How many "biggest scandals ever" do you introduce a week? Did you ever consider that maybe it's the sources you read where the scandal lies since none of them ever seem to come about....
How many "biggest scandals ever" do you introduce a week? Did you ever consider that maybe it's the sources you read where the scandal lies since none of them ever seem to come about....
It's not that they don't occur. It's just that those like you don't notice them because you see sleaze and corruption as preferred, or at least acceptable behavior in your leaders.
It's not that they don't occur. It's just that those like you don't notice them because you see sleaze and corruption as preferred, or at least acceptable behavior in your leaders.
Liberals may have noticed but are too lax when it comes to a Clinton, if this had been a Bush they'd want a hanging ASAP. When it comes to national security I want a hanging and doesn't matter which side it is.
Super Dave wrote:
It's not that they don't occur. It's just that those like you don't notice them because you see sleaze and corruption as preferred, or at least acceptable behavior in your leaders.
How many "biggest scandals ever" do you introduce a week? Did you ever consider that maybe it's the sources you read where the scandal lies since none of them ever seem to come about....
Did you ever think that maybe it's about time you shut up?
How many "biggest scandals ever" do you introduce a week? Did you ever consider that maybe it's the sources you read where the scandal lies since none of them ever seem to come about....
Did you ever consider the overwhelming evidence of the clinton crime machine , just so much there , it's a target rich environment pete !
How many "biggest scandals ever" do you introduce a week? Did you ever consider that maybe it's the sources you read where the scandal lies since none of them ever seem to come about....
You keep introducing scandals until honest people do their job, and put criminals in jail........
There are the first one's to bitch up a storm when a republican steps out of line but every time Clinton she gets a pass even when she doesn't bother to give an Ambassador and his people the extra security he asks for, when come the excuses like 'the republicans cut spending 'discretionary spending' which means the PRESIDENT decided it wasn't important.
Docadhoc wrote:
Have you noticed how some of these liberals lately have been proving they are as obtuse as we knew them to be all along?