One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Hillary and the Supreme Court:
Oct 27, 2016 20:01:47   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
This bozo Hillary doesn't have a clue. She said that the Supreme Court should represent the American people not the wealthy and powerful. Sounds beautiful right? Not if you believe in the United States. The court is to rule on the law. Does being wealthy or powerful disqualify you from a fair hearing? Liberals and many republicans worry about Trumps lack of experience. If you really dig into what Hillary said she is an idiot. After thirty years of political experience she says probably the stupidest thing said this election period, and that's saying something.

Reply
Oct 27, 2016 21:55:00   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
JFlorio wrote:
This bozo Hillary doesn't have a clue. She said that the Supreme Court should represent the American people not the wealthy and powerful. Sounds beautiful right? Not if you believe in the United States. The court is to rule on the law. Does being wealthy or powerful disqualify you from a fair hearing? Liberals and many republicans worry about Trumps lack of experience. If you really dig into what Hillary said she is an idiot. After thirty years of political experience she says probably the stupidest thing said this election period, and that's saying something.
This bozo Hillary doesn't have a clue. She said th... (show quote)


The Supreme court should NOT represent any person or group of people AT ALL. It is only supposed to determine if a law follows the Constitution as it was written by the original authors not by the reinvented interpretations of the false constitutional interpretation of a "living document" reinvented on a daily basis to suit the political left's desires.

Reply
Oct 27, 2016 21:57:59   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Very well said. If she wins I wonder how long it'll take for the RINOs to cave. We don't need nine justices. Nowhere does the Constitution say we have to have nine.
no propaganda please wrote:
The Supreme court should NOT represent any person or group of people AT ALL. It is only supposed to determine if a law follows the Constitution as it was written by the original authors not by the reinvented interpretations of the false constitutional interpretation of a "living document" reinvented on a daily basis to suit the political left's desires.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.