One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Draining the Swamp
Page <<first <prev 10 of 10
Dec 3, 2016 14:41:20   #
PeterS
 
JFlorio wrote:
Because they didn't have to do anything to earn it. That figure is bogus. Like most of the bull you site. I don't care if the wall is virtual, electric or they decide on a moat full of gators if it works. Would just one of you dip stick liberals please tell the rest of us Latinophobes why you don't want a secure border?


Because they didn't do anything to earn it? What are you talking about? You said illegals didn't want to be citizens and I merely pointed out millions because citizens when Reagan gave them the chance. As for my 'figures' being bogus--Trumps used them and conservatives have criticized Obama in the past because Bush turned back the same number but only counted those deported through ICE as being legitimate deportations. And skepticism over a wall has nothing to do with wanting a secure border. Bush wasted billions of dollars on a broken down fence. In my opinion, more guards with drones would be a better use of money than a wall that we've already shown to be impractical.

Reply
Dec 3, 2016 14:43:15   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Notice you didn't answer the question.
PeterS wrote:
Because they didn't do anything to earn it? What are you talking about? You said illegals didn't want to be citizens and I merely pointed out millions because citizens when Reagan gave them the chance. As for my 'figures' being bogus--Trumps used them and conservatives have criticized Obama in the past because Bush turned back the same number but only counted those deported through ICE as being legitimate deportations. And skepticism over a wall has nothing to do with wanting a secure border. Bush wasted billions of dollars on a broken down fence. In my opinion, more guards with drones would be a better use of money than a wall that we've already shown to be impractical.
Because they didn't do anything to earn it? What a... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 3, 2016 20:45:05   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
lindajoy wrote:
Nope, more like $153 million in Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking fees, documented from 2001 forward..an average of $201.560.00 a speech...
By Robert Yoon, CNN

Updated 1:15 PM ET, Sat February 6, 2016 ......

just given it away to lies...

http://youtu.be/Mr_uHJPUlO8


My bad!

Reply
 
 
Dec 4, 2016 10:20:36   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
PeterS wrote:
Hey, it's a free market. If the venue didn't want to pay it they certainly didn't have to...


You are absolutely right but you see that's how she rolls and they needed her to keep the gravy train running...They know for money her mouth was in gear doing what they needed her to do..She was a high paid lobbyist for them all..

Now they have wasted millions and are a tad upset...Heavy investment funds and the voters went south on all of them...

Thanks to all the lies of MSN they didn't even know how skewed and distorted MSN was being...It cost them dearly too...Yet, who is still believing them while they now throw millions away on something that will change nothing...???

Personally I say bring it, count all 3 states, including absentee votes, verify every one of them and give us the results.

Reply
Dec 4, 2016 10:24:56   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
You are absolutely right but you see that's how she rolls and they needed her to keep the gravy train running...They know for money her mouth was in gear doing what they needed her to do..She was a high paid lobbyist for them all..

Now they have wasted millions and are a tad upset...Heavy investment funds and the voters went south on all of them...

Thanks to all the lies of MSN they didn't even know how skewed and distorted MSN was being...It cost them dearly too...Yet, who is still believing them while they now through millions away on something that will change nothing...???

Personally I say bring it, count all 3 states, including absentee votes, verify every one of them and give us the results.
You are absolutely right but you see that's how sh... (show quote)


You would think that now would be a good time for her to start treating her protectors like human beings. I'll bet she won't though.

Reply
Dec 4, 2016 10:30:44   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
archie bunker wrote:
You would think that now would be a good time for her to start treating her protectors like human beings. I'll bet she won't though.


I rather doubt that based on all we read in how she treated Secret Service and even those trying to help her into the White House...

She is one hardened by the system and if anything she will be even worse ....I hope not but I'm not optimistic about it...

She has worked her whole career to hit the White House herself.. Unfortunately the one thing she wanted most was stripped away because of how she went about it all...

Reply
Dec 4, 2016 10:39:44   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
I rather doubt that based on all we read in how she treated Secret Service and even those trying to help her into the White House...

She is one hardened by the system and if anything she will be even worse ....I hope not but I'm not optimistic about it...

She has worked her whole career to hit the White House herself.. Unfortunately the one thing she wanted most was stripped away because of how she went about it all...


I also think that it was because of the way the left has behaved over the last eight years. They went too far, too fast. That, and people are generally sick of dirty, devisive, mud slinging politics, and being bullied by the "social engineers."

Reply
 
 
Dec 20, 2016 11:06:44   #
saltwind 78 Loc: Murrells Inlet, South Carolina
 
Peter, Draining the swamp is another lie comping from the Donald. He has appointed billionaires and generals to the cabinet so far. As far as I can see, he is populating the swamp with dangerous predators!
PeterS wrote:
The Trump Administration IS the Swamp!



And this is just for starters!

Reply
Dec 20, 2016 16:22:12   #
KiraSeer2016
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Peter, Draining the swamp is another lie comping from the Donald. He has appointed billionaires and generals to the cabinet so far. As far as I can see, he is populating the swamp with dangerous predators!


Oh, you poor thing. Just don't know that you're going to be able live comfortably without government there at your elbow.

Reply
Dec 20, 2016 16:59:43   #
mongo Loc: TEXAS
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Peter, Draining the swamp is another lie comping from the Donald. He has appointed billionaires and generals to the cabinet so far. As far as I can see, he is populating the swamp with dangerous predators!


Suck it up Butter-cup, we never promised you a rose garden!

Reply
Dec 20, 2016 17:36:11   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
saltwind 78 wrote:
Peter, Draining the swamp is another lie comping from the Donald. He has appointed billionaires and generals to the cabinet so far. As far as I can see, he is populating the swamp with dangerous predators!


Predators are vital to maintaining the balance of any ecosystem. America's ecosystem is badly out of balance now, and needs beneficial predators to restore balance.

Kind of like using beneficial insects to control worms in your garden.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 10
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.