One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Obama ignores nullification: Says federal agents will enforce ACA
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 26, 2013 00:20:43   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
I think I may have found why DHS has bought up all that ammo and the MRAP vehicles. Yes, they intend to enforce Obamacare with force in states that want to live by the Constitution. Obama never has wanted to live by the Constitution and especially the 10th Amendment. No wonder he thinks he has to blow out the 10th Amendment after he manages to blow out the 2nd one. I would say that we are finding out some new parts of the Constitution he doesn't like every week.

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/03/obama-ignores-nullification-says-federal-agents-will-enforce-obamacare/

Reply
Mar 26, 2013 07:59:53   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
It seems to me that every thing Obama does points to his desire to become the tyrannical dictator we know he is practicing to be. He came into office hating America and he is a stubborn amoral sociopath in love only with himself. The longer this farce of an "Administration" goes on, the clearer it becomes to me that he is merely the tool the socialists and the Middle East are using to destroy the U.S. On his own, he simply is not intelligent enough to make all this happen. He was helped BIG TIME in his quest to own the world - I think he is going to receive a HUGE surprise once his handlers are done with him, and I think it won't be a pleasant surprise.

I think Obama's terms in office are the grandchildren of George Soros and Bill Ayers, and I think someone or some nation in the Middle East is a co-conspirator in the take-down of America. Soros, Ayers, Obama, and the Middle East share the hatred of America, which in my book, colors all of them absolutely insane. Everyone of them can usually get what they want through brute force, as most people could if they had the money and the lack of conscience that all socialists have without knowing it.

Obama, the dictator
Obama, the dictator...

Obama's neglect
Obama's neglect...

Reply
Mar 26, 2013 18:42:26   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Tasine wrote:
It seems to me that every thing Obama does points to his desire to become the tyrannical dictator we know he is practicing to be. He came into office hating America and he is a stubborn amoral sociopath in love only with himself. The longer this farce of an "Administration" goes on, the clearer it becomes to me that he is merely the tool the socialists and the Middle East are using to destroy the U.S. On his own, he simply is not intelligent enough to make all this happen. He was helped BIG TIME in his quest to own the world - I think he is going to receive a HUGE surprise once his handlers are done with him, and I think it won't be a pleasant surprise.

I think Obama's terms in office are the grandchildren of George Soros and Bill Ayers, and I think someone or some nation in the Middle East is a co-conspirator in the take-down of America. Soros, Ayers, Obama, and the Middle East share the hatred of America, which in my book, colors all of them absolutely insane. Everyone of them can usually get what they want through brute force, as most people could if they had the money and the lack of conscience that all socialists have without knowing it.
It seems to me that every thing Obama does points ... (show quote)


Wow did you get in one good swing at I Won with that post. I guess I feel that way because we agree on all of it.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 14:16:27   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
I just have to wonder if many here know what ACA stands for or what nullification is and has to do with Obamascare. ACA is what the Dems shorten Obamascare down to be or Affordable Care Act. It won't be very affordable but some don't seem to understand why that is true.

Nullification has to do with Amendment 10 which states that the States are reserved all powers not granted to the United States. Now we have to be questioning Obamascare since there is nothing in the Constitution that allows Congress to create something like that. The States largely are backing off from allowing the feds to control health insurance, but Obama is plowing bravely ahead in his attempt to destroy the Constitution, one part at a time. When the 10th Amendment goes the States will become nothing but regional offices of the national government.

WAKE UP, people. They are getting at us in ways most of us don't see because many of us don't want to see it happening.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 15:53:29   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
"WAKE UP, people. They are getting at us in ways most of us don't see because many of us don't want to see it happening."

Truer words were never written or said. Bear in mind that they have been getting at us for decades, and we are just now seeing the worst results so far, but ......... they have MUCH MORE in store for us. To observe signs may be considered "conspiricist", and to ignore those signs may be horribly ignorant. Better to be prepared and have nothing horrible happen than to have something horrible happen and you don't have one solitary plan in mind. People like that will be the first ones to die if violence hits us - aside from the violence that has already come our way, compliments of the U.S. government.

Allah money
Allah money...

Rules for Radicals
Rules for Radicals...

Bumps in the Road
Bumps in the Road...

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 18:19:40   #
Poco624
 
You right-wingers should be thanking President Obama for not having your "Golden Boy" George W. Bush prosecuted for war crimes. When Obama started his presidency in January 2009, he was asked if he wanted to prosecute the Bush officials, which included Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld for war crimes, Obama declined saying it was time for reflection not retribution. Mr. Bush is now our only former president who can not leave the US for fear of being arrested.

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 20:01:35   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Poco624 wrote:
You right-wingers should be thanking President Obama for not having your "Golden Boy" George W. Bush prosecuted for war crimes. When Obama started his presidency in January 2009, he was asked if he wanted to prosecute the Bush officials, which included Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld for war crimes, Obama declined saying it was time for reflection not retribution. Mr. Bush is now our only former president who can not leave the US for fear of being arrested.


Of course, most of the others are old enough that they probably don't want to leave anyway.

