General Mattis to Ash Carter (Page 2): "Dicks (Dick's) on fire!!"...

KiraSeer2016

Texas Truth wrote:

Carter is probably crying this is the wrong ambush site! No more limp Dick's . They will know he's serious when he stares at their eyes while stirring the campfire with his dick.

"Dicks (Dick's) on fire!!"

boatbob2

When the Jarheads (marines) charge ahead,they will be met by a LRRP, ( long range recon patrol) US Army RANGER.To lead the way !!!!!!

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

It starts at the top, Obama limp, Carter limp, birds of feather.

Texas Truth wrote:

Carter is probably crying this is the wrong ambush site! No more limp Dick's . They will know he's serious when he stares at their eyes while stirring the campfire with his dick.

mouset783 Loc: Oklahoma

KiraSeer2016 wrote:

Do you remember choosing kids for your team when you were a child? (Before Liberalism.) I only chose the best for my team.

I'm absolutely positive Putin doesn't want any weenies on his team!!

Great going, Donald!

We used to choose whoever brought the bat and ball kinda like O'vomit and the pig.

KiraSeer2016

mouset783 wrote:

We used to choose whoever brought the bat and ball kinda like O'vomit and the pig.

The pig?

mouset783 Loc: Oklahoma

KiraSeer2016 wrote:

The pig?

Hillary Obama.

Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

payne1000 wrote:

General Mattis may not be an Islamic sympathizer, but he's no lover of Israel either.

General Mattis may have some issues, but he isn't a Jew hating Nazi scumbag like some assholes that post here. To imply that an American Marine general with an outstanding record of service is "no lover of Israel" is an unforgivable slandering of an honorable man. If you weren't so full of hate and discontent, dipshits like you could learn something from men like Mattis. Never once have you exhibited even a modicum of honesty on anything pertaining to Israel.

President and CEO Michael Makovsky of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) wrote that JINSA, “an organization dedicated to a robust U.S. national security posture and a strong U.S.-Israel security relationship,” would not endorse any one candidate for a government position but still felt “compelled to convey that characterizations of one candidate, General James N. Mattis, USMC (ret.), as anti-Israel are ill-founded and unfair.”

Specifically, Makovsky addressed himself to criticism about “extemporaneous remarks General Mattis made at the Aspen Institute in July 2013 on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. They were made shortly following his retirement after a very distinguished four-decade-long career in the U.S. military, with his last position as Commander of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), where his area of responsibility covered much of the Middle East and Central Asia (excluding Israel), Makovsky wrote.

“We understand and share many of the objections to his remarks, including that he seemed to blame mostly Israel for the impasse, despite the critical challenges it faces in lacking a stable, moderate Palestinian partner that genuinely seeks a durable peace with the Jewish state. Some American Jews and even Israelis make the same mistake. In any case, he has not repeated those remarks,” he noted.

“On the larger U.S. military and strategic issues related to the Middle East, which a Secretary of Defense will have to address early on, General Mattis has notably and indisputably distinguished himself in advocating for a more robust U.S. military posture to counter, contain and deter Iran, even at the peril of his military career, and its importance to American security and the restoration of America’s position in the Middle East – views JINSA has strongly propounded. Along similar lines, he has stressed the need to stand by our longstanding regional friends.

“General Mattis’ outlook on these issues aligns perfectly with Israel’s, which considers an aggressive Iran its greatest strategic threat, and a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat. Israel also seeks a strong U.S. presence in the Middle East.

“General Mattis has noted this alignment of views with Israel, and correctly explained the synchronization of Israeli and Arab outlooks on these subjects. This should be heartening to the overwhelming majority of Americans who believe that a strong State of Israel is necessary for its own sake and important for a strong America.”

Makovsky went on to write, “JINSA’s experiences with General Mattis have been very positive, including many private discussions in the last few years on the Middle East. We recently consulted several notable Israelis and Americans in the civic and military spheres who also have interacted with him and they share our confidence in his support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.

“Were General Mattis to become Secretary of Defense, and work more closely with Israel in that position, an opportunity he lacked at CENTCOM, we believe he will become an even closer friend of the State of Israel.”

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Blade_Runner wrote:

General Mattis may have some issues, but he isn't a Jew hating Nazi scumbag like some assholes that post here. To imply that an American Marine general with an outstanding record of service is "no lover of Israel" is an unforgivable slandering of an honorable man. If you weren't so full of hate and discontent, dipshits like you could learn something from men like Mattis. Never once have you exhibited even a modicum of honesty on anything pertaining to Israel.

President and CEO Michael Makovsky of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) wrote that JINSA, âan organization dedicated to a robust U.S. national security posture and a strong U.S.-Israel security relationship,â would not endorse any one candidate for a government position but still felt âcompelled to convey that characterizations of one candidate, General James N. Mattis, USMC (ret.), as anti-Israel are ill-founded and unfair.â

Specifically, Makovsky addressed himself to criticism about âextemporaneous remarks General Mattis made at the Aspen Institute in July 2013 on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. They were made shortly following his retirement after a very distinguished four-decade-long career in the U.S. military, with his last position as Commander of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), where his area of responsibility covered much of the Middle East and Central Asia (excluding Israel), Makovsky wrote.

âWe understand and share many of the objections to his remarks, including that he seemed to blame mostly Israel for the impasse, despite the critical challenges it faces in lacking a stable, moderate Palestinian partner that genuinely seeks a durable peace with the Jewish state. Some American Jews and even Israelis make the same mistake. In any case, he has not repeated those remarks,â he noted.

