One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Let us end this silliness: What does "infringe" mean?
Page <<first <prev 11 of 12 next>
Jan 5, 2017 12:32:37   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
permafrost wrote:
Why is it that you Russia lovers do not seem to feel awkward callling other people communists??


There is a difference between being a Russia lover and cautious of their leadership. Do you hate the Russian people? Where Russia is more intelligent than you Marxist Progressives here in America is found in that which Putin chided Obama about communism. Basically he said, "You idiot! We tried Communism and it didn't work." He saw more clearly than you Progressives where Obama was leading you.....not me or those who elected Trump.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 12:32:37   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Loki wrote:
I knew that sooner or later, Bob would be good for something.




Between your and my dozens of quotes from our founding fathers, demonstrating the opposition they had from the post of this dip stick "infringement ".
He continues with his diatribe and yet ignores our empirical evidence proving his failed ideologies /thinking.

Typical leftist deflection, troll/Rhumatoid

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 12:40:09   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
I am done.
Thank God.

Reply
 
 
Jan 5, 2017 12:49:50   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
I don't know about you but I feel like Dancing.

Blade_Runner wrote:
Thank God.

Free at last . Dang this feels pretty dern good !
Free at last . Dang this feels pretty dern good !...

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 12:59:38   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
Duh. A little refresher in reading comprehension. Here is the sentence where "no say" is spoken: 'Does the state or Federal government have NO SAY in how to properly govern its citizens and secure the safety of the general welfare? The absurdity of unrestricted is a sickness of violence and irresponsibility.' It is a question, not a statement. No--to beat the obvious to death and beyond--I am not saying those enlisted by government to protect the common good and promote the general welfare of we the people have NO SAY in doing so, for it is there job and mandate. It was meant as a almost silly rhetorical question for people who have the capacity to understand such things.
Duh. A little refresher in reading comprehension. ... (show quote)


So...you're a propagandist. Ta ta!

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 16:22:49   #
Smokie
 
Dr.Dross wrote:
Infringe: actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.): "making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright" synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach

verb (used with object), infringed, infringing.
1.
to commit a breach or infraction of; violate or transgress:
to infringe a copyright; to infringe a rule.
verb (used without object), infringed, infringing.
2.
to encroach or trespass (usually followed by on or upon):
Don't infringe on his privacy.

transitive verb
1 :  to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <infringe a patent>

We looked at the 1st Amendment, the foundational principle of our Republic, and saw where it had to be limited--abridged--for the true spirit of that right to shine. Same is true of the 2nd Amendment. Not to infringe but to clarify its use. Infringe does not translate to unrestricted. Quite the opposite. "Well regulated" is not a term to ignore. If ignored is the only way that makes all other arguments of restricted or unrestricted individual ownership possible. A Fable. Or just a sincere delusion. Just blind!

"To keep and bear arms" by any individual, though not a given by the 2nd Amendment, is not infringed upon by gun-control measures presently on the books. A person still gets to keep their guns. Registering your guns and awaiting a background check does not infringe on the right to keep and bear arms by the individual citizen, which is not a right. Reasonable controls do not infringe on the imaginary individual right to keep and bear arms. Such controls merely speak to the spirit of what is just and fair and for the common good. An unrestricted 2nd Amendment violates the Constitution and is a menace to its citizens.
Infringe: actively break the terms of (a law, agre... (show quote)


You sound like an educated, ignorant left loon.
You need to refer to the writings of the Founding Fathers and then you should have a clear understanding of their intent of the 2nd!

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 16:24:48   #
Smokie
 
Loki wrote:
"To keep and bear arms" by any individual, though not a given by the 2nd Amendment,

Thank you. Reading your posts on this subject has enlightened me. Up until now, I only THOUGHT I understood the concept of "invincible ignorance."

You have managed to completely ignore the post I made on this thread containing comments of the men who WROTE the Second Amendment. There is absolutely NO DOUBT that it was intended as an individual right. You, like most Liberal hoplophobe Hobbit Dancers, have convinced yourselves that "the people" of the Second Amendment are somehow different from "the people" of all the others.

As a matter of fact, the Second Amendment, when it was written, fell under the purview of states' business. The Founders realized that different states have different needs. A gun control law that makes sense for New York would likely be ridiculous in Iowa.
As far as your disclaimer of individual right, I suppose you never heard of DC v Heller, in which the SCOTUS ruled that the Second acknowledges an INDIVIDUAL right to keep and bear arms. You have an amazing ability to completely ignore any facts that don't fit your parochial little viewpoint.
i "To keep and bear arms" by any indivi... (show quote)


Right, the 2nd does not GIVE us the right. We ALREADY HAVE IT!
The 2nd PROTECTS the right we ALREADY HAVE!