Your words about those war crimes make me want to puke, but then it is just that you fail to see what has gone on with the extension of Afghanistan, the war that Obama took over for his own when he sent the extra troops to end it upon entering the office. When will we be holding his trial?

Reply
Mar 27, 2013 20:03:36   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Tasine wrote:
"WAKE UP, people. They are getting at us in ways most of us don't see because many of us don't want to see it happening."

Truer words were never written or said. Bear in mind that they have been getting at us for decades, and we are just now seeing the worst results so far, but ......... they have MUCH MORE in store for us. To observe signs may be considered "conspiricist", and to ignore those signs may be horribly ignorant. Better to be prepared and have nothing horrible happen than to have something horrible happen and you don't have one solitary plan in mind. People like that will be the first ones to die if violence hits us - aside from the violence that has already come our way, compliments of the U.S. government.
"WAKE UP, people. They are getting at us in w... (show quote)


Such a grand collection of things for us to worry about. Especially the one about Obama and those Constitutional bumps in the road.

Reply
Mar 28, 2013 06:51:23   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Poco, Open you eyes, rev up your brain, join the party, and knock off the hatred of Bush. You can USE him to try to protect your wasted "President", but all it does is to make YOU look as ignorant as you probably are. You may "think" you are safe and okey-dokey with this blob of cells in the White Hosue, but you are in as much danger from his idiocy as the rest of us are. You are NOTHING to him. He isn't on your side. He is on the Obama side, no one else's. Defending him is identical to defending Lucifer. You have blindly chosen the wrong side to protect.

Reply
Mar 28, 2013 07:02:49   #
Poco624
 
Google 'The Deafness Before the Storm' to see the biggest cover up in history. September 11, 2001.

The Bush administration was told as early as May 1, 2001, about the threat of an attack by Al Qaeda. They were told that Al Qaeda would be using airplanes. This leaves people wondering if George W. Bush was waiting for a 'flight plan' from Osama bin Laden.

On August 6, 2001, President Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Al Qaeda. That brief featured the now infamous heading.
"Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"

A few weeks later, on 9/11 Al Qaeda accomplished their goal.

Reply
Mar 28, 2013 08:31:10   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Poco624 wrote:
Google 'The Deafness Before the Storm' to see the biggest cover up in history. September 11, 2001.

The Bush administration was told as early as May 1, 2001, about the threat of an attack by Al Qaeda. They were told that Al Qaeda would be using airplanes. This leaves people wondering if George W. Bush was waiting for a 'flight plan' from Osama bin Laden.

On August 6, 2001, President Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Al Qaeda. That brief featured the now infamous heading.
"Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"

A few weeks later, on 9/11 Al Qaeda accomplished their goal.
Google 'The Deafness Before the Storm' to see the ... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did he know where they were going to strike?
Did he know where to find the ones who were going to strike?
Could Bush have prevented the crashes? How? Be exact - everybody can claim they could have been prevented - but let's hear HOW? Maybe you think he should have bombed the entire Middle East?

Since all the terrorists in the planes were surreptitiously in the US, maybe you think Bush should have stopped them even if he didn't know who or where they were? Yet I"ll bet you don't argue that Obama is wrong to totally open all our borders, thereby enabling all the terrorists to a cakewalk to come over here to kill us. Sorta like Obama's setting up Benghazi and refusing to listen to American's pleas for help, thereby this Administration got several Americans killed off. How many Americans Obama has gotten killed with "Fast and Furious" we will never know. We do know he got a Border Patrolman killed.

You want to point fingers, let's go to it!!! I'm ready to have the rubber hit the pavement. It's high time we started really talking about HIGH CRIMES, forget misdemeanors, that the current Obama Administration has committed, the worst one being treason. Every death that has occurred on Obama's watch has been the result in either total incompetence or by evil willingness to allow AMERICANS to needlessly die. I'd think that would stick in your craw. Why doesn't it?

Is Bush more to blame than Clinton who was offered bin Laden on a platter and turned down the offer? A leftist too chicken to receive a terrorist without having to place anyone in harm's way. He was too busy being serviced in the Oval Office by a child named "Monica" to waste time on saving American lives. That was O.K., though, because he always carried his Bible to church for show. Now THERE is a deadly President for you to carp about. Clinton COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11, but chose not to get his hands dirty. Bush had to do it the hard way - he did it, and we've not had a real terrorist attack on our soil since then. Thanks to President Bush and the US troops. Thanks to NO ONE ELSE. Go carp about Bush to one of your idiot friends. I'll have no part of your hatred of Bush which is based on N O T H I N G.

How many in Congress refused to authorize the "war on terror"? How many knew where to find the terrorists?

Once YOU can answer every one of these questions satisfactorily, I may listen to you. Until then I"ll consider you full of hot air and very little else. You just want to carp about Bush while giving your boys a clear path to total destruction of our nation.

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2013 12:01:03   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Poco624 wrote:
Google 'The Deafness Before the Storm' to see the biggest cover up in history. September 11, 2001.

