One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This Kind Of Thing Just Makes Me Trigger-happy.
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Dec 21, 2016 23:56:29   #
KiraSeer2016
 
Big dog wrote:
And your point is......?


Either he is deflecting, or maybe just trying to show how "smart" he is. Smarmy is more like it.

Reply
Dec 21, 2016 23:57:40   #
KiraSeer2016
 
Big dog wrote:
If you see a cock in the women's room, remove it. The person can STAY


"Person?"

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 01:04:56   #
America Only Loc: From the right hand of God
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most leftist jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/transgender_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'hate crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)


I've already busted my foot off into a few of these maggots for trying to go into the "women's bathroom" I could care less if some cop wants to arrest me or not on this sort of issue. Show these maggots NO mercy. "F" em...they can get a good ass beating as they deserve it.

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2016 01:20:43   #
Big dog
 
America Only wrote:
I've already busted my foot off into a few of these maggots for trying to go into the "women's bathroom" I could care less if some cop wants to arrest me or not on this sort of issue. Show these maggots NO mercy. "F" em...they can get a good ass beating as they deserve it.

I'm glad I don't frequent these places, otherwise I'd be in jail.
Me and my kind WON'T tolerate this kind of behavior. But then again, I don't live in a city. It's the bleeding heart, liberal, citified IDIOTS that allow such behavior.
We need MORE walls. Keep them inside the soft snowflake zone where they won't melt and let us go on with taking care of the Nation.

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 01:34:21   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
KiraSeer2016 wrote:
Either he is deflecting, or maybe just trying to show how "smart" he is. Smarmy is more like it.
Did you get the point of my post? I wasn't deflecting, I was responding to a poster who was condemning our founders, that they were property owners, and that America is a democracy. Madison's essay on property is a brilliant statement.

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 07:38:50   #
ssgtgood
 
oldroy wrote:
Who gets to pay for that "surgery"? Sure as hell, not me.


I would imagine that fathers, brothers, husbands, or boy friends would gladly do it for free. I would. Might not be painless but it would be quick and a threat would be permanently removed from society.

Semper Fidelis
Sic Semper Tyrannis
Molon Labe

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 07:51:28   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
KiraSeer2016 wrote:
Death of a culture.











Controlled "crash-test," 2016. Always necessary in an "experimental" Republic from time-to-time; and these past 8 years were a doozy!!! And "WE" again did swimmingly!!! GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP!!!

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2016 10:37:01   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
America was not founded as a democracy.

Educate yourself:

James Madison, Property

29 Mar. 1792 Papers 14:266--68

This term in its particular application means "that dominion which one man claims and exercises over the external things of the world, in exclusion of every other individual."

In its larger and juster meaning, it embraces every thing to which a man may attach a value and have a right; and which leaves to every one else the like advantage.

In the former sense, a man's land, or merchandize, or money is called his property.

In the latter sense, a man has a property in his opinions and the free communication of them.

He has a property of peculiar value in his religious opinions, and in the profession and practice dictated by them.

He has a property very dear to him in the safety and liberty of his person.

He has an equal property in the free use of his faculties and free choice of the objects on which to employ them.

In a word, as a man is said to have a right to his property, he may be equally said to have a property in his rights.

Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.

Where there is an excess of liberty, the effect is the same, tho' from an opposite cause.

Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government, which impartially secures to every man, whatever is his own.

According to this standard of merit, the praise of affording a just securing to property, should be sparingly bestowed on a government which, however scrupulously guarding the possessions of individuals, does not protect them in the enjoyment and communication of their opinions, in which they have an equal, and in the estimation of some, a more valuable property.

More sparingly should this praise be allowed to a government, where a man's religious rights are violated by penalties, or fettered by tests, or taxed by a hierarchy. Conscience is the most sacred of all property; other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and unalienable right. To guard a man's house as his castle, to pay public and enforce private debts with the most exact faith, can give no title to invade a man's conscience which is more sacred than his castle, or to withhold from it that debt of protection, for which the public faith is pledged, by the very nature and original conditions of the social pact.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where the property which a man has in his personal safety and personal liberty, is violated by arbitrary seizures of one class of citizens for the service of the rest. A magistrate issuing his warrants to a press gang, would be in his proper functions in Turkey or Indostan, under appellations proverbial of the most compleat despotism.

