fullspinzoo

Well, it's about time. I think Dir. Comey understood what a horrific mistake he made by not indicting the LIAR/FELON the first time around, when over 100 FBI agents were talking about sending in their letters of resignation. https://thehornnews.com/fbi-clinton-indictment-coming-soon/

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

"thehornnews" is a reliable source.

Funny, how an indictment isn't on the minds of congress or the justice department. Maybe you ought to go look at their dockets?

Let them leave: annual savings, $20,000,000+. Can't seem to find any of the information to indict her for anything.

midnite Loc: Beantown

the clinton foundation is the reason for indictment ...

fullspinzoo

You don't read much do you?
She has five investigations going by the FBI, get your head out of your derriere. No candidate in the history of this country has been under investigation for pay-to-play, private Emails, Clinton Foundatin scandals. She has more scandals than most people ever. Everything she does is corrupt. Did she play FAIR against her own Bernie Sanders? Did she play fair when Donna Brazile handed her questions ahead of time in the debates? Did she play fair when she went from being "dead broke" and now worth over $100 million? Does she tell the truth about anything? Her own campaign manager says "she lies often". She is genuine scum bag and anybody who approves of her unethical bullshit is a scum bag too. She has no morals, no scruples, no ethics, no religious conviction, NO NOTHING. She is pure scum just like anybody who is ignorant enough to vote for her. Guess we know what camp you fall in. Enough said.

Rivers

I'm new here, but I picture you like a vulture sitting on a limb just ready to jump on anything or anybody who doesn't walk the straight line according to your specifications. Your responses are just meant to be antagonistic and not constructive.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

FBI has also indicated there is a 99% chance that up to five foreign intelligence agencies may have accessed and taken emails from Hillary Clinton’s private server, two separate sources with intimate knowledge of the FBI investigations told Fox News.

bmac32 Loc: West Florida

This what liberals do when the information pertains to democrats, they run interference.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

While I'd like to believe there is validity to this I'm cautious it is yet again BS thrown out there just to keep the issue of those proven damning emails of Hillary and her criminal cronies on the second page instead of front page...


Hill Republicans raring to investigate Clinton from Day One
If she beats Trump, the former secretary of state could be at war with Capitol Hill before she's even sworn in.

Let's take a look for a minute~~~

In a rare instance of self-restraint, congressional Republicans deferred to the FBI when it came to investigating Hillary Clinton’s emails as the presidential election unfolded.

It’s safe to say the past four days have obliterated any vestige of their inhibition.....

If the GOP wins either or both chambers of Congress next week, and Clinton takes the White House, she’s likely to come under investigation by Capitol Hill from Day One, or possibly before she’s even sworn in. FBI Director James Comey’s recent decision to revisit the probe of her email setup, and an assortment of Justice sources who’ve leaked to the press since Friday, have armed GOP lawmakers with more than enough ammunition to rev up their own investigations, say Republican sources on Capitol Hill.

Trey Gowdy out to be having a field day by now!!!!
~ ~ ~

Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz of Utah is asking whether FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — whose wife received almost a half-million dollars in campaign contributions from a group connected to Clinton confidant Terry McAuliffe — recused himself from the email investigation. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa wants to know whether Justice officials tied agents’ hands by limiting investigative techniques.

And the heads of the House Judiciary and Senate Homeland Security committees, as well as intelligence panels on both sides of the Capitol, are asking some of the same questions and seeking briefings from the Justice Department. Those briefings are unlikely to occur before the election.

“Regardless of who wins on Nov. 8, we must address the Obama administration’s overreach and Secretary Clinton’s State Department failures,” said Oversight Committee member Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) in an emailed statement. “While the Benghazi Committee’s authorization concludes at year’s end, we need to continue investigating Secretary Clinton’s email scandal, and alleged impropriety between the State Department and Clinton Foundation.”

~ ~ ~

In the meantime, Republicans are compiling a laundry list of questions for Comey or Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chairman Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) over the weekend asked the Justice Department about reports that officials tried to discourage Comey’s disclosure to Congress.

Grassley wants to know from Comey about whether Justice Department officials ever rejected FBI agents' requests for search warrants or subpoenas or to empanel a grand jury. Those questions hint at GOP theories that Justice officials may have limited the scope of the investigation. A recent Wall Street Journal report indicated that DOJ reined in FBI agents looking into possible impropriety by the Clinton Foundation. It's unclear whether that also occurred with the Clinton email investigation.

~ ~ ~

"The FBI has all these resources — they used them for other investigations of this type — but here [with the Clinton probe] they really investigated with one hand behind their back," said a Republican source who works for a congressional committee with oversight authority. "They didn’t do subpoenas. They didn’t do search warrants. They relied on these agreements that limit what they can look at and how they can use that information."

The person continued, "They certainly handcuffed themselves, and that can certainly be something people look into down the line, depending on what happens."

Capitol Hill Republicans are also now asking about recent reports alleging that FBI officials working on the email investigation would not share messages relevant to the Clinton Foundation probe. As part of an immunity agreement with Clinton's former chief of staff Cheryl Mills and her deputy Heather Samuelson, the FBI promised to destroy both of their laptops handed over to authorities.

Republicans have asked the FBI whether it destroyed the technology used to sift through Clinton's emails but haven't received an answer.

At some point, Republican leaders will have to decide how far they're willing to go with the Clinton investigations. House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) this fall greenlighted his committee chairmen to pursue various Clinton-related investigations, after Comey recommended not prosecuting the former secretary of state.
It won't be easy to rein in some committee heads.

"Even before we get to Day One, we’ve got two years’ worth of material already lined up," Chaffetz told The Washington Post last week. "She has four years of history at the State Department, and it ain’t good."


For full article:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/11/house-republicans-investigate-clinton-fbi-230604

_________________

fullspinzoo

For a new guy, you sure have "his number". Those in Hillary's "camp" can't argue substance, can't argue against the fact that Hillary is dishonest, probably the most unethical politician out there today. If she gets elected this country is done, IMO. She will be an extension of the failed policies of Barrack Obama. He had almost eight years to turn things around and he just simply hasn't done it. Period.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

My point, you syphilis infected idiot is that, an investigation is an investigation. That's a far cry from an indictment. They have not formally charged her, so indictment is the wrong word. At the end of the day, she can claim that she didn't know anything and plead the fifth.

You don't read anything, since you just read crap from nobodies that know nothing.

She's a methodist. What is "religious conviction"? How do you know anything about her "morals"?

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

so what. How many times did she get frog marched into a congressional hearing and walk out? The answer is seven.

fullspinzoo

fullspinzoo

FU You're an idiot!!!

Floyd Brown Loc: Milwaukee WI

This is an issue being tried in the Court of Public Opinion where thoughts & rumors are used as facts.

In a Court of Law one needs facts.

I don't think that there are any people in the Public Eye that really wish to be tried in a Court of law based on Public rumors.
I would say that these issues before Us today are being weighed very carefully.

I would say that Trump should have been very careful in throwing stones while living in a glass house.

Even G.W. has been trying to keep a low profile. As are a couple of his old buddies. There have been rumors that there are Foreign Interests that would like to see them in Court.

I would say there is interest from the Deep State not to draw the wrong kind of interest in cases of this Nature.

Never let it be said that there is no Code of Honor amongst thieves.

Never let it be said that I wish thieves get away with out due proses.

The true power is in the hands of the masses but they have lost t or given away to the Political Parties. These chosen people have then sold out to Special Interest.

Little by little if we can act on issues that concern Us we can make changes that help us. We may have to start with the little fish first.

Dummy Boy Loc: Michigan

Very true Floyd.