The Bush administration was told as early as May 1, 2001, about the threat of an attack by Al Qaeda. They were told that Al Qaeda would be using airplanes. This leaves people wondering if George W. Bush was waiting for a 'flight plan' from Osama bin Laden.

On August 6, 2001, President Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Al Qaeda. That brief featured the now infamous heading.
"Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"

A few weeks later, on 9/11 Al Qaeda accomplished their goal.
Google 'The Deafness Before the Storm' to see the ... (show quote)


Can you point out what the location of the al Qaeda attack was listed at? It is a long way from New York City to LA and I don't believe that any of your reports say a damned thing about location other than the US, and that takes in a lot of territory.

Reply
Mar 28, 2013 12:13:47   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Did he know where they were going to strike?
Did he know where to find the ones who were going to strike?
Could Bush have prevented the crashes? How? Be exact - everybody can claim they could have been prevented - but let's hear HOW? Maybe you think he should have bombed the entire Middle East?

Since all the terrorists in the planes were surreptitiously in the US, maybe you think Bush should have stopped them even if he didn't know who or where they were? Yet I"ll bet you don't argue that Obama is wrong to totally open all our borders, thereby enabling all the terrorists to a cakewalk to come over here to kill us. Sorta like Obama's setting up Benghazi and refusing to listen to American's pleas for help, thereby this Administration got several Americans killed off. How many Americans Obama has gotten killed with "Fast and Furious" we will never know. We do know he got a Border Patrolman killed.

You want to point fingers, let's go to it!!! I'm ready to have the rubber hit the pavement. It's high time we started really talking about HIGH CRIMES, forget misdemeanors, that the current Obama Administration has committed, the worst one being treason. Every death that has occurred on Obama's watch has been the result in either total incompetence or by evil willingness to allow AMERICANS to needlessly die. I'd think that would stick in your craw. Why doesn't it?

Is Bush more to blame than Clinton who was offered bin Laden on a platter and turned down the offer? A leftist too chicken to receive a terrorist without having to place anyone in harm's way. He was too busy being serviced in the Oval Office by a child named "Monica" to waste time on saving American lives. That was O.K., though, because he always carried his Bible to church for show. Now THERE is a deadly President for you to carp about. Clinton COULD HAVE PREVENTED 9/11, but chose not to get his hands dirty. Bush had to do it the hard way - he did it, and we've not had a real terrorist attack on our soil since then. Thanks to President Bush and the US troops. Thanks to NO ONE ELSE. Go carp about Bush to one of your idiot friends. I'll have no part of your hatred of Bush which is based on N O T H I N G.

How many in Congress refused to authorize the "war on terror"? How many knew where to find the terrorists?

Once YOU can answer every one of these questions satisfactorily, I may listen to you. Until then I"ll consider you full of hot air and very little else. You just want to carp about Bush while giving your boys a clear path to total destruction of our nation.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ br Did he know where they were ... (show quote)


You have been firm but too nice to this left leaner. Maybe you should have asked for something serious about the location of 5 of our nuclear aircraft carriers. They have been, and may still be, parked in Norfolk Naval Base for too long. I wonder how many lefties know how long FDR had the entire Pacific fleet parked in Pearl Harbor every weekend for months. I wonder if they know what happened on that day, December 7, 1941, the day that will live forever in Infamy, said FDR after the attack. I wonder if they have any idea why he kept the carriers at sea and how important that turned out to be. I wonder if they have any idea about the outstanding target for the next attack terrorist inspired or nationally carried out these carriers make sitting there helplessly like sitting ducks.

What do we do about it if somebody destroys 3 or all of them any day now? How do we get a trial going for the Glorious Leader giving the order to have them there because of Sequester? They are there but I failed to get the Google picture to appear here.

Reply
Mar 28, 2013 12:53:37   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
@Roy, "I wonder if they have any idea about the outstanding target for the next attack terrorist inspired or nationally carried out these carriers make sitting there helplessly like sitting ducks.

What do we do about it if somebody destroys 3 or all of them any day now? How do we get a trial going for the Glorious Leader giving the order to have them there because of Sequester? They are there but I failed to get the Google picture to appear here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not sure this is the photo you had in mind, but I believe it is the one I saw recently:

ships bunched into a group invite trouble
ships bunched into a group invite trouble...

Reply
Mar 28, 2013 13:02:57   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Tasine wrote:
@Roy, "I wonder if they have any idea about the outstanding target for the next attack terrorist inspired or nationally carried out these carriers make sitting there helplessly like sitting ducks.

What do we do about it if somebody destroys 3 or all of them any day now? How do we get a trial going for the Glorious Leader giving the order to have them there because of Sequester? They are there but I failed to get the Google picture to appear here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not sure this is the photo you had in mind, but I believe it is the one I saw recently:
@Roy, "I wonder if they have any idea about ... (show quote)


That is the very one I was talking about. I don't have the expertise needed to post things like that.

I wonder how many Obama supporters know he violated naval orders when he put those very important ships in that one place at one time. Not since December 7, 1941 has anything so stupid been done, so I have to assume that he did it on purpose. What a foolish Commander in Chief.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.