âOn the larger U.S. military and strategic issues related to the Middle East, which a Secretary of Defense will have to address early on, General Mattis has notably and indisputably distinguished himself in advocating for a more robust U.S. military posture to counter, contain and deter Iran, even at the peril of his military career, and its importance to American security and the restoration of Americaâs position in the Middle East â views JINSA has strongly propounded. Along similar lines, he has stressed the need to stand by our longstanding regional friends.

âGeneral Mattisâ outlook on these issues aligns perfectly with Israelâs, which considers an aggressive Iran its greatest strategic threat, and a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat. Israel also seeks a strong U.S. presence in the Middle East.

âGeneral Mattis has noted this alignment of views with Israel, and correctly explained the synchronization of Israeli and Arab outlooks on these subjects. This should be heartening to the overwhelming majority of Americans who believe that a strong State of Israel is necessary for its own sake and important for a strong America.â

Makovsky went on to write, âJINSAâs experiences with General Mattis have been very positive, including many private discussions in the last few years on the Middle East. We recently consulted several notable Israelis and Americans in the civic and military spheres who also have interacted with him and they share our confidence in his support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.

âWere General Mattis to become Secretary of Defense, and work more closely with Israel in that position, an opportunity he lacked at CENTCOM, we believe he will become an even closer friend of the State of Israel.â

General Mattis may have some issues, but he isn't ... (show quote)

payne1000

Blade_Runner wrote:

General Mattis may have some issues, but he isn't a Jew hating Nazi scumbag like some assholes that post here. To imply that an American Marine general with an outstanding record of service is "no lover of Israel" is an unforgivable slandering of an honorable man. If you weren't so full of hate and discontent, dipshits like you could learn something from men like Mattis. Never once have you exhibited even a modicum of honesty on anything pertaining to Israel.

President and CEO Michael Makovsky of the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) wrote that JINSA, “an organization dedicated to a robust U.S. national security posture and a strong U.S.-Israel security relationship,” would not endorse any one candidate for a government position but still felt “compelled to convey that characterizations of one candidate, General James N. Mattis, USMC (ret.), as anti-Israel are ill-founded and unfair.”

Specifically, Makovsky addressed himself to criticism about “extemporaneous remarks General Mattis made at the Aspen Institute in July 2013 on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. They were made shortly following his retirement after a very distinguished four-decade-long career in the U.S. military, with his last position as Commander of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM), where his area of responsibility covered much of the Middle East and Central Asia (excluding Israel), Makovsky wrote.

“We understand and share many of the objections to his remarks, including that he seemed to blame mostly Israel for the impasse, despite the critical challenges it faces in lacking a stable, moderate Palestinian partner that genuinely seeks a durable peace with the Jewish state. Some American Jews and even Israelis make the same mistake. In any case, he has not repeated those remarks,” he noted.

“On the larger U.S. military and strategic issues related to the Middle East, which a Secretary of Defense will have to address early on, General Mattis has notably and indisputably distinguished himself in advocating for a more robust U.S. military posture to counter, contain and deter Iran, even at the peril of his military career, and its importance to American security and the restoration of America’s position in the Middle East – views JINSA has strongly propounded. Along similar lines, he has stressed the need to stand by our longstanding regional friends.

“General Mattis’ outlook on these issues aligns perfectly with Israel’s, which considers an aggressive Iran its greatest strategic threat, and a nuclear Iran to be an existential threat. Israel also seeks a strong U.S. presence in the Middle East.

“General Mattis has noted this alignment of views with Israel, and correctly explained the synchronization of Israeli and Arab outlooks on these subjects. This should be heartening to the overwhelming majority of Americans who believe that a strong State of Israel is necessary for its own sake and important for a strong America.”

Makovsky went on to write, “JINSA’s experiences with General Mattis have been very positive, including many private discussions in the last few years on the Middle East. We recently consulted several notable Israelis and Americans in the civic and military spheres who also have interacted with him and they share our confidence in his support for a strong U.S.-Israel relationship.

“Were General Mattis to become Secretary of Defense, and work more closely with Israel in that position, an opportunity he lacked at CENTCOM, we believe he will become an even closer friend of the State of Israel.”

General Mattis may have some issues, but he isn't ... (show quote)

Makovsky takes the warmongering attitude of most Zionists. He wants the U.S. to go to war with Iran. Israel would sit on the sidelines as they did with the other Middle East wars the U.S. has fought for their benefit.
Zionist traitors such as yourself don't care how many Americans die for Israel's benefit.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

Blade_Runner wrote:

.

Perhaps we could introduce Gen. Mattis to Larry Payne.

payne1000

amadjuster wrote:

Perhaps we could introduce Gen. Mattis to Larry Payne.

Maybe he'd be more interested in your activities . . .

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

payne1000 wrote:

Maybe he'd be more interested in your activities . . .

Once again, Larry reveals his black, evil soul. Gen. Mattis would not take long with Larry.

payne1000

amadjuster wrote:

Once again, Larry reveals his black, evil soul. Gen. Mattis would not take long with Larry.

Your avatar exposes your evil soul.
Only murderous cowards hide in the weeds to prey on their victims.

amadjuster Loc: Texas Panhandle

My soul is just fine, as is my conscious. Saving American lives is what it is all about.

Just keep paying attention to the bushes and clumps of weeds. One of them might be a gillie suit with a rifle.

BOO💥

payne1000

amadjuster wrote:

My soul is just fine, as is my conscious. Saving American lives is what it is all about.

Just keep paying attention to the bushes and clumps of weeds. One of them might be a gillie suit with a rifle.

BOOð¥

Another veiled threat?
You are so small-minded.