28 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.