Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter.
Spontaneous generation: The theory that the earliest life forms on earth developed from nonliving matter.
Does that sound logical, or magical, to you? All the planets are aligned, got some unknown chemicals-fairy dust no doubt, before fairy dust was outlawed, and poof - life. Sounds magical and very fanciful to me. And yet it must be true because a scientist said so and they've never been wrong before.............oh wait, that's not any where near to the truth. Flat earth, coming Ice Age, no more polar ice caps etc. Those theories where based on what? Logic? And then with abiogenesis, they took their logic and turned it into a fanciful magical fairy tale, but it's OK because it's science.
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter.
Spontaneous generation: The theory that the earliest life forms on earth developed from nonliving matter.
Does that sound logical, or magical, to you? All the planets are aligned, got some unknown chemicals-fairy dust no doubt, before fairy dust was outlawed, and poof - life. Sounds magical and very fanciful to me. And yet it must be true because a scientist said so and they've never been wrong before.............oh wait, that's not any where near to the truth. Flat earth, coming Ice Age, no more polar ice caps etc. Those theories where based on what? Logic? And then with abiogenesis, they took their logic and turned it into a fanciful magical fairy tale, but it's OK because it's science.
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneou... (
show quote)
If these scientist what to study something extraordinary all they need to do is open the good book (bible to you heathens) and check out the prophecy there in words inspired and directed by God ..History shows the prophetic truth of the bible !
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter.
Spontaneous generation: The theory that the earliest life forms on earth developed from nonliving matter.
Does that sound logical, or magical, to you? All the planets are aligned, got some unknown chemicals-fairy dust no doubt, before fairy dust was outlawed, and poof - life. Sounds magical and very fanciful to me. And yet it must be true because a scientist said so and they've never been wrong before.............oh wait, that's not any where near to the truth. Flat earth, coming Ice Age, no more polar ice caps etc. Those theories where based on what? Logic? And then with abiogenesis, they took their logic and turned it into a fanciful magical fairy tale, but it's OK because it's science.
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneou... (
show quote)
Life was indeed created somehow,out of "non living material"
The influence is up to discussion. The fact we are here shows it happened.
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter.
Spontaneous generation: The theory that the earliest life forms on earth developed from nonliving matter.
Does that sound logical, or magical, to you? All the planets are aligned, got some unknown chemicals-fairy dust no doubt, before fairy dust was outlawed, and poof - life. Sounds magical and very fanciful to me. And yet it must be true because a scientist said so and they've never been wrong before.............oh wait, that's not any where near to the truth. Flat earth, coming Ice Age, no more polar ice caps etc. Those theories where based on what? Logic? And then with abiogenesis, they took their logic and turned it into a fanciful magical fairy tale, but it's OK because it's science.
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneou... (
show quote)
Only one real science based on logic with no assumptions, mathematics.
It stands on its own.
bilordinary wrote:
Only one real science based on logic with no assumptions, mathematics.
It stands on its own.
Well...........................unless your a graduate of Common Core.
Because 2 + 2 can = 5, if you have a good reason.
And, as long as you stay away from super massive black holes, quantum physics and don't try to put them together.
And after that, there's string theory....................................
bilordinary wrote:
Only one real science based on logic with no assumptions, mathematics.
It stands on its own.
I believe other scientific fields are the same. Chemistry, biology, genetics. All three of these involve repeatable scientific experiments, because they all follow certain universal laws. I believe one of the reasons people put so much faith in the scientific 'theory' of evolution is because these other hard sciences are used to study evolution and the origins of life. But in the end, neither abiogenesis or evolution are subject to the scientific method, since you cannot do experiments on them. They happened in the past.
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneously from inanimate matter.
Spontaneous generation: The theory that the earliest life forms on earth developed from nonliving matter.
Does that sound logical, or magical, to you? All the planets are aligned, got some unknown chemicals-fairy dust no doubt, before fairy dust was outlawed, and poof - life. Sounds magical and very fanciful to me. And yet it must be true because a scientist said so and they've never been wrong before.............oh wait, that's not any where near to the truth. Flat earth, coming Ice Age, no more polar ice caps etc. Those theories where based on what? Logic? And then with abiogenesis, they took their logic and turned it into a fanciful magical fairy tale, but it's OK because it's science.
Abiogenesis: Living organisms can arise spontaneou... (
show quote)
Sounds like a leap of FAITH!
.
Smokie wrote:
Sounds like a leap of FAITH!
.
Exactly! There is not a single scrap of hard scientific evidence that supports a naturalistic origin of life. It, as well as evolution, are nothing but fairy tales for grown-ups. Something they made up, and tried to trick us into thing it's science, just because it was said by a 'scientist'. Mainstream science has become a religion. It's high priests are Richard Dawkins and that idiot in the wheel chair...whatever his name is.
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Exactly! There is not a single scrap of hard scientific evidence that supports a naturalistic origin of life. It, as well as evolution, are nothing but fairy tales for grown-ups. Something they made up, and tried to trick us into thing it's science, just because it was said by a 'scientist'. Mainstream science has become a religion. It's high priests are Richard Dawkins and that idiot in the wheel chair...whatever his name is.
There is a "conspiracy theory" about him being controlled by some nefarious group!
bilordinary wrote:
There is a "conspiracy theory" about him being controlled by some nefarious group!
Naturally. I'll bet you'd have a hard time thinking of something there wasn't a conspiracy theory about.
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Naturally. I'll bet you'd have a hard time thinking of something there wasn't a conspiracy theory about.
Yep, most everything we hear from TV and MSM is bull!
I'll give you weather forecasts as an example.
bilordinary wrote:
Yep, most everything we hear from TV and MSM is bull!
I'll give you weather forecasts as an example.
Well, at least the weatherman makes an honest effort. I think the reason forecasts are so inaccurate is because the climate model is no long valid. They really need to update it.
Little Ball of Hate wrote:
Well, at least the weatherman makes an honest effort. I think the reason forecasts are so inaccurate is because the climate model is no long valid. They really need to update it.
Here ya go, maybe HAARP can help!
bilordinary wrote:
Here ya go, maybe HAARP can help!
IDK. Is that thing for real, or just a conspiracytheory? I mean, controlling the weather? Seriously?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.