That is not a just government, nor is property secure under it, where arbitrary restrictions, exemptions, and monopolies deny to part of its citizens that free use of their faculties, and free choice of their occupations, which not only constitute their property in the general sense of the word; but are the means of acquiring property strictly so called. What must be the spirit of legislation where a manufacturer of linen cloth is forbidden to bury his own child in a linen shroud, in order to favour his neighbour who manufactures woolen cloth; where the manufacturer and wearer of woolen cloth are again forbidden the oeconomical use of buttons of that material, in favor of the manufacturer of buttons of other materials!

A just security to property is not afforded by that government, under which unequal taxes oppress one species of property and reward another species: where arbitrary taxes invade the domestic sanctuaries of the rich, and excessive taxes grind the faces of the poor; where the keenness and competitions of want are deemed an insufficient spur to labor, and taxes are again applied, by an unfeeling policy, as another spur; in violation of that sacred property, which Heaven, in decreeing man to earn his bread by the sweat of his brow, kindly reserved to him, in the small repose that could be spared from the supply of his necessities.

If there be a government then which prides itself in maintaining the inviolability of property; which provides that none shall be taken directly even for public use without indemnification to the owner, and yet directly violates the property which individuals have in their opinions, their religion, their persons, and their faculties; nay more, which indirectly violates their property, in their actual possessions, in the labor that acquires their daily subsistence, and in the hallowed remnant of time which ought to relieve their fatigues and soothe their cares, the influence [inference?] will have been anticipated, that such a government is not a pattern for the United States.

If the United States mean to obtain or deserve the full praise due to wise and just governments, they will equally respect the rights of property, and the property in rights: they will rival the government that most sacredly guards the former; and by repelling its example in violating the latter, will make themselves a pattern to that and all other governments.
America was not founded as a democracy. br br Ed... (show quote)






Unfortunately, the government and liberals think THEY own everyones' brain.

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 11:48:57   #
KiraSeer2016
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Did you get the point of my post? I wasn't deflecting, I was responding to a poster who was condemning our founders, that they were property owners, and that America is a democracy. Madison's essay on property is a brilliant statement.


Guess I did.

I mean, guess I didn't. But I do now.

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 11:59:18   #
maureenthannon
 
old roy, Yes you will pay for it. Nowadays, when someone in prison decides that their bodies are the wrong gender, us tax payers pay for the surgery to fix them.

Reply
Dec 22, 2016 12:24:30   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
INVIOLABILITY,thank you for my learning word of the day.

Reply
 
 
Dec 22, 2016 16:51:30   #
Smokie
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most leftist jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/transgender_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'hate crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)


I believe that the only right it gives them is the right to see a shrink.

Reply
Jan 3, 2017 10:03:31   #
Bigmac495 Loc: Indiana
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this crap: "Last week, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals declared that the Constitution of the United States required schools to allow boys who believe they are girls to use the girls’ restrooms." Oh, really. It goes on: "This would come as a shock to the people who wrote the Constitution, but so is most leftist jurisprudence these days." Came as a shock to me, too!

http://www.dailywire.com/news/11759/appeals-court-boys-who-think-theyre-girls-have-ben-shapiro?utm_source=shapironewsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_content=070516-news-title&utm_campaign=two

This pathetic excuse for a total waste of court time originated in Ohio. Oh, yeah, Ohio, where the moonbattedness is getting deeper and deeper:

http://www.cleveland.com/cityhall/index.ssf/2016/07/transgender_bathroom_legislati.html

And I suppose if some husband or brother found one of these 'pseudo-girls' trying to 'share' a bathroom with a wife or sister and clocked his ass it would be classed a 'hate crime' and the ensuing 'justice' would be swift and severe. This. Has. Got. To. Stop.
I get the urge to start blasting when I read this ... (show quote)

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amen!

Reply
Jan 3, 2017 10:25:41   #
snowbear37 Loc: MA.
 
Transgenderism is a mental illness. The suicide rate for transgenders is like 40%.

Reply
Jan 3, 2017 11:16:04   #
KiraSeer2016
 
snowbear37 wrote:
Transgenderism is a mental illness. The suicide rate for transgenders is like 40%.



I'm sure libs explain that away by saying if others just wouldn't condemn them, they wouldn't kill themselves. A womanish attempt at cause-and-effect.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.