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 16:27:40   #
Smokie
 
[quote=jack sequim wa]PROVE ME WRONG LEFTIST / LIBERAL! !!!!
Your the kind of putz that will go and hide upon empirical evidence, right?Who knows better what the Second Amendment means than the Founding Fathers? Here are some powerful gun quotations from the Founding Fathers themselves.
"A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..."
- George Washington, First Annual Address, to both House of Congress, January 8, 1790
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776
"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787
"The laws that forbid the carrying of arms are laws of such a nature. They disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes.... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
- Thomas Jefferson, Commonplace Book (quoting 18th century criminologist Cesare Beccaria), 1774-1776
"A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to Peter Carr, August 19, 1785
"The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to to John Cartwright, 5 June 1824
"On every occasion [of Constitutional interpretation] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying [to force] what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [instead let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Johnson, 12 June 1823
"I enclose you a list of the killed, wounded, and captives of the enemy from the commencement of hostilities at Lexington in April, 1775, until November, 1777, since which there has been no event of any consequence ... I think that upon the whole it has been about one half the number lost by them, in some instances more, but in others less. This difference is ascribed to our superiority in taking aim when we fire; every soldier in our army having been intimate with his gun from his infancy."
- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Giovanni Fabbroni, June 8, 1778
“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
"To disarm the people...[i]s the most effectual way to enslave them."
- George Mason, referencing advice given to the British Parliament by Pennsylvania governor Sir William Keith, The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adooption of the Federal Constitution, June 14, 1788
"I ask who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers."
- George Mason, Address to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 4, 1788
"Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed, as they are in almost every country in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops."
- Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, October 10, 1787
"Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
"The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of a free country."
- James Madison, I Annals of Congress 434, June 8, 1789
"...the ultimate authority, wherever the derivative may be found, resides in the people alone..."
- James Madison, Federalist No. 46, January 29, 1788
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783
“A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves…and include, according to the past and general usuage of the states, all men capable of bearing arms… "To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them."
- Richard Henry Lee, Federal Farmer No. 18, January 25, 1788
"Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.... The great object is that every man be armed. Everyone who is able might have a gun."
- Patrick Henry, Speech to the Virginia Ratifying Convention, June 5, 1778
"This may be considered as the true palladium of liberty.... The right of self defense is the first law of nature: in most governments it has been the study of rulers to confine this right within the narrowest limits possible. Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction."
- St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England, 1803


Do I need to give more quotes? I can no problem, proving your failed efforts of continously searching the Web, for anything to prove your false narratives.[/quote]

Thanks for taking the time to post what my lazy butt didn't!

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 16:46:34   #
padremike Loc: Phenix City, Al
 
Smokie wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to post what my lazy butt didn't!


Smokie, I'm going to add a tag to your excellent post. You progressives may now sit down and shut up.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 17:06:01   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
I've copied it to word . Wish I had this years ago.
Very well done.

padremike wrote:
Smokie, I'm going to add a tag to your excellent post. You progressives may now sit down and shut up.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 17:06:23   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Smokie wrote:
Thanks for taking the time to post what my lazy butt didn't!




Little good it did. Typically leftist refused to acknowledge, and continued on with his diatribe.
I'm actually surprised he didn’t ask me to prove they were the founding fathers quotes, as a deflection.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 17:10:24   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
permafrost wrote:
Why is it that you Russia lovers do not seem to feel awkward callling other people communists??




Because you dip sticks cling to the trio......socialist /marxist /communist ideologies and political policies. Putz

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 20:34:28   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
And just for the record, your insistence that the 2nd amendment implies unrestricted gun possession is absurd.

I never said the 2nd Amendment implies unrestricted gun possession.

Blade_Runner wrote:

Moreover, the idea that universal background checks and gun registration is the solution is also absurd.

I never suggested that universal background checks and gun registration was the solution either.

So, do you ever make an effort to actually understand what a person is saying or are you just looking for any excuse to make stupid statements?

Blade_Runner wrote:

I suggest that if you are going to rewrite the constitution and the amendments that you should follow proper procedures to get that done. Babbling on with your twisted opinions is futile, not to mention how revealing it is of your ignorance.

As if you have the slightest understanding of what my opinion are. I suppose I could dumb things down so you can understand them better, but you would still have to make an effort to read the words.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 20:42:33   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Loki wrote:
Big Mike is smart enough to keep track of where he is directing his replies, slick.

"Loki", "Mike" one useful idiot looks like another to me. I'm sure he got the message.

Loki wrote:

I'm flattered. I appear to be getting free rent inside that cavernous empty space you call a head. What? Free rent? Does that make me Liberal?

Only if you're the one providing the space. That's what liberals do... they work hard and provide for others less fortunate. Being a conservative who whines and cries every time someone says you should provide for someone else, you probably wouldn't understand that. Too busy focusing on who's getting free stuff.

Reply
Jan 5, 2017 20:48:13   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
straightUp wrote:
Only if you're the one providing the space. That's what liberals do... they work hard and provide for others less fortunate. Being a conservative who whines and cries every time someone says you should provide for someone else, you probably wouldn't understand that. Too busy focusing on who's getting free stuff.




"Loki", "Mike" one useful idiot looks like another to me. I'm sure he got the message"

Too bad you haven't. So one useful idiot looks like another to you? I suppose as a useless idiot, you have a unique profile. The only time a Liberal provides for someone less fortunate is when he or she can do it with someone else's money.

There is no "free stuff," slick. Somewhere, some way, someone is footing the bill.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 11 of 